Literature DB >> 27493618

Implementation of the German Mammography Screening Program (German MSP) and First Results for Initial Examinations, 2005-2009.

Daniela Malek1, Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The German Mammography Screening Program (German MSP) is population-based and intended for women aged 50-69 years (approximately 10.5 million). The program started in 2005 and was implemented within 5 years. This article describes the implementation, structure, and screening process, and presents the results of initial examinations for the prevalence phase.
METHODS: Data were collected annually from invitation centers (invitation, attendance), screening units (performance, outcomes), and cancer registries (incidence).
RESULTS: In 2009, 92% of all annually eligible women were invited; 50% of the annually eligible population participated. The total cancer detection rate in the period of 2005-2009 was 8.1/1,000; the corresponding recall rate was 5.9%. 19.6% of detected cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ; 76.7% of invasive cancers were ≤ 20 mm in size, 30.2% were ≤ 10 mm, and 75.3% were node-negative. During the implementation period, incidence increased by 37 and 56% in the old and new federal states, respectively. Incidence rates decreased following the prevalence phase.
CONCLUSION: The German MSP was successfully implemented. The results of the prevalence phase meet the target values of the European guidelines. Proper functioning of the program is also verified by its effects on breast cancer incidence. To draw reliable conclusions regarding the long-term effects of the program, results from the routine screening rounds have to be awaited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Germany; Implementation; Mammography; Screening

Year:  2016        PMID: 27493618      PMCID: PMC4960364          DOI: 10.1159/000446359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  12 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Diana L Miglioretti; Julietta Patnick; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Sweden.

Authors:  P Autier; A Koechlin; M Smans; L Vatten; M Boniol
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  [Determination of interval cancer rates in the German mammography screening program using population-based cancer registry data].

Authors:  I Urbschat; O Heidinger
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.

Authors:  Donella Puliti; Stephen W Duffy; Guido Miccinesi; Harry de Koning; Elsebeth Lynge; Marco Zappa; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries.

Authors:  Sven Törnberg; Levent Kemetli; Nieves Ascunce; Solveig Hofvind; Ahti Anttila; Brigitte Sèradour; Eugenio Paci; Cathrine Guldenfels; Edward Azavedo; Alfonso Frigerio; Vitor Rodrigues; Antonio Ponti
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Berta Geller; Pamela M Vacek; Steinar Thoresen; Per Skaane
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Bjørn Heine Strand; Jan Maehlen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-10

Review 9.  A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Understanding recent trends in incidence of invasive breast cancer in Norway: age-period-cohort analysis based on registry data on mammography screening and hormone treatment use.

Authors:  Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Kjersti Bakken; Lars J Vatten; Steinar Tretli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-30
View more
  6 in total

1.  Differences in Breast Cancer Characteristics by Mammography Screening Participation or Non-Participation.

Authors:  Bettina Braun; Laura Khil; Joke Tio; Barbara Krause-Bergmann; Andrea Fuhs; Oliver Heidinger; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Organization and Evaluation of Performance Indicators of a Breast Cancer Screening Program in Meknes-Tafilalt Region, Morocco

Authors:  Hafida Charaka; Mohamed Khalis; Samira Elfakir; Youssef Chami Khazraji; Ahmed Zidouh; Loubna Abousselham; Karima El Rhazi; Badiaa Lyoussi; Chakib Nejjari
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Implementation of an algorithm for the identification of breast cancer deaths in German health insurance claims data: a validation study based on a record linkage with administrative mortality data.

Authors:  Ingo Langner; Christoph Ohlmeier; Ulrike Haug; Hans Werner Hense; Jonas Czwikla; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer survival in a metropolitan area: An analysis of cancer registry data from Hamburg, Germany.

Authors:  Lina Jansen; Cynthia Erb; Alice Nennecke; Isabelle Finke; Ron Pritzkuleit; Bernd Holleczek; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-02-26

5.  Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stefanie Weigel; Joachim Gerss; Hans-Werner Hense; Miriam Krischke; Alexander Sommer; Jörg Czwoydzinski; Horst Lenzen; Laura Kerschke; Karin Spieker; Stefanie Dickmaenken; Sonja Baier; Marc Urban; Gerold Hecht; Oliver Heidinger; Joachim Kieschke; Walter Heindel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Assessing and Explaining Geographic Variations in Mammography Screening Participation and Breast Cancer Incidence.

Authors:  Jonas Czwikla; Iris Urbschat; Joachim Kieschke; Frank Schüssler; Ingo Langner; Falk Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.