PURPOSE: This paper summarizes the development of a high-power distributed x-ray source, or "multisource," designed for inverse-geometry computed tomography (CT) applications [see B. De Man et al., "Multisource inverse-geometry CT. Part I. System concept and development," Med. Phys. 43, 4607-4616 (2016)]. The paper presents the evolution of the source architecture, component design (anode, emitter, beam optics, control electronics, high voltage insulator), and experimental validation. METHODS: Dispenser cathode emitters were chosen as electron sources. A modular design was adopted, with eight electron emitters (two rows of four emitters) per module, wherein tungsten targets were brazed onto copper anode blocks-one anode block per module. A specialized ceramic connector provided high voltage standoff capability and cooling oil flow to the anode. A matrix topology and low-noise electronic controls provided switching of the emitters. RESULTS: Four modules (32 x-ray sources in two rows of 16) have been successfully integrated into a single vacuum vessel and operated on an inverse-geometry computed tomography system. Dispenser cathodes provided high beam current (>1000 mA) in pulse mode, and the electrostatic lenses focused the current beam to a small optical focal spot size (0.5 × 1.4 mm). Controlled emitter grid voltage allowed the beam current to be varied for each source, providing the ability to modulate beam current across the fan of the x-ray beam, denoted as a virtual bowtie filter. The custom designed controls achieved x-ray source switching in <1 μs. The cathode-grounded source was operated successfully up to 120 kV. CONCLUSIONS: A high-power, distributed x-ray source for inverse-geometry CT applications was successfully designed, fabricated, and operated. Future embodiments may increase the number of spots and utilize fast read out detectors to increase the x-ray flux magnitude further, while still staying within the stationary target inherent thermal limitations.
PURPOSE: This paper summarizes the development of a high-power distributed x-ray source, or "multisource," designed for inverse-geometry computed tomography (CT) applications [see B. De Man et al., "Multisource inverse-geometry CT. Part I. System concept and development," Med. Phys. 43, 4607-4616 (2016)]. The paper presents the evolution of the source architecture, component design (anode, emitter, beam optics, control electronics, high voltage insulator), and experimental validation. METHODS: Dispenser cathode emitters were chosen as electron sources. A modular design was adopted, with eight electron emitters (two rows of four emitters) per module, wherein tungsten targets were brazed onto copper anode blocks-one anode block per module. A specialized ceramic connector provided high voltage standoff capability and cooling oil flow to the anode. A matrix topology and low-noise electronic controls provided switching of the emitters. RESULTS: Four modules (32 x-ray sources in two rows of 16) have been successfully integrated into a single vacuum vessel and operated on an inverse-geometry computed tomography system. Dispenser cathodes provided high beam current (>1000 mA) in pulse mode, and the electrostatic lenses focused the current beam to a small optical focal spot size (0.5 × 1.4 mm). Controlled emitter grid voltage allowed the beam current to be varied for each source, providing the ability to modulate beam current across the fan of the x-ray beam, denoted as a virtual bowtie filter. The custom designed controls achieved x-ray source switching in <1 μs. The cathode-grounded source was operated successfully up to 120 kV. CONCLUSIONS: A high-power, distributed x-ray source for inverse-geometry CT applications was successfully designed, fabricated, and operated. Future embodiments may increase the number of spots and utilize fast read out detectors to increase the x-ray flux magnitude further, while still staying within the stationary target inherent thermal limitations.
Authors: Michael A Speidel; Brian P Wilfley; Josh M Star-Lack; Joseph A Heanue; Michael S Van Lysel Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jonathan S Maltz; Frank Sprenger; Jens Fuerst; Ajay Paidi; Franz Fadler; Ali R Bani-Hashemi Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: V Bogdan Neculaes; Yun Zou; Peter Zavodszky; Louis Inzinna; Xi Zhang; Kenneth Conway; Antonio Caiafa; Kristopher Frutschy; William Waters; Bruno De Man Journal: Phys Plasmas Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 2.023
Authors: Bruno De Man; Jorge Uribe; Jongduk Baek; Dan Harrison; Zhye Yin; Randy Longtin; Jaydeep Roy; Bill Waters; Colin Wilson; Jonathan Short; Lou Inzinna; Joseph Reynolds; V Bogdan Neculaes; Kristopher Frutschy; Bob Senzig; Norbert Pelc Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Bruno De Man; Jorge Uribe; Jongduk Baek; Dan Harrison; Zhye Yin; Randy Longtin; Jaydeep Roy; Bill Waters; Colin Wilson; Jonathan Short; Lou Inzinna; Joseph Reynolds; V Bogdan Neculaes; Kristopher Frutschy; Bob Senzig; Norbert Pelc Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.071