Literature DB >> 10574855

Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study.

J M Belizán1, F Althabe, F C Barros, S Alexander.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidences of caesarean sections in Latin American countries and correlate these with socioeconomic, demographic, and healthcare variables.
DESIGN: Descriptive and ecological study.
SETTING: 19 Latin American countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: National estimates of caesarean section rates in each country.
RESULTS: Seven countries had caesarean section rates below 15%. The remaining 12 countries had rates above 15% (range 16.8% to 40.0%). These 12 countries account for 81% of the deliveries in the region. A positive and significant correlation was observed between the gross national product per capita and rate of caesarean section (r(s)=0.746), and higher rates were observed in private hospitals than in public ones. Taking 15% as a medically justified accepted rate, over 850 000 unnecessary caesarean sections are performed each year in the region.
CONCLUSIONS: The reported figures represent an unnecessary increased risk for young women and their babies. From the economic perspective, this is a burden to health systems that work with limited budgets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10574855      PMCID: PMC28283          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

1.  A sort of progress.

Authors:  C de Costa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Cesarean birth trends in Chile, 1986 to 1994.

Authors:  S F Murray; F Serani Pradenas
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  [Cesarean delivery in Italy: a European record].

Authors:  F Ballacci; E Medda; A Pinnelli; A Spinelli
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  1996 Apr-Sep       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  What is the right number of caesarean sections?

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery.

Authors:  R Al-Mufti; A McCarthy; N M Fisk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Cesarean section in Brazil.

Authors:  B Janowitz; M S Nakamura; F E Lins; M L Brown; D Clopton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable?

Authors:  C Wilkinson; G McIlwaine; C Boulton-Jones; S Cole
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-01

8.  Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil.

Authors:  F C Barros; J P Vaughan; C G Victora; S R Huttly
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  "Alone, I wouldn't have known what to do": a qualitative study on social support during labor and delivery in Mexico.

Authors:  L Campero; C García; C Díaz; O Ortiz; S Reynoso; A Langer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons from a "breakthrough series" collaborative.

Authors:  B L Flamm; D M Berwick; A Kabcenell
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.689

View more
  79 in total

1.  Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue.

Authors:  K Groom; S P Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-15

2.  Caesarean section rate in England and Wales. Maybe midwives were too busy.

Authors:  Woody Caan; Peter Messent
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-23

3.  Demographic and Health Surveys: caesarean section rates in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Pierre Buekens; Siân Curtis; Silvia Alayón
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-18

4.  Making sense of rising caesarean section rates.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-25

5.  The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Ernesto Friedrich de Lima Amaral; Aline Nogueira Menezes Mourão
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008.

Authors:  Xing Lin Feng; Ling Xu; Yan Guo; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 7.  Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section.

Authors:  D Jacobs-Jokhan; G Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

8.  Global maternal and child health.

Authors:  Pierre Buekens
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-03

9.  Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.

Authors:  Herng-Ching Lin; Sudha Xirasagar; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?

Authors:  B Anthony Armson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.