OBJECTIVE: To compare speech perception after undergoing round window (RW) electrode insertion with those who underwent traditional cochleostomy (C) cochlear implant (CI) surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Academic cochlear implant center. SUBJECTS: Patients who met CI criteria with favorable intraoperative RW anatomy who underwent RW CI electrode insertion. Patients who underwent traditional C surgery were matched for age, duration of deafness, and preoperative hearing. METHODS: Postoperative speech performance using the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) test, Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NUCHIPS), and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) between 3 and 48 months after CI. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients underwent RW insertion between 2004 and 2011. Of these, 55 had pre- and postoperative speech perception data for analysis. Average age of implantation ranged from 2.4 to 87.3 years (mean ± SD, 42.1 ± 24.2 years) for RW patients. Average age of implantation for matched traditional C patients ranged from 2.3 to 85.6 years (mean ± SD, 43.3 ± 25.0 years). No significant differences in postoperative CI speech perception scores were noted between the RW and C groups at 12 months post-CI (RW group, 55.28% ± 23.26% vs C group, 53.19% ± 24.14%; P = .70). CONCLUSION: Our study found that patients with favorable RW anatomy who underwent RW CI electrode insertion demonstrated comparable speech perception compared with the traditional cochleostomy insertion group.
OBJECTIVE: To compare speech perception after undergoing round window (RW) electrode insertion with those who underwent traditional cochleostomy (C) cochlear implant (CI) surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Academic cochlear implant center. SUBJECTS:Patients who met CI criteria with favorable intraoperative RW anatomy who underwent RW CI electrode insertion. Patients who underwent traditional C surgery were matched for age, duration of deafness, and preoperative hearing. METHODS: Postoperative speech performance using the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) test, Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NUCHIPS), and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) between 3 and 48 months after CI. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients underwent RW insertion between 2004 and 2011. Of these, 55 had pre- and postoperative speech perception data for analysis. Average age of implantation ranged from 2.4 to 87.3 years (mean ± SD, 42.1 ± 24.2 years) for RW patients. Average age of implantation for matched traditional C patients ranged from 2.3 to 85.6 years (mean ± SD, 43.3 ± 25.0 years). No significant differences in postoperative CI speech perception scores were noted between the RW and C groups at 12 months post-CI (RW group, 55.28% ± 23.26% vs C group, 53.19% ± 24.14%; P = .70). CONCLUSION: Our study found that patients with favorable RW anatomy who underwent RW CI electrode insertion demonstrated comparable speech perception compared with the traditional cochleostomy insertion group.
Authors: Alexandre Caixeta Guimarães; Guilherme Machado de Carvalho; Alexandre S M Duarte; Walter A Bianchini; Andrea Bravo Sarasty; Maria Fernanda di Gregorio; Mario Emilio Zernotti; Edi Lúcia Sartorato; Arthur Menino Castilho Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-12-27