Evan L Pannkuk1, Albert J Fornace2,3, Evagelia C Laiakis3. 1. a Tumor Biology Program , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University , Washington DC , USA. 2. b Molecular Oncology , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University , Washington DC , USA. 3. c Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology , Georgetown University , Washington DC , USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Exposure of the general population to ionizing radiation has increased in the past decades, primarily due to long distance travel and medical procedures. On the other hand, accidental exposures, nuclear accidents, and elevated threats of terrorism with the potential detonation of a radiological dispersal device or improvised nuclear device in a major city, all have led to increased needs for rapid biodosimetry and assessment of exposure to different radiation qualities and scenarios. Metabolomics, the qualitative and quantitative assessment of small molecules in a given biological specimen, has emerged as a promising technology to allow for rapid determination of an individual's exposure level and metabolic phenotype. Advancements in mass spectrometry techniques have led to untargeted (discovery phase, global assessment) and targeted (quantitative phase) methods not only to identify biomarkers of radiation exposure, but also to assess general perturbations of metabolism with potential long-term consequences, such as cancer, cardiovascular, and pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolomics of radiation exposure has provided a highly informative snapshot of metabolic dysregulation. Biomarkers in easily accessible biofluids and biospecimens (urine, blood, saliva, sebum, fecal material) from mouse, rat, and minipig models, to non-human primates and humans have provided the basis for determination of a radiation signature to assess the need for medical intervention. Here we provide a comprehensive description of the current status of radiation metabolomic studies for the purpose of rapid high-throughput radiation biodosimetry in easily accessible biofluids and discuss future directions of radiation metabolomics research.
PURPOSE: Exposure of the general population to ionizing radiation has increased in the past decades, primarily due to long distance travel and medical procedures. On the other hand, accidental exposures, nuclear accidents, and elevated threats of terrorism with the potential detonation of a radiological dispersal device or improvised nuclear device in a major city, all have led to increased needs for rapid biodosimetry and assessment of exposure to different radiation qualities and scenarios. Metabolomics, the qualitative and quantitative assessment of small molecules in a given biological specimen, has emerged as a promising technology to allow for rapid determination of an individual's exposure level and metabolic phenotype. Advancements in mass spectrometry techniques have led to untargeted (discovery phase, global assessment) and targeted (quantitative phase) methods not only to identify biomarkers of radiation exposure, but also to assess general perturbations of metabolism with potential long-term consequences, such as cancer, cardiovascular, and pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolomics of radiation exposure has provided a highly informative snapshot of metabolic dysregulation. Biomarkers in easily accessible biofluids and biospecimens (urine, blood, saliva, sebum, fecal material) from mouse, rat, and minipig models, to non-human primates and humans have provided the basis for determination of a radiation signature to assess the need for medical intervention. Here we provide a comprehensive description of the current status of radiation metabolomic studies for the purpose of rapid high-throughput radiation biodosimetry in easily accessible biofluids and discuss future directions of radiation metabolomics research.
Authors: Jace W Jones; Gregory Tudor; Fei Li; Yan Tong; Barry Katz; Ann M Farese; Thomas J MacVittie; Catherine Booth; Maureen A Kane Journal: Health Phys Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Zhidan Chen; Stephen L Coy; Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Adam B Hall; Albert J Fornace; Paul Vouros Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz Journal: Health Phys Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Jace W Jones; Alexander Bennett; Claire L Carter; Gregory Tudor; Kim G Hankey; Ann M Farese; Catherine Booth; Thomas J MacVittie; Maureen A Kane Journal: Health Phys Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Junru Wang; Lijian Shao; Howard P Hendrickson; Liya Liu; Jianhui Chang; Yi Luo; John Seng; Mylene Pouliot; Simon Authier; Daohong Zhou; William Allaben; Martin Hauer-Jensen Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Caroline H Johnson; Andrew D Patterson; Kristopher W Krausz; John F Kalinich; John B Tyburski; Dong Wook Kang; Hans Luecke; Frank J Gonzalez; William F Blakely; Jeffrey R Idle Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Zhidan Chen; Stephen L Coy; Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Albert J Fornace; Paul Vouros Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Jace W Jones; Zachary Clifford; Fei Li; Gregory L Tudor; Ann M Farese; Catherine Booth; Thomas J MacVittie; Maureen A Kane Journal: Health Phys Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Evagelia C Laiakis; Evan L Pannkuk; Siddheshwar Kisan Chauthe; Yi-Wen Wang; Ming Lian; Tytus D Mak; Christopher A Barker; Giuseppe Astarita; Albert J Fornace Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Hongxiang Mu; Jing Sun; Linwei Li; Jie Yin; Nan Hu; Weichao Zhao; Dexin Ding; Lan Yi Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2018-04-29 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Kirandeep Gill; Shreyans K Jain; Khyati Y Mehta; Denise Nishita; Kim Bujold; James Bakke; Janet Gahagen; Simon Authier; Polly Chang; Albert J Fornace Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Evagelia C Laiakis; Denise Nishita; Kim Bujold; Meth M Jayatilake; James Bakke; Janet Gahagen; Simon Authier; Polly Chang; Albert J Fornace Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Albert J Fornace; Oluseyi O Fatanmi; Vijay K Singh Journal: Health Phys Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Nicholas B Vera; Stephen L Coy; Evagelia C Laiakis; Albert J Fornace; Michelle Clasquin; Christopher A Barker; Jeffrey A Pfefferkorn; Paul Vouros Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.109