Literature DB >> 31110401

A systematic review of the causes of failure of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Connor Kenney1, Steven Dick1, Justin Lea2, Jiayong Liu2, Nabil A Ebraheim2.   

Abstract

This study reviewed literature published in the last 10 years to investigate the reasons for revision failure. A total of 9952 revisions were identified and it was determined that the number one cause of failure was aseptic loosening (23.19%), followed by instability (22.43%) and infection (22.13%). Further analysis of applicable revisions investigated BMI and age at the failure rates. The rate of rerevision in obese patients was markedly higher (p < 0.01) compared to non-obese patients and individuals receiving a revision THA under the age of 55 are at a higher risk of rerevision (p < 0.01).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rerevision; Revision failure; Total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Year:  2019        PMID： 31110401      PMCID： PMC6512562          DOI： 10.1016/j.jor.2019.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN： 0972-978X


  26 in total

1.  Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; George Calvert; Frank Tull; Douglas McDonald; William J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Efficacy of revision surgery for the dislocating total hip arthroplasty: report from a large community registry.

Authors:  Tiare Salassa; Daniel Hoeffel; Susan Mehle; Penny Tatman; Terence J Gioe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless femoral stem.

Authors:  Christoper E Pelt; Wes Madsen; Jill A Erickson; Jeremy M Gililland; Mike B Anderson; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Guy Cafri; Maria C S Inacio; Alan L Schepps; Elizabeth W Paxton; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for infection.

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Eric R Wagner; Chad D Watts; Douglas R Osmon; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Jeremy Suggs; Steven M Kurtz; Michael T Manley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Johan Kärrholm; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Medium-term outcomes of cemented prostheses and cementless modular prostheses in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Long Wang; Pengfei Lei; Jie Xie; Kanghua Li; Zixun Dai; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Eradication of infection, survival, and radiological results of uncemented revision stems in infected total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Philipp Born; Thomas Ilchmann; Werner Zimmerli; Lukas Zwicky; Peter Graber; Peter E Ochsner; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.717
View more
  14 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty with a rectangular tapered cementless stem: a retrospective study of the SLR-Plus stem at a mean follow-up of 4.1 years.

Authors:  Iker Uriarte; Jesús Moreta; Laura Cortés; Lucía Bernuy; Urko Aguirre; José Luis Martínez de Los Mozos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 2.  [Postoperative outcomes and survival rates after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty : What can patients expect from revision surgery?]

Authors:  Manuela Hoffmann; Johannes C Reichert; Anastasia Rakow; Janosch Schoon; Georgi I Wassilew
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with poorer clinically meaningful improvements and patient satisfaction compared to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Siyuan Zhang; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Hee Nee Pang; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo; Ming Han Lincoln Liow
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 4.  [Partial or full component exchange in hip revision? : The relevance of off-label use and mix & match].

Authors:  K P Günther; K Tucker; P Kjaersgaard-Andersen; J Lützner; J P Kretzer; R Nelissen; T Lange; L Zagra
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Sophia Rainbird; Chelsea Dyer; Stephen E Graves; Roger Bingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Outcome and risk factors of failures associated with revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Christian Klemt; Wenhao Chen; Georges Bounajem; Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala; Liang Xiong; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Antibiotic-Loaded Hydrogel Coating to Reduce Early Postsurgical Infections in Aseptic Hip Revision Surgery: A Retrospective, Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Daniele De Meo; Valeria Calogero; Lorenzo Are; Armando U Cavallo; Pietro Persiani; Ciro Villani
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-15

8.  Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Nano-Structured and Nano-Coated Ortho-Prosthetic Materials by a Dynamic Model.

Authors:  Simone Leonetti; Benedetta Tuvo; Beatrice Campanella; Stefano Legnaioli; Massimo Onor; Emilia Bramanti; Michele Totaro; Angelo Baggiani; Serena Giorgi; Gaetano Pierpaolo Privitera; Nicola Piolanti; Paolo Domenico Parchi; Beatrice Casini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Enhanced osteogenesis of titanium with nano-Mg(OH)2 film and a mechanism study via whole genome expression analysis.

Authors:  Mengyu Yao; Shi Cheng; Guoqing Zhong; Jielong Zhou; Hongwei Shao; Limin Ma; Chang Du; Feng Peng; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-02-13

Review 10.  EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith Tucker; Klaus-Peter Günther; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Jörg Lützner; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Toni Lange; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.