| Literature DB >> 25613225 |
Junjun Ding1, Yuguang Zhang2, Ye Deng3, Jing Cong4, Hui Lu2, Xin Sun5, Caiyun Yang6, Tong Yuan6, Joy D Van Nostrand6, Diqiang Li2, Jizhong Zhou7, Yunfeng Yang5.
Abstract
The forest timberline responds quickly and markedly to climate changes, rendering it a ready indicator. Climate warming has caused an upshift of the timberline worldwide. However, the impact on belowground ecosystem and biogeochemical cycles remain elusive. To understand soil microbial ecology of the timberline, we analyzed microbial communities via 16s rRNA Illumina sequencing, a microarray-based tool named GeoChip 4.0 and a random matrix theory-based association network approach. We selected 24 sampling sites at two vegetation belts forming the timberline of Shennongjia Mountain in Hubei Province of China, a region with extraordinarily rich biodiversity. We found that temperature, among all of measured environmental parameters, showed the most significant and extensive linkages with microbial biomass, microbial diversity and composition at both taxonomic and functional gene levels, and microbial association network. Therefore, temperature was the best predictor for microbial community variations in the timberline. Furthermore, abundances of nitrogen cycle and phosphorus cycle genes were concomitant with NH4(+)-N, NO3(-)-N and total phosphorus, offering tangible clues to the underlying mechanisms of soil biogeochemical cycles. As the first glimpse at both taxonomic and functional compositions of soil microbial community of the timberline, our findings have major implications for predicting consequences of future timberline upshift.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25613225 PMCID: PMC4303876 DOI: 10.1038/srep07994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary of environmental parameters analyzed by two-tailed t-test
| Shrubland | Coniferous forest | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant species | 12 (5) | 47 (17) | |
| Plant diversity | 1.64 (0.01) | 2.64 (0.33) | |
| Taxonomic diversity | 248.49 (146.37) | 121.58 (130.59) | |
| Functional diversity | 126.19 (0.61) | 124.18 (0.96) | |
| Soil microbial biomass carbon (mg/kg) | 1457.39 (315.10) | 1081.40 (247.75) | |
| Soil microbial biomass nitrogen (mg/kg) | 169.20 (34.69) | 120.34 (23.52) | |
| Moisture (%) | 29.73 (2.73) | 45.14 (4.23) | |
| Soil temperature (°C) | 12.14 (0.35) | 10.90 (0.50) | |
| Air annual average temperature (°C) | 4.62 | 4.00 | |
| Soil organic carbon (mg/kg) | 59981.92 (12469.14) | 63634.61 (16736.75) | 0.793 |
| Labile organic carbon (mg/kg) | 6093.65 (2622.35) | 6441.53 (3422.21) | 0.782 |
| Dissolved organic carbon (mg/kg) | 283.27 (223.28) | 206.90 (93.19) | 0.282 |
| Total nitrogen (mg/kg) | 4447.50 (1059.86) | 4311.82 (852.72) | 0.564 |
| Alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen (mg/kg) | 404.51 (96.69) | 350.57 (79.80) | 0.092 |
| NH4+-N (mg/kg) | 19.29 (3.43) | 15.26 (3.32) | |
| NO3−-N (mg/kg) | 11.02 (5.28) | 18.42 (14.44) | 0.147 |
| δ13C (‰) | −25.98 (0.41) | −25.44 (0.26) | |
| δ15N (‰) | 4.61 (0.82) | 3.00 (0.76) | |
| pH | 4.43 (0.15) | 5.07 (0.48) | |
| Rapidly available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 8.39 (0.58) | 11.41 (2.58) | 0.580 |
| Total phosphorus (mg/kg) | 1971.66 (1052.02) | 604.50 (109.59) | |
| Total sulfur (mg/kg) | 656.67 (259.32) | 337.57 (72.84) | |
| Total potassium (mg/kg) | 4281.21 (777.54) | 4230.07 (1389.61) | 0.739 |
| Al (mg/kg) | 22572.10 (3378.57) | 32555.23 (3378.57) | |
| Fe (mg/kg) | 20766.62 (4067.16) | 35420.78 (6583.12) | |
| Altitude (m) | 2748.50 (15.89) | 2541.36 (55.38) |
P<0.050 is shown in bold. n/a: not applicable. Values in parenthesis represent standard deviation.
Figure 1Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of microbial community based on (A) high-throughput sequencing data and (B) GeoChip data.
The values for Axes 1, 2 and 3 are percentages of variation attributed to the corresponding axis.
Figure 2Correlations between (A) microbial biomass (indicated by soil microbial biomass carbon and soil microbial biomass nitrogen) and soil temperature, and (B) microbial α-diversity (taxonomic and functional diversity) and soil temperature.
White and black dots represent samples from the shrubland and the coniferous forest, respectively.
Figure 3Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of (A) high-throughput sequencing data and (B) GeoChip data with environmental parameters.
TS, total sulfur; TP, total phosphorus.
The relationships of microbial community structure to environmental parameters revealed by partial Mantel tests
| Temperature | Soil | Plant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil | Plant | Temperature | Plant | Temperature | Soil | |
| In association with: controlling for: microbial communities | rM( | rM( | rM( | rM( | rM( | rM( |
| OTUs | 0.54 ( | 0.60 ( | 0.41 ( | 0.46 ( | 0.22 (0.056) | 0.14 (0.094) |
| Functional genes | 0.13 ( | 0.16 ( | 0.11 (0.215) | 0.14 (0.160) | 0.05 (0.375) | 0.03 (0.417) |
aTemperature included soil temperature and air annual temperature.
bSoil parameters included soil organic carbon, labile organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, total nitrogen, alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen, NH4+-N, NO3−-N, δ13C, δ15N, soil pH, Rapidly available phosphorus, total phosphorus, total sulfur, total potassium, Al, Fe.
cPlant parameters was the plant community structure, composed of the significant value of each specie in every sampling site.
Figure 4The fold change of N cycle genes between the shrubland and the coniferous forest.
The percentage of each gene indicated the relative fold changes, with red and green colors indicating the higher and lower signal intensity of each detected gene in the coniferous forest, respectively. This percentage was calculated by the sum of the signal intensity of each detected gene divided by the total sum of signal intensity of all detected N cycle genes, and weighted by the fold change of each gene for the coniferous forest over the shrubland. ***P < 0.010; **P < 0.050.
Figure 5Correlations between (A) NH4+-N, NO3−-N and total abundance of ammonium oxidizer, (B) NH4+-N, NO3−-N and total abundance of bacterial amoA gene, and (C) abundance of ammonium oxidizer and bacterial amoA gene.
White and black dots represent samples from the shrubland and the coniferous forest, respectively.
Figure 6Network interactions between environmental parameters and microbial taxonomic community.
The red node represents temperature. The green ones represent the nodes directly connected to temperature, bigger diameter of which indicates higher connectivity. The purple ones were indirectly connected OTUs.