Literature DB >> 15057090

Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty.

Richard E Jones1.   

Abstract

Many different clinical circumstances are seen in revision total hip arthroplasty. Modular stems provide significant flexibility in choices to ensure distal and/or proximal unitary construct of implant and host bone. There are two basic types of modular stems. Designs that incorporate a metaphyseal sleeve taper fit with a splined, slotted distal body of varying lengths and neck offsets and also provide infinite choices for version of the components. Designs incorporate a distal stem with various proximal stems and Morse tapers. These designs also may vary the distal stem configuration from extensively porous-coated, to tapered and with corundum, to splined and slotted. Although there have been no clinical studies that document improved outcomes with modular stems over one-piece stems, the intraoperative flexibility provided by choices of diameter, stem length, fixation type, and proximal stem size and orientation enable establishment of a stable hip center. I will review the clinical indications for modular stems, outline their advantages, discuss the applicable operative techniques, the reported results, and the limitations of the current literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15057090     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  [Replacement of femoral hip prostheses].

Authors:  M Rudert; M Hoberg; P M Prodinger; R Gradinger; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Component version in modular total hip revision.

Authors:  Michael A Kopec; Aaron Pemberton; Joseph C Milbrandt; Gordon Allan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

3.  Double metal tibial blocks augmentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyu Sung Chung; Jin Kyu Lee; Hee Jae Lee; Choong Hyeok Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Stem-Sleeve Junction Failure of a Modular Femoral Hip System: a Retrieval Analysis.

Authors:  Feras Waly; Fahad H Abduljabbar; Trevor Gascoyne; Thomas R Turgeon; Olga Huk
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-07-09

5.  Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems.

Authors:  Hyung-Gyu Jang; Kyung-Jae Lee; Byung-Woo Min; Hee-Uk Ye; Kyung-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 6.  [Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty : classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; P M Prodinger; M Hoberg; R Meffert; M Rudert; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

8.  Distal femoral stem-bone anchorage of a cementless revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of 14 patients by CT.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Fredrik Strömwall; Mats O Beckman; Karl A Hansson; André Stark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18

10.  Extensively coated revision stems in proximally deficient femur: early results in 15 patients.

Authors:  S K S Marya; R Thukral
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.