Literature DB >> 27536616

Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems.

Hyung-Gyu Jang1, Kyung-Jae Lee1, Byung-Woo Min1, Hee-Uk Ye1, Kyung-Hwan Lim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasty using modular distal fixation stems for proximal femoral deficiency.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients (47 hips) were analyzed more than 24 months after revision total hip arthroplasty that used modular distal fixation stems and was performed between 2006 and 2012. There were proximal femoral defects in all cases. Preoperative femoral defect classification revealed Paprosky type II in 31 cases, type IIIA in 7, and type IIIB in 9. The mean duration of follow-up was 53.4 (25-100) months. We evaluated the Harris hip score (HHS), walking ability according to Koval as clinical parameters, stem stability, and stem position change as radiographic parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The average HHS improved form 39.5 points to 91.3 points and walking ability also improved in most cases; all patients had stable fixation of the femoral stem. Postoperative complications included 5 cases of infection and 2 cases of dislocation. The survival rate with the end point of re-revision surgery due to infection or dislocation was 86% after 8-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty using modular femoral stems is useful because the stems can be stably fixed on the diaphyseal portion of the femur, which has relatively good bone quality at mid-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone defect; Hip; Modular femoral stem; Revision arthroplasty

Year:  2015        PMID: 27536616      PMCID: PMC4972717          DOI: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Pelvis        ISSN: 2287-3260


  33 in total

Review 1.  A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR.

Authors:  D C Wirtz; K D Heller; U Holzwarth; C Siebert; R P Pitto; G Zeiler; B A Blencke; R Forst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard E Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The S-ROM cementless femoral stem: history and literature review.

Authors:  Andrew I Spitzer
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G A Hunter; R P Welsh; H U Cameron; W H Bailey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1979-11

7.  A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Louis M Kwong; A John Miller; Phillipp Lubinus
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander Schuh; Stefanie Werber; Ulrich Holzwarth; Günther Zeiler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.

Authors:  Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius; Rudolf Ascherl; Miguel Thorweihe; Raimund Forst; Ulrich Noeth; Uwe M Maus; Matthias D Wimmer; Günther Zeiler; Moritz C Deml
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the causes of failure of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Connor Kenney; Steven Dick; Justin Lea; Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-02

2.  Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hervé Ouanezar; Thomas Jalaguier; Florent Franck; Vincent Pibarot; Hugo Bothorel; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Pierre Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-03

3.  Distal fixation stems for revision of total hip replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Lopreite; Leonel Perez Alamino; Harold Simesen de Bielke; German Garabano; Hernán Del Sel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-21

4.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip replacement with a 3-part metaphyseal osseointegrated titanium alloy stem enhanced with low plasticity burnishing: a mean 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Spencer Summers; Evan Nigh; Karim Sabeh; Raymond Robinson
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-08-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.