Literature DB >> 24368573

Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Massimiliano Greco1, Giovanni Capretti, Luigi Beretta, Marco Gemma, Nicolò Pecorelli, Marco Braga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses in the literature show that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is associated with lower morbidity rate and shorter hospital stay after elective colorectal surgery. However, a recent Cochrane review did not indicate the ERAS pathway as being the new standard of care due to the limited number of published trials, together with their poor quality. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the impact of the ERAS pathway on overall morbidity, single postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate following colorectal surgery.
METHODS: We searched BioMedCentral, PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for RCTs comparing the ERAS pathway to conventional perioperative care. No language restrictions were considered. A quality score was calculated for each trial included.
RESULTS: A total of 2,376 patients in 16 RCTs were included in the analysis. The ERAS pathway was associated with a reduction of overall morbidity [relative ratio (RR) = 0.60, (95 % CI 0.46-0.76)], particularly with respect to nonsurgical complications [RR = 0.40, (95 % CI 0.27-0.61)]. The reduction of surgical complications was not significant [RR = 0.76, (95 % CI 0.54-1.08)]. The ERAS pathway shortened hospital stay (WMD = -2.28 days [95 % CI -3.09 to -1.47]), without increasing readmission rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The ERAS pathway reduced overall morbidity rates and shortened the length of hospital stay, without increasing readmission rates. A significant reduction in nonsurgical complications was evident, while no significant reduction was found for surgical complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24368573     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  51 in total

1.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Fast track rehabilitation programme enhances functional recovery after laparoscopic colonic resection.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Kun Zhao; Yong Gao; Feng-Tao Liu; Hua-Feng Pan; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012-10

3.  Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Taek-Gu Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Duck-Woo Kim; Samin Hong; Seung Chul Heo; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Intravenous fluid therapy.

Authors:  K Lassen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Jing Xu; Jian-Feng Gong; Yang Bao; Li-Fei Xie; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; M K Y Chan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Implementing fast-track protocol for colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniela Ionescu; Cornel Iancu; Daniela Ion; Nadim Al-Hajjar; Simona Margarit; Lucian Mocan; Teodora Mocan; Delia Deac; Raluca Bodea; Horatiu Vasian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  R Nelson; S Edwards; B Tse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

10.  Fast-track surgery improves postoperative clinical recovery and immunity after elective surgery for colorectal carcinoma: randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Dongjie Yang; Weiling He; Sheng Zhang; Huayun Chen; Changhua Zhang; Yulong He
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  212 in total

1.  A baseline assessment of enhanced recovery protocol implementation at pediatric surgery practices performing inflammatory bowel disease operations.

Authors:  Jonathan Vacek; Teaniese Davis; Benjamin T Many; Sharron Close; Sarah Blake; Yue-Yung Hu; Jane L Holl; Julie Johnson; Jennifer Strople; Mehul V Raval
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Readmission Following Gastric Cancer Resection: Risk Factors and Survival.

Authors:  Alexandra W Acher; Malcolm H Squires; Ryan C Fields; George A Poultsides; Carl Schmidt; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Timothy M Pawlik; Linda X Jin; Aslam Ejaz; David A Kooby; Mark Bloomston; David Worhunsky; Edward A Levine; Neil Saunders; Emily Winslow; Clifford S Cho; Glen Leverson; Shishir K Maithel; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The use of artificial neural networks to predict delayed discharge and readmission in enhanced recovery following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  N K Francis; A Luther; E Salib; L Allanby; D Messenger; A S Allison; N J Smart; J B Ockrim
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  ERAS protocol validation in a propensity-matched cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Aaron C Spaulding; James M Naessens; Zhuo Li; Amit Merchea; Julia E Crook; David W Larson; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Limited preoperative physical capacity continues to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes within a colorectal ERAS programme.

Authors:  E McLennan; R Oliphant; S J Moug
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Preparing enhanced recovery after surgery for implementation in pediatric populations.

Authors:  Ira L Leeds; Emily F Boss; Jessica A George; Valerie Strockbine; Elizabeth C Wick; Eric B Jelin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Short-term outcomes and benefits of ERAS program in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a case-matched study compared to conventional care.

Authors:  Patricia Tejedor; Carlos Pastor; Santiago Gonzalez-Ayora; Mario Ortega-Lopez; Hector Guadalajara; Damian Garcia-Olmo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  The Impact of Total Body Prehabilitation on Post-Operative Outcomes After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison Luther; Joseph Gabriel; Richard P Watson; Nader K Francis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Compliance with enhanced recovery protocols in elderly patients undergoing colorectal resection.

Authors:  S Hallam; F Rickard; N Reeves; D Messenger; J Shabbir
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Does adherence to perioperative enhanced recovery pathway elements influence patient-reported recovery following colorectal resection?

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Saba Balvardi; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.