Literature DB >> 27422518

Genetics of Amino Acid Taste and Appetite.

Alexander A Bachmanov1, Natalia P Bosak2, John I Glendinning3, Masashi Inoue4, Xia Li2, Satoshi Manita4, Stuart A McCaughey2, Yuko Murata5, Danielle R Reed2, Michael G Tordoff2, Gary K Beauchamp6.   

Abstract

The consumption of amino acids by animals is controlled by both oral and postoral mechanisms. We used a genetic approach to investigate these mechanisms. Our studies have shown that inbred mouse strains differ in voluntary amino acid consumption, and these differences depend on sensory and nutritive properties of amino acids. Like humans, mice perceive some amino acids as having a sweet (sucrose-like) taste and others as having an umami (glutamate-like) taste. Mouse strain differences in the consumption of some sweet-tasting amino acids (d-phenylalanine, d-tryptophan, and l-proline) are associated with polymorphisms of a taste receptor, type 1, member 3 gene (Tas1r3), and involve differential peripheral taste responsiveness. Strain differences in the consumption of some other sweet-tasting amino acids (glycine, l-alanine, l-glutamine, and l-threonine) do not depend on Tas1r3 polymorphisms and so must be due to allelic variation in other, as yet unknown, genes involved in sweet taste. Strain differences in the consumption of l-glutamate may depend on postingestive rather than taste mechanisms. Thus, genes and physiologic mechanisms responsible for strain differences in the consumption of each amino acid depend on the nature of its taste and postingestive properties. Overall, mouse strain differences in amino acid taste and appetite have a complex genetic architecture. In addition to the Tas1r3 gene, these differences depend on other genes likely involved in determining the taste and postingestive effects of amino acids. The identification of these genes may lead to the discovery of novel mechanisms that regulate amino acid taste and appetite.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; consumption; gustatory nerves; inbred strain; intake; mouse; preference; sweet; umami

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27422518      PMCID: PMC4942865          DOI: 10.3945/an.115.011270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  80 in total

1.  MSG intake and preference in mice are influenced by prior testing experience.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Rachel Weintraub; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Rapid entry of bitter and sweet tastants into liposomes and taste cells: implications for signal transduction.

Authors:  I Peri; H Mamrud-Brains; S Rodin; V Krizhanovsky; Y Shai; S Nir; M Naim
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  Intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice: a genetic analysis.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Essential amino acid deficiency enhances long-term intake but not short-term licking of the required nutrient.

Authors:  S Markison; D W Gietzen; A C Spector
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Conditioned flavor preference learning by intragastric administration of L-glutamate in rats.

Authors:  Akira Uematsu; Tomokazu Tsurugizawa; Takashi Kondoh; Kunio Torii
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Gustatory effectiveness of amino acids in mice: behavioral and neurophysiological studies.

Authors:  K Iwasaki; T Kasahara; M Sato
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1985-04

8.  Strain differences in consumption of saline solutions by mice.

Authors:  G K Beauchamp; A S Fisher
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-07

9.  Electrophysiological and behavioral studies on the taste of umami substances in the rat.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; R Matsuo; Y Fujimoto; I Fukunaga; A Miyasaka; T Imoto
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1991-05

10.  Differences in postingestive metabolism of glutamate and glycine between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Hong Ji; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.107

View more
  6 in total

1.  Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Lindsey A Schier
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Type of infant formula increases early weight gain and impacts energy balance: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Loma Inamdar; Naomi Pressman; Joan I Schall; Mia A Papas; Dale Schoeller; Virginia A Stallings; Jillian C Trabulsi
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  The teleost fish, blue gourami Trichopodus trichopterus, distinguishes the taste of chemically similar substances.

Authors:  Alexander O Kasumyan; Grigoryi E Mouromtsev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Red Light Regulates the Metabolite Biosynthesis in the Leaves of "Huangjinya" Through Amino Acid and Phenylpropanoid Metabolisms.

Authors:  Qingping Ma; Laichao Song; Zhanhai Niu; Jingshan Li; Yu Wang; Haiwei Sun; Zhihong Ren; Hongxia Zhao; Shangjing Guo; Zhaotang Ding
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Effects of High-Pressure, Hydrothermal, and Enzyme-Assisted Treatment on the Taste and Flavor Profile of Water-Soluble Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Extract.

Authors:  Dong-Geon Nam; Mina Kim; Jeong-Sook Choe; Ae-Jin Choi
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-10

6.  Bitter, Sweet, Salty, Sour and Umami Taste Perception Decreases with Age: Sex-Specific Analysis, Modulation by Genetic Variants and Taste-Preference Associations in 18 to 80 Year-Old Subjects.

Authors:  Rocio Barragán; Oscar Coltell; Olga Portolés; Eva M Asensio; José V Sorlí; Carolina Ortega-Azorín; José I González; Carmen Sáiz; Rebeca Fernández-Carrión; Jose M Ordovas; Dolores Corella
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.