Literature DB >> 20010429

A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries.

Sven Törnberg1, Levent Kemetli, Nieves Ascunce, Solveig Hofvind, Ahti Anttila, Brigitte Sèradour, Eugenio Paci, Cathrine Guldenfels, Edward Azavedo, Alfonso Frigerio, Vitor Rodrigues, Antonio Ponti.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess detection rates and interval breast cancer (IC) rates from eight programmes in the European Breast Cancer Screening Network. A common data collection protocol was used to explore differences in IC rates among programmes and discuss their potential determinants. Pooled analysis was used to describe IC rates by age, compliance in screening, recall rate, screening detection (SD) rate and expected breast cancer incidence. Participation in screening averaged 77.9% (range 42.6-88.7%), recall rate 5.4% (range 3.3-17.7%) in the initial and 3.4% (range 1.8-8.9%) in the subsequent screening rounds, and SD rate was 60.4 (range 41.6-91) per 10 000 women in initial and 38.5 (range 31.3-62.6) in subsequent screens. IC rate during first 12 months after screening was 5.9 (range 2.1-7.3) per 10 000 women screened negative and 12.6 (range 6.3-15) in the second year of the interval. IC comprised 28% of the IC and SD cancers. The ratio between IC rate and expected incidence was 0.29 for the first 12 months and 0.63 for the 13-24 months period. Sensitivity was higher for the ages 60-69 years and for initial tests than subsequent tests. There were distinct differences in the IC rates between programmes. The results of this study reveal large variations in screening sensitivity and performance. Pooled evaluation of some process indicators within the European breast cancer screening programmes proved to be feasible and is likely to be useful for the future, particularly if it is performed regularly and extensively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20010429     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833548ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  27 in total

1.  [Mammography screening in Germany. Current results and future challenges].

Authors:  K Bock; S Heywang-Köbrunner; L Regitz-Jedermann; G Hecht; V Kääb-Sanyal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density.

Authors:  Stefanie Weigel; W Heindel; J Heidrich; H-W Hense; O Heidinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Screening for cervical and breast cancer].

Authors:  J Wilm; S Schüler-Toprak; O Ortmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Jules H Sumkin; Marie A Ganott; Denise M Chough; Victor J Catullo; Margarita L Zuley; Dilip D Shinde; Christiane M Hakim; Andriy I Bandos; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Digital mammography screening: how many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment?

Authors:  Stefanie Weigel; Cornelis Biesheuvel; Shoma Berkemeyer; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Mammography Screening - as of 2013.

Authors:  S Heywang-Koebrunner; K Bock; W Heindel; G Hecht; L Regitz-Jedermann; A Hacker; V Kaeaeb-Sanyal
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Implementation of the German Mammography Screening Program (German MSP) and First Results for Initial Examinations, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Daniela Malek; Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.

Authors:  Mattie Salim; Erik Wåhlin; Karin Dembrower; Edward Azavedo; Theodoros Foukakis; Yue Liu; Kevin Smith; Martin Eklund; Fredrik Strand
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia.

Authors:  Oliver Heidinger; Wolf Ulrich Batzler; Volker Krieg; Stefanie Weigel; Cornelis Biesheuvel; Walter Heindel; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell; David L Conover
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.