Literature DB >> 22811439

Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Sweden.

P Autier1, A Koechlin, M Smans, L Vatten, M Boniol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Swedish women aged 40-69 years were gradually offered regular mammography screening since 1974, and nationwide coverage was achieved in 1997. We hypothesized that this gradual implementation of breast cancer screening would be reflected in county-specific mortality patterns during the last 20 years.
METHODS: Using data from the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare from 1960 to 2009, we used joinpoint regression to analyze breast cancer mortality trends in women aged 40 years and older (1,286,000 women in 1995-1996). Poisson regression models were used to compare observed mortality trends with expected trends if screening had resulted in breast cancer mortality reductions of 10%, 20%, or 30% among women screened during 18 years of follow-up after the introduction of screening. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: From 1972 to 2009, breast cancer mortality rates in Swedish women aged 40 years and older declined by 0.98% annually, from 68.4 to 42.8 per 100,000, and it continuously declined in 14 of the 21 Swedish counties. In three counties, breast cancer mortality declined sharply during or soon after the implementation of screening; in two counties, a steep decline started at least 5 years after screening was introduced; and in two counties, breast cancer mortality increased after screening started. In counties in which screening started in 1974-1978, mortality trends during the next 18 years were similar to those before screening started, and in counties in which screening started in 1986-1987, mortality increased by approximately 12% (P = .007) after the introduction of screening compared with previous trends. In counties in which screening started in 1987-1988 and in 1989-1990, mortality declined by approximately 5% (P = .001) and 8% (P < .001), respectively, after the introduction of screening. Conclusion County-specific mortality statistics in Sweden are consistent with studies that have reported limited or no impact of screening on mortality from breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22811439     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  20 in total

1.  Differences in subtype distribution between screen-detected and symptomatic invasive breast cancer and their impact on survival.

Authors:  N Kobayashi; M Hikichi; K Ushimado; A Sugioka; Y Kiriyama; M Kuroda; T Utsumi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Calcium intake and bone mineral density as an example of non-linearity and threshold analysis.

Authors:  L P Breitling
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Implementation of the German Mammography Screening Program (German MSP) and First Results for Initial Examinations, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Daniela Malek; Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Breast cancer mortality trends in England and the assessment of the effectiveness of mammography screening: population-based study.

Authors:  Toqir K Mukhtar; David Rg Yeates; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Occult breast tumor reservoir: biological properties and clinical significance.

Authors:  Richard J Santen; Wei Yue; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.869

8.  Screening mammography: what good is it and how can we know if it works?

Authors:  Michael W Vannier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Diagnostic codes of cancer in Skåne healthcare register: a validation study using individual-level data in southern Sweden.

Authors:  Qing Shen; Maria E C Schelin; Fang Fang; Anna Jöud
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Improving the Ability of Deep Neural Networks to Use Information from Multiple Views in Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Stanisław Jastrzębski; Jungkyu Park; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res       Date:  2020-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.