| Literature DB >> 27524983 |
Congcong Shen1, Yu Shi2, Yingying Ni2, Ye Deng3, Joy D Van Nostrand4, Zhili He4, Jizhong Zhou5, Haiyan Chu2.
Abstract
The elevational and latitudinal diversity patterns of microbial taxa have attracted great attention in the past decade. Recently, the distribution of functional attributes has been in the spotlight. Here, we report a study profiling soil microbial communities along an elevation gradient (500-2200 m) on Changbai Mountain. Using a comprehensive functional gene microarray (GeoChip 5.0), we found that microbial functional gene richness exhibited a dramatic increase at the treeline ecotone, but the bacterial taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing did not exhibit such a similar trend. However, the β-diversity (compn>ositional dissimilarity among sites) pattern for both bacterial taxa and functional genes was similar, showing significant elevational distance-decay patterns which presented increased dissimilarity with elevation. The bacterial taxonomic diversity/structure was strongly influenced by soil pH, while the functional gene diversity/structure was significantly correlated with soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC). This finding highlights that soil DOC may be a good predictor in determining the elevational distribution of microbial functional genes. The finding of significant shifts in functional gene diversity at the treeline ecotone could also provide valuable information for predicting the responses of microbial functions to climate change.Entities:
Keywords: GeoChip; alpha and beta diversity patterns; bacterial taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity; elevation gradient; metagenomics; microbial functional genes; soil dissolved organic carbon; treeline ecotone
Year: 2016 PMID: 27524983 PMCID: PMC4965465 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Results from analysis of microbial functional gene composition dissimilarities (MRPP, ADONIS, and ANOSIM) among different elevations.
| MRPP | ADONIS | ANOSIM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ | ||||||
| 500 vs. 700 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 4.56 | 0.001 | 0.828 | 0.007 |
| 500 vs. 1000 | 0.052 | 0.01 | 4.338 | 0.001 | 0.752 | 0.006 |
| 500 vs. 1300 | 0.052 | 0.008 | 7.462 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.004 |
| 500 vs. 1600 | 0.063 | 0.01 | 5.654 | 0.001 | 0.732 | 0.007 |
| 500 vs. 1900 | 0.05 | 0.013 | 83.661 | 0.005 | 1 | 0.007 |
| 500 vs. 2200 | 0.048 | 0.008 | 108.418 | 0.005 | 1 | 0.007 |
| 700 vs. 1000 | 0.051 | 0.012 | 4.758 | 0.001 | 0.928 | 0.011 |
| 700 vs. 1300 | 0.051 | 0.007 | 6.887 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.01 |
| 700 vs. 1600 | 0.062 | 0.008 | 4.288 | 0.001 | 0.648 | 0.007 |
| 700 vs. 1900 | 0.049 | 0.005 | 107.31 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.006 |
| 700 vs. 2200 | 0.048 | 0.005 | 137.503 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.01 |
| 1000 vs. 1300 | 0.053 | 0.006 | 4.485 | 0.001 | 0.892 | 0.009 |
| 1000 vs. 1600 | 0.065 | 0.01 | 3.445 | 0.001 | 0.608 | 0.004 |
| 1000 vs. 1900 | 0.051 | 0.01 | 89.406 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.007 |
| 1000 vs. 2200 | 0.05 | 0.009 | 114.763 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.007 |
| 1300 vs. 1600 | 0.065 | 0.006 | 3.261 | 0.001 | 0.572 | 0.005 |
| 1300 vs. 1900 | 0.051 | 0.013 | 94.395 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.012 |
| 1300 vs. 2200 | 0.05 | 0.009 | 121.4 | 0.005 | 1 | 0.011 |
| 1600 vs. 1900 | 0.062 | 0.014 | 61.476 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.011 |
| 1600 vs. 2200 | 0.061 | 0.011 | 77.658 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.008 |
| 1900 vs. 2200 | 0.048 | 0.009 | 5.843 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.011 |
Mantel test results for the correlation between bacterial community composition and microbial functional gene composition and environmental variables along the elevational gradient.
| Bacteria | Functional genes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ||||
| pH | -0.02 | 0.58 | ||
| AP | 0.11 | 0.08 | ||
| %TN | -0.05 | 0.80 | ||
| DOC | ||||
| DON | ||||
| -0.02 | 0.55 | |||
| 0.11 | 0.11 | |||
| AK | -0.03 | 0.67 | ||
| Moisture | 0.03 | 0.28 | ||
| %TC | 0.12 | 0.07 | ||
Results of distance-based multivariate linear model (DistLM) for microbial functional gene composition showing the % variation explained by environmental variables.
| Variable | %Var | pseudo-F | Cum.(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOC | 43.52 | 25.43 | 0.001 | |
| DON | 28.07 | 12.88 | 0.002 | |
| AP | 21.75 | 9.17 | 0.005 | |
| 15.34 | 5.98 | 0.008 | ||
| %TC | 17.84 | 7.16 | 0.01 | |
| Moisture | 11.82 | 4.42 | 0.027 | |
| AK | 7.89 | 9.17 | 0.088 | |
| pH | 6.34 | 2.23 | 0.14 | |
| %TN | 3.51 | 1.19 | 0.267 | |
| 0.77 | 0.25 | 0.747 | ||
| DOC | 43.52 | 25.43 | 0.001 | 43.52 |
| AP | 7.98 | 5.26 | 0.023 | 51.5 |
| AK | 6.63 | 4.91 | 0.013 | 58.13 |
| 4.14 | 3.28 | 0.036 | 62.27 | |
| 3.14 | 2.64 | 0.074 | 65.41 | |
| Moisture | 3.11 | 2.75 | 0.065 | 68.52 |
| pH | 2.07 | 1.91 | 0.124 | 70.59 |
| %TN | 1.82 | 1.71 | 0.168 | 72.41 |
| %TC | 3.09 | 3.15 | 0.058 | 75.5 |
| DON | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.582 | 76.06 |