Literature DB >> 17594526

Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Solveig Hofvind1, Berta Geller, Pamela M Vacek, Steinar Thoresen, Per Skaane.   

Abstract

This is an evaluation of selected process indicators achieved during the first 10 years of performance of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP). The indicators are compared with the recommended levels given in the European Guidelines. The program invites all female residents aged 50-69 years old to two-view mammography biennially. The attendance rate was 76.2%. The recall rates due to positive mammography were 4.6% and 2.6%, and the detection rates were 6.4 and 4.9 per 1,000 screens, in prevalent and subsequent screens, respectively. Mean tumor size was 14.7 mm for screening detected and 21.2 mm for interval cancers. Axillary lymph node metastases were present in 25.4% and 43.8%, respectively. Detection mode (screening detected or interval cancer) was shown to be an independent predictor for axillary lymph node metastases and high-grade (Grade 3) tumors. The NBCSP meets the recommendations given in the European Guidelines for most of the process indicators evaluated in this study. Based on the results, we anticipate a future mortality reduction from breast cancer in women invited to the NBCSP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17594526     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-007-9137-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  21 in total

1.  Validity of process indicators of screening for breast cancer to predict mortality reduction.

Authors:  T Sarkeala; A Anttila; I Saarenmaa; M Hakama
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Diana L Miglioretti; Julietta Patnick; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Survival from invasive breast cancer among interval cases in the mammography screening programmes of northern Sweden.

Authors:  P Bordás; H Jonsson; L Nyström; P Lenner
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Mammography screening. One versus two views and independent double reading.

Authors:  E Thurfjell
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane; Bedrich Vitak; Hege Wang; Steinar Thoresen; Liv Eriksen; Hilde Bjørndal; Audun Braaten; Nils Bjurstam
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Completeness and accuracy of registration of ovarian cancer in the cancer registry of Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Tingulstad; Tore Halvorsen; Jarle Norstein; Bjørn Hagen; Finn Egil Skjeldestad
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-04-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done?

Authors:  B C Yankaskas; C N Klabunde; R Ancelle-Park; G Renner; H Wang; J Fracheboud; G Pou; J-L Bulliard
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Bjørn Heine Strand; Jan Maehlen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-10

10.  Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.

Authors:  E Thurfjell
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1995
View more
  36 in total

1.  Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane; Joann G Elmore; Sofie Sebuødegård; Solveig Roth Hoff; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quantifying the value of markers in screening programmes.

Authors:  Søren Dinesen Østergaard; Peter Thisted Dinesen; Leslie Foldager
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Gunvor G Waade; Nataliia Moshina; Sofie Sebuødegård; Peter Hogg; Solveig Hofvind
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.

Authors:  Katja Kemp Jacobsen; Ellen S O'Meara; Dustin Key; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Ilse Vejborg; Brian L Sprague; Elsebeth Lynge; My von Euler-Chelpin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Risk of breast cancer following fertility treatment--a registry based cohort study of parous women in Norway.

Authors:  Marte Myhre Reigstad; Inger Kristin Larsen; Tor Åge Myklebust; Trude Eid Robsahm; Nan Birgitte Oldereid; Anne Katerine Omland; Siri Vangen; Louise Annette Brinton; Ritsa Storeng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway.

Authors:  S Hofvind; B M Geller; J Skelly; P M Vacek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update.

Authors:  Sandra J Lee; Xiaoxue Li; Hui Huang; Marvin Zelen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Pamela M Vacek; Joan Skelly; Donald L Weaver; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers.

Authors:  S Hofvind; B Geller; P Skaane
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Implementation of the German Mammography Screening Program (German MSP) and First Results for Initial Examinations, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Daniela Malek; Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.