Literature DB >> 27421468

Advances in in vivo EPR Tooth BIOdosimetry: Meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event.

Ann Barry Flood1, Benjamin B Williams2,3, Wilson Schreiber2, Gaixin Du2, Victoria A Wood2, Maciej M Kmiec2, Sergey V Petryakov2, Eugene Demidenko4, Harold M Swartz2,3.   

Abstract

Several important recent advances in the development and evolution of in vivo Tooth Biodosimetry using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) allow its performance to meet or exceed the U.S. targeted requirements for accuracy and ease of operation and throughput in a large-scale radiation event. Ergonomically based changes to the magnet, coupled with the development of rotation of the magnet and advanced software to automate collection of data, have made it easier and faster to make a measurement. From start to finish, measurements require a total elapsed time of 5 min, with data acquisition taking place in less than 3 min. At the same time, the accuracy of the data for triage of large populations has improved, as indicated using the metrics of sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve. Applying these standards to the intended population, EPR in vivo Tooth Biodosimetry has approximately the same diagnostic accuracy as the purported 'gold standard' (dicentric chromosome assay). Other improvements include miniaturisation of the spectrometer, leading to the creation of a significantly lighter and more compact prototype that is suitable for transporting for Point of Care (POC) operation and that can be operated off a single standard power outlet. Additional advancements in the resonator, including use of a disposable sensing loop attached to the incisor tooth, have resulted in a biodosimetry method where measurements can be made quickly with a simple 5-step workflow and by people needing only a few minutes of training (which can be built into the instrument as a training video). In sum, recent advancements allow this prototype to meet or exceed the US Federal Government's recommended targets for POC biodosimetry in large-scale events.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27421468      PMCID: PMC5225975          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  15 in total

1.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Rapid radiation dose assessment for radiological public health emergencies: roles of NIAID and BARDA.

Authors:  Marcy B Grace; Brian R Moyer; Joanna Prasher; Kenneth D Cliffer; Narayani Ramakrishnan; Joseph Kaminski; C Norman Coleman; Ronald G Manning; Bert W Maidment; Richard Hatchett
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Advances in a framework to compare bio-dosimetry methods for triage in large-scale radiation events.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Eugene Demidenko; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Medical management of radiation injuries: current approaches.

Authors:  M E Berger; D M Christensen; P C Lowry; O W Jones; A L Wiley
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.611

5.  IN-VIVO RADIATION DOSIMETRY USING PORTABLE L BAND EPR: ON-SITE MEASUREMENT OF VOLUNTEERS IN FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN.

Authors:  Minoru Miyake; Yasuhiro Nakai; Ichiro Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Hirata; Naoki Kunugita; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  ROC Analysis for Evaluation of Radiation Biodosimetry Technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Eugene Demidenko; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  In vivo dosimetry by electron spin resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  J M Brady; N O Aarestad; H M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  In vivo EPR tooth dosimetry for triage after a radiation event involving large populations.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Ildar Salikhov; Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Kevin Rychert; Gaixin Du; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  Radiation injury after a nuclear detonation: medical consequences and the need for scarce resources allocation.

Authors:  Andrea L DiCarlo; Carmen Maher; John L Hick; Dan Hanfling; Nicholas Dainiak; Nelson Chao; Judith L Bader; C Norman Coleman; David M Weinstock
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.385

10.  Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations.

Authors:  Julie M Sullivan; Pataje G S Prasanna; Marcy B Grace; Lynne K Wathen; Rodney L Wallace; John F Koerner; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Metabolomic applications in radiation biodosimetry: exploring radiation effects through small molecules.

Authors:  Evan L Pannkuk; Albert J Fornace; Evagelia C Laiakis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  L Band EPR Tooth Dosimetry for Heavy Ion Irradiation.

Authors:  Ichiro Yamaguchi; Hitoshi Sato; Hiraku Kawamura; Tsuyoshi Hamano; Hiroshi Yoshii; Mitsuru Suda; Minoru Miyake; Naoki Kunugita
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  ROC Analysis for Evaluation of Radiation Biodosimetry Technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Eugene Demidenko; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Using Stable Free Radicals to Obtain Unique and Clinically Useful Data In Vivo in Human Subjects.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 5.  Evolution and Optimization of Tooth Models for Testing In Vivo EPR Tooth Dosimetry.

Authors:  Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Roberto Javier Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams; Gaixin Du; Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 6.  Saving normal tissues - a goal for the ages.

Authors:  Angela M Groves; Jacqueline P Williams
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Guidance to Transfer 'Bench-Ready' Medical Technology into Usual Clinical Practice: Case Study - Sensors and Spectrometer Used in EPR Oximetry.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Victoria A Wood; Wilson Schreiber; Benjamin B Williams; Bernard Gallez; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Development of a novel mouth model as an alternative tool to test the effectiveness of an in vivo EPR dosimetry system.

Authors:  Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Roberto Javier Nicolalde; Paul Calderon; Gaixin Du; Benjamin B Williams; Masaichi-Chang-Il Lee; Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.609

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.