Literature DB >> 15013948

Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study.

Per-Henrik Zahl1, Bjørn Heine Strand, Jan Maehlen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether any increase in the incidence of breast cancer in women detected by mammography is compensated for by a drop in the incidence after age 69, years when women are no longer invited for screening.
DESIGN: Population based cohort study of incidence of breast cancer during the introduction of nationwide screening programmes.
SETTING: Norway and Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: All women aged above 30 years (1.4 and 2.9 million, respectively, in 2000). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in age specific incidence rates of invasive breast cancer associated with the introduction of the screening programmes.
RESULTS: As a result of screening the recorded incidence of breast cancer in women aged 50-69 years increased by 54% in Norway and 45% in Sweden. There was no corresponding decline in incidence after the age of 69 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Without screening one third of all invasive breast cancers in the age group 50-69 years would not have been detected in the patients' lifetime. This level of overdiagnosis is larger than previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15013948      PMCID: PMC390204          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38044.666157.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Women need better information about routine mammography.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards; Michael Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-12

3.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  O Olsen; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Evaluation of breast cancer incidence: is the increase due entirely to mammographic screening?

Authors:  C Harmer; M Staples; A M Kavanagh
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Extra incidence caused by mammographic screening.

Authors:  R Boer; P Warmerdam; H de Koning; G van Oortmarssen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Breast cancer screening in Navarra: interpretation of a high detection rate at the first screening round and a low rate at the second round.

Authors:  M E van den Akker-van Marle; C M Reep-van den Bergh; R Boer; A Del Moral; N Ascunce; H J de Koning
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1997-11-14       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Implementation of screening as a public health policy: issues in design and evaluation.

Authors:  M Hakama; E Pukkala; B Söderman; N Day
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

  8 in total
  67 in total

1.  An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts.

Authors:  Bernard Junod; Per-Henrik Zahl; Robert M Kaplan; Jørn Olsen; Sander Greenland
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 2.  Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Lyndal Trevena; Heather M Davey; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

3.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer: presentation of benefits and harms needs to be balanced.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Hazel Thornton; Karsten J Jørgensen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-30

4.  Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: definition of overdiagnosis is confusing in follow-up of Malmö trial.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Jan Maehlen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

5.  Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Nehmat Houssami; Bruce Armstrong; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

6.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Ingvar Andersson; Lars Janzon; Jonas Manjer; Jens Peter Garne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-03

7.  Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

8.  Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten Howard; Les Irwig; Glenn Salkeld; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-08

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.