Literature DB >> 33716420

Distal fixation stems for revision of total hip replacement.

Fernando Lopreite1, Leonel Perez Alamino1, Harold Simesen de Bielke1,2, German Garabano1, Hernán Del Sel1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess patients treated with modular, non-cemented, tapered, fluted, distal fixation stems. We included patients with 24 months mínimum follow-up. Diagnosis that led to revisions were described. The radiographic analysis was made with preoperative, immediate postoperative and last control postoperative X-rays. Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. We observed 59,7% (n=40) Osteointegration, 34,3% of Stable Fibrosis and 5,97% Unstable fibrosis. Stress Shielding was registered with 10,44% and Subsidence was observed in 34,3% of the patients. Modular, fluted, tapered, distal fixation stems have an excellent survival rates.
© 2021 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Distal Fixation Stems; Joint replacement; Revision of total hip replacement

Year:  2021        PMID: 33716420      PMCID: PMC7932857          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  22 in total

1.  The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register.

Authors:  Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Thomas Eisler; Göran Garellick; Peter Söderman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects.

Authors:  Matthew C Nadaud; William L Griffin; Thomas K Fehring; J Bohannon Mason; Owen B Tabor; Susan Odum; Donna S Nussman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Early outcome of a modular femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael N Kang; James I Huddleston; Kathy Hwang; Susana Imrie; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Second-generation extensively porous-coated THA stems at minimum 10-year followup.

Authors:  David W Hennessy; John J Callaghan; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A comparison of modular tapered versus modular cylindrical stems for complex femoral revisions.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Femoral Revision Using the Wagner SL Revision Stem: A Single-Surgeon Experience Featuring 11-19 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ali Baktır; Fatih Karaaslan; Kürşat Gencer; Sinan Karaoğlu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting.

Authors:  Daniel Neumann; Christoph Thaler; Ulrich Dorn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Matthew Tetreault; Cara A Cipriano; Craig J Della Valle; Wayne Paprosky; Scott Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years followup.

Authors:  Andrew P Van Houwelingen; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Nelson V Greidanus; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.