Literature DB >> 27515706

Multicenter surgical experience evaluation on the Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools.

Dzemal Gazibegovic1, Eva M Bero2.   

Abstract

The HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode is intended to improve hearing for individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss by providing extended electrical coverage of the cochlea while minimizing trauma related to insertion. The electrode is appropriate for use with a wide range of surgical techniques, including either a cochleostomy or round window insertion, and the use of either a free-hand or tool-assisted approach. The objective of this survey was to evaluate how the HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools was used across a population of cochlear implant recipients of differing ages, audiologic profiles, and anatomical characteristics. The intent was to understand the type and frequency of surgical techniques applicable with the electrode, and to provide guidelines for clinical practice. Two questionnaires were completed by surgeons at implant centres located in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Before any surgeries were conducted, surgeons completed a questionnaire that assessed their overall cochlear implant surgical practice and preferences. Following each HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode insertion, surgeons completed a questionnaire that summarized their experience during that surgical procedure. Questionnaires were completed by 32 surgeons from 16 centres for a total of 143 surgeries (112 adults, 31 children). Most surgeons (62 %) preferred to insert the electrode via the round window or an extended round window compared with a cochleostomy (16 %), whereas the remaining 22 % indicated that they made an insertion choice based on presenting anatomy. Sixty-nine percent preferred a free-hand approach over using insertion tools. In 32 procedures, surgeons elected to deviate from an intended round window insertion to either an extended round window or cochleostomy approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Insertion tool; Mid-Scala; Pre-curved electrode; Round window; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27515706     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4255-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani.

Authors:  Stephen E J Connor; N Julian Holland; Andreas Agger; Annabelle C Leong; Re Ajay Varghese; Dan Jiang; Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Scala tympani cochleostomy I: results of a survey.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  The new mid-scala electrode array: a radiologic and histologic study in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Stefan Bulla; Wolfgang Maier; Roland Laszig; Susan Arndt; Rainer Beck; Lousia Traser; Antje Aschendorff
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Insertion characteristics and placement of the Mid-Scala electrode array in human temporal bones using detailed cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Dzemal Gazibegovic; Jyrki Tervaniemi; Veli-Matti Vartiainen; Heikki Löppönen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings.

Authors:  Céline Richard; Jose N Fayad; Joni Doherty; Fred H Linthicum
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Noise exposure of the inner ear during drilling a cochleostomy for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Hans Wilhelm Pau; Tino Just; Matthias Bornitz; Nikoloz Lasurashvilli; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy.

Authors:  Bryan J Kang; Ana H Kim
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Round window insertion of precurved electrodes is traumatic.

Authors:  Anita Jeyakumar; Sarah F Peña; Todd M Brickman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Arne H Voie; Barry Brunsden; J Gail Neely; Eugene A Saxon; Timothy E Hullar; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2007-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.

Authors:  David Po-Yi Lin; Joshua Kuang-Chao Chen; Tao-Hsin Tung; Lieber Po-Hung Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evolution of impedance values in cochlear implant patients after early switch-on.

Authors:  Jeff Jia-Fu Wei; Tao-Hsin Tung; Lieber Po-Hung Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Complications of Cochleostomy Versus Round Window Surgical Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Vardhan S Avasarala; Sanjay K Jinka; Anita Jeyakumar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-29

4.  Radiological and surgical aspects of round window visibility during cochlear implantation: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Saad Jwair; Job J M van Eijden; Esther E Blijleven; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Hans G X M Thomeer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.