Literature DB >> 31630082

Changes over time in the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap (IPG) effect following cochlear implantation in Guinea pigs.

Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac1, Deborah J Colesa2, Christopher J Buswinka2, Donald L Swiderski2, Yehoash Raphael2, Bryan E Pfingst2.   

Abstract

The electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) is correlated with spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) density in cochlear implanted animals. In a previous study, we showed that ECAP amplitude growth function (AGF) linear slopes for stimuli with a constant interphase gap (IPG) changed significantly over time following implantation. Related studies have also shown that 1) IPG sensitivity for ECAP measures ("IPG Effect") is related to SGN density in animals and 2) the ECAP IPG Effect is related to speech recognition performance in humans with cochlear implants. The current study examined how the ECAP IPG Effect changed following cochlear implantation in four non-deafened guinea pigs with residual inner hair cells (IHCs) and 5 deafened, neurotrophin-treated guinea pigs. Simple impedances were measured on the same days as the ECAP measures. Generally, non-deafened implanted animals with higher SGN survival demonstrated higher ECAP AGF linear slope and peak amplitude values than the deafened, implanted guinea pigs. The ECAP IPG Effect for the AGF slopes and peak amplitudes was also larger in the hearing animals. The N1 latencies for a constant IPG were not different between groups, but the N1 latency IPG Effect was smaller in the non-deafened, implanted animals. Similar to previously reported results, ECAP measures using a fixed or changing IPG required as many as three months after implantation before a stable point could be calculated, but this was dependent on the animal and condition. For all ECAP measures most animals showed greater variance in the first 30 days post-implantation. Post-implantation changes in ECAPs and impedances were not correlated with one another. Results from this study are helpful for estimating the mechanisms underlying ECAP characteristics and have implications for clinical application of the ECAP measures in long-term human cochlear implant recipients. Specifically, these measures could help to monitor neural health over a period of time, or during a time of stability these measures could be used to help select electrode sites for activation in clinical programming.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory prosthesis; Cochlear implant; ECAP; Guinea pig; Neural health

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31630082      PMCID: PMC7093157          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  41 in total

1.  The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds.

Authors:  Gina L Su; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

4.  An asymptotic test for the equality of coefficients of variation from k populations.

Authors:  C J Feltz; G E Miller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Takefumi Kamakura; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Smith; F B Simmons
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  R D Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joshua Kuang-Chao Chen; Ann Yi-Chiun Chuang; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Tao-Hsin Tung; Lieber Po-Hung Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Timothy A Holden; Teresa A Zwolan; H Alexander Arts; Jill B Firszt; Christopher J Buswinka; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-27

3.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Heval Benav; Sjaak F L Klis; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

5.  Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.672

6.  Interpreting the interphase gap effect on the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Yi Yuan; Jeffrey Skidmore; Shuman He
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Combined brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 treatment is preferred over either one separately in the preservation of the auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs.

Authors:  Henk A Vink; Dyan Ramekers; Hans G X M Thomeer; Huib Versnel
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  Development of a chronically-implanted mouse model for studies of cochlear health and implant function.

Authors:  Deborah J Colesa; Jenna Devare; Donald L Swiderski; Lisa A Beyer; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A Broadly Applicable Method for Characterizing the Slope of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Dyan Ramekers; Deborah J Colesa; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.