Literature DB >> 22776625

MSG intake and preference in mice are influenced by prior testing experience.

Karen Ackroff1, Rachel Weintraub, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

Monosodium glutamate (MSG), the prototypical umami substance, is used as a flavor enhancer in many foods, but when presented alone is often only weakly attractive. Yet with experience mice will develop strong preferences for MSG solution over water. The present experiments explored the conditions that change indifference to preference for MSG. C57BL/6J mice were given a series of 2-day two-bottle tests with water vs. an ascending series of MSG concentrations (0.1-450 mM) to assess preference and intake. Naive mice were indifferent to all concentrations, but following forced one-bottle exposure to 300 mM MSG they preferred most concentrations and consumed more MSG. Exposure to 100mM MSG also increased subsequent MSG preference but not intake. Experience with other nutritive solutions (8% sucrose, 8% Polycose, 8% casein hydrolysate, and isocaloric 3.5% soybean oil emulsion) also enhanced subsequent MSG preference and intake. Polycose and sucrose experience were almost as effective as MSG experience. However, not all sapid solutions were effective; 0.8% sucralose and 10mM MSG exposure did not alter subsequent MSG preference. The generality of the preexposure effect was tested by offering an ascending series (0.1-100 mM) of inosine monophosphate (IMP), another umami substance; initial indifference was converted to preference after forced exposure to 300 mM MSG. Together these results suggest that a combination of oral and post-oral effects may be responsible for the experience effect, with MSG itself the most potent stimulus. A final experiment revealed that MSG preference in naïve mice is enhanced by presenting the MSG and water drinking spouts far apart rather than side by side. Thus the preferences for umami solutions in mice are subject to influence from prior tastant experience as well spout position, which should be taken into account when studying acceptance of taste solutions in mice.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22776625     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  9 in total

1.  An Examination of the Role of L-Glutamate and Inosine 5'-Monophosphate in Hedonic Taste-Guided Behavior by Mice Lacking the T1R1 + T1R3 Receptor.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Taste dysfunction in BTBR mice due to a mutation of Itpr3, the inositol triphosphate receptor 3 gene.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Hillary T Ellis
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Monosodium glutamate-associated alterations in open field, anxiety-related and conditioned place preference behaviours in mice.

Authors:  Olakunle James Onaolapo; Olaleye Samuel Aremu; Adejoke Yetunde Onaolapo
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Flavor Preferences Conditioned by Dietary Glutamate.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 5.  Genetics of Amino Acid Taste and Appetite.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; John I Glendinning; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Satoshi Manita; Stuart A McCaughey; Yuko Murata; Danielle R Reed; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  Food experience-induced taste desensitization modulated by the Drosophila TRPL channel.

Authors:  Yali V Zhang; Rakesh P Raghuwanshi; Wei L Shen; Craig Montell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  High Dietary Sugar Reshapes Sweet Taste to Promote Feeding Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christina E May; Anoumid Vaziri; Yong Qi Lin; Olga Grushko; Morteza Khabiri; Qiao-Ping Wang; Kristina J Holme; Scott D Pletcher; Peter L Freddolino; G Gregory Neely; Monica Dus
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 9.995

8.  Taste preference changes throughout different life stages in male rats.

Authors:  Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto; Takashi Yamamoto; Katsura Ueda; Michiko Nakatsuka; Shunji Kumabe; Tadashi Inui; Yasutomo Iwai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diet-induced obesity reduces the responsiveness of the peripheral taste receptor cells.

Authors:  Amanda B Maliphol; Deborah J Garth; Kathryn F Medler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.