Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Literature DB >> 23744281

The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

M G Marmot¹, D G Altman, D A Cameron, J A Dewar, S G Thompson, M Wilcox.

Abstract

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Year: 2013 PMID： 23744281 PMCID： PMC3693450 DOI： 10.1038/bjc.2013.177

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN： 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640

× No keyword cloud information.

250 in total

1. Mammography screening: time to reevaluate its impact?

Authors: Jean-Luc Bulliard; Fabio Levi
Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.497

2. Number needed to screen: appropriate use of this new basis for screening mammography guidelines.

Authors: Stephen A Feig
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.959

3. The incidence of advanced breast cancer in the West Midlands, United Kingdom.

Authors: Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol
Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.497

4. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.

Authors: Mette Kalager; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 25.391

5. Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: time to tackle an underappreciated harm.

Authors: Joann G Elmore; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 25.391

6. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors: A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal: Lancet Date: 1984-06-02 Impact factor: 79.321

7. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors: S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1982-08 Impact factor: 13.506

8. Comparison of the coding of death certificates related to cancer in seven countries.

Authors: C Percy; A Dolman
Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 1978 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792

9. Psychosocial aspects of mastectomy: I. the women's perspective.

Authors: K R Jamison; D K Wellisch; R O Pasnau
Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1978-04 Impact factor: 18.112

10. Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the coronary drug project.

Authors:
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1980-10-30 Impact factor: 91.245

255 in total

Review 1. Improving outcomes in breast cancer for low and middle income countries.

Authors: C H Yip; I Buccimazza; M Hartman; S V S Deo; P S Y Cheung
Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.352

2. Joint Statement by the Gynecologic Radiology Study Group (AGR), the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the German Society for Senology (DGS) and the Professional Association of Gynecologists (BVF).

Authors: H Junkermann; D Wallwiener; R Schulz-Wendtland; C Albring
Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.915

The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

1. Mammography screening: time to reevaluate its impact?

2. Number needed to screen: appropriate use of this new basis for screening mammography guidelines.

3. The incidence of advanced breast cancer in the West Midlands, United Kingdom.

4. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.

5. Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: time to tackle an underappreciated harm.

6. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

7. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

8. Comparison of the coding of death certificates related to cancer in seven countries.

9. Psychosocial aspects of mastectomy: I. the women's perspective.

10. Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the coronary drug project.

Review 1. Improving outcomes in breast cancer for low and middle income countries.

2. Joint Statement by the Gynecologic Radiology Study Group (AGR), the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the German Society for Senology (DGS) and the Professional Association of Gynecologists (BVF).

3. Image toggling saves time in mammography.

4. Value of audits in breast cancer screening quality assurance programmes.

5. Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography.

Review 6. Current and future trends in photoacoustic breast imaging.

Review 7. Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness: A Review of Literature.

8. X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation.

9. CoCl₂ increases the expression of hypoxic markers HIF-1α, VEGF and CXCR4 in breast cancer MCF-7 cells.

10. Breast Cancer in Nepal: Current status and future directions.