Bruno De Man1, Jorge Uribe2, Jongduk Baek3, Dan Harrison1, Zhye Yin1, Randy Longtin4, Jaydeep Roy4, Bill Waters5, Colin Wilson6, Jonathan Short7, Lou Inzinna6, Joseph Reynolds8, V Bogdan Neculaes6, Kristopher Frutschy4, Bob Senzig9, Norbert Pelc10. 1. CT Systems and Applications Laboratory, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309. 2. Functional Imaging Laboratory, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309. 3. School of Integrated Technology, Yonsei University, Incheon 406-840, South Korea. 4. Mechanical Systems Technologies, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309. 5. Design and Development Shops, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309. 6. High Energy Physics Laboratory, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309. 7. Detector Laboratory, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309. 8. High Frequency Power Electronics Laboratory, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York 12309. 9. Molecular Imaging and Computed Tomography, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188. 10. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This paper presents an overview of multisource inverse-geometry computed tomography (IGCT) as well as the development of a gantry-based research prototype system. The development of the distributed x-ray source is covered in a companion paper [V. B. Neculaes et al., "Multisource inverse-geometry CT. Part II. X-ray source design and prototype," Med. Phys. 43, 4617-4627 (2016)]. While progress updates of this development have been presented at conferences and in journal papers, this paper is the first comprehensive overview of the multisource inverse-geometry CT concept and prototype. The authors also provide a review of all previous IGCT related publications. METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a gantry-based 32-source IGCT scanner with 22 cm field-of-view, 16 cm z-coverage, 1 s rotation time, 1.09 × 1.024 mm detector cell size, as low as 0.4 × 0.8 mm focal spot size and 80-140 kVp x-ray source voltage. The system is built using commercially available CT components and a custom made distributed x-ray source. The authors developed dedicated controls, calibrations, and reconstruction algorithms and evaluated the system performance using phantoms and small animals. RESULTS: The authors performed IGCT system experiments and demonstrated tube current up to 125 mA with up to 32 focal spots. The authors measured a spatial resolution of 13 lp/cm at 5% cutoff. The scatter-to-primary ratio is estimated 62% for a 32 cm water phantom at 140 kVp. The authors scanned several phantoms and small animals. The initial images have relatively high noise due to the low x-ray flux levels but minimal artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: IGCT has unique benefits in terms of dose-efficiency and cone-beam artifacts, but comes with challenges in terms of scattered radiation and x-ray flux limits. To the authors' knowledge, their prototype is the first gantry-based IGCT scanner. The authors summarized the design and implementation of the scanner and the authors presented results with phantoms and small animals.
PURPOSE: This paper presents an overview of multisource inverse-geometry computed tomography (IGCT) as well as the development of a gantry-based research prototype system. The development of the distributed x-ray source is covered in a companion paper [V. B. Neculaes et al., "Multisource inverse-geometry CT. Part II. X-ray source design and prototype," Med. Phys. 43, 4617-4627 (2016)]. While progress updates of this development have been presented at conferences and in journal papers, this paper is the first comprehensive overview of the multisource inverse-geometry CT concept and prototype. The authors also provide a review of all previous IGCT related publications. METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a gantry-based 32-source IGCT scanner with 22 cm field-of-view, 16 cm z-coverage, 1 s rotation time, 1.09 × 1.024 mm detector cell size, as low as 0.4 × 0.8 mm focal spot size and 80-140 kVp x-ray source voltage. The system is built using commercially available CT components and a custom made distributed x-ray source. The authors developed dedicated controls, calibrations, and reconstruction algorithms and evaluated the system performance using phantoms and small animals. RESULTS: The authors performed IGCT system experiments and demonstrated tube current up to 125 mA with up to 32 focal spots. The authors measured a spatial resolution of 13 lp/cm at 5% cutoff. The scatter-to-primary ratio is estimated 62% for a 32 cm water phantom at 140 kVp. The authors scanned several phantoms and small animals. The initial images have relatively high noise due to the low x-ray flux levels but minimal artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: IGCT has unique benefits in terms of dose-efficiency and cone-beam artifacts, but comes with challenges in terms of scattered radiation and x-ray flux limits. To the authors' knowledge, their prototype is the first gantry-based IGCT scanner. The authors summarized the design and implementation of the scanner and the authors presented results with phantoms and small animals.
Authors: Taly Gilat Schmidt; Josh Star-Lack; N Robert Bennett; Samuel R Mazin; Edward G Solomon; Rebecca Fahrig; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Thomas G Flohr; Cynthia H McCollough; Herbert Bruder; Martin Petersilka; Klaus Gruber; Christoph Süss; Michael Grasruck; Karl Stierstorfer; Bernhard Krauss; Rainer Raupach; Andrew N Primak; Axel Küttner; Stefan Achenbach; Christoph Becker; Andreas Kopp; Bernd M Ohnesorge Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-12-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jonathan Sperl; Dirk Beque; Bernhard Claus; Bruno De Man; Bob Senzig; Martin Brokate Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: V Bogdan Neculaes; Antonio Caiafa; Yang Cao; Bruno De Man; Peter M Edic; Kristopher Frutschy; Satish Gunturi; Lou Inzinna; Joseph Reynolds; Mark Vermilyea; David Wagner; Xi Zhang; Yun Zou; Norbert J Pelc; Brian Lounsberry Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.071