Literature DB >> 27412513

ROC Analysis for Evaluation of Radiation Biodosimetry Technologies.

Benjamin B Williams1,2, Ann Barry Flood2, Eugene Demidenko3, Harold M Swartz4,2.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is a fundamental tool used for the evaluation and comparison of diagnostic systems that provides estimates of the combinations of sensitivity and specificity that can be achieved with a given technique. Along with critical considerations of practical limitations, such as throughput and time to availability of results, ROC analyses can be applied to provide meaningful assessments and comparisons of available biodosimetry methods. Accordingly, guidance from the Food and Drug Administration to evaluate biodosimetry devices recommends using ROC analysis. However, the existing literature for the numerous biodosimetry methods that have been developed to address the needs for triage either do not contain ROC analyses or present ROC analyses where the dose distributions of the study samples are not representative of the populations to be screened. The use of non-representative sample populations can result in a significant spectrum bias, where estimated performance metrics do not accurately characterize the true performance under real-world conditions. Particularly, in scenarios where a large group of people is screened because they were potentially exposed in a large-scale radiation event, directly measured population data do not exist. However, a number of complex simulations have been performed and reported in the literature that provide estimates of the required dose distributions. Based on these simulations and reported data about the output and uncertainties of biodosimetry assays, we illustrate how ROC curves can be generated that incorporate a realistic representative sample. A technique to generate ROC curves for biodosimetry data is presented along with representative ROC curves, summary statistics and discussion based on published data for triage-ready electron paramagnetic resonance in vivo tooth dosimetry, the dicentric chromosome assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. We argue that this methodology should be adopted generally to evaluate the performance of radiation biodosimetry screening assays so that they can be compared in the context of their intended use.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27412513      PMCID: PMC5225982          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  10 in total

1.  Laboratory intercomparison of gene expression assays.

Authors:  C Badie; S Kabacik; Y Balagurunathan; N Bernard; M Brengues; G Faggioni; R Greither; F Lista; A Peinnequin; T Poyot; F Herodin; A Missel; B Terbrueggen; F Zenhausern; K Rothkamm; V Meineke; H Braselmann; C Beinke; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Laboratory intercomparison of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.

Authors:  H Romm; S Barnard; H Boulay-Greene; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; M Franco; F Herodin; A Jones; U Kulka; F Lista; P Martigne; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; K Rothkamm; H Thierens; M Valente; V Vandersickel; A Vral; H Braselmann; V Meineke; M Abend; C Beinke
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis assay.

Authors:  C Beinke; S Barnard; H Boulay-Greene; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; F Herodin; A Jones; U Kulka; F Lista; D Lloyd; P Martigne; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; H Romm; K Rothkamm; M Valente; V Meineke; H Braselmann; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Rapid radiation dose assessment for radiological public health emergencies: roles of NIAID and BARDA.

Authors:  Marcy B Grace; Brian R Moyer; Joanna Prasher; Kenneth D Cliffer; Narayani Ramakrishnan; Joseph Kaminski; C Norman Coleman; Ronald G Manning; Bert W Maidment; Richard Hatchett
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 5.  Advances in in vivo EPR Tooth BIOdosimetry: Meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Benjamin B Williams; Wilson Schreiber; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Wood; Maciej M Kmiec; Sergey V Petryakov; Eugene Demidenko; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Accurate gene expression-based biodosimetry using a minimal set of human gene transcripts.

Authors:  James D Tucker; Michael C Joiner; Robert A Thomas; William E Grever; Marina V Bakhmutsky; Chantelle N Chinkhota; Joseph M Smolinski; George W Divine; Gregory W Auner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  In vivo EPR tooth dosimetry for triage after a radiation event involving large populations.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Ildar Salikhov; Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Kevin Rychert; Gaixin Du; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group.

Authors:  Jamie K Waselenko; Thomas J MacVittie; William F Blakely; Nicki Pesik; Albert L Wiley; William E Dickerson; Horace Tsu; Dennis L Confer; C Norman Coleman; Thomas Seed; Patrick Lowry; James O Armitage; Nicholas Dainiak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays.

Authors:  K Rothkamm; C Beinke; H Romm; C Badie; Y Balagurunathan; S Barnard; N Bernard; H Boulay-Greene; M Brengues; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; R Greither; F Herodin; A Jones; S Kabacik; T Knie; U Kulka; F Lista; P Martigne; A Missel; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; A Peinnequin; T Poyot; U Roessler; H Scherthan; B Terbrueggen; H Thierens; M Valente; A Vral; F Zenhausern; V Meineke; H Braselmann; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations.

Authors:  Julie M Sullivan; Pataje G S Prasanna; Marcy B Grace; Lynne K Wathen; Rodney L Wallace; John F Koerner; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.316

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in in vivo EPR Tooth BIOdosimetry: Meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Benjamin B Williams; Wilson Schreiber; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Wood; Maciej M Kmiec; Sergey V Petryakov; Eugene Demidenko; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 2.  Evolution and Optimization of Tooth Models for Testing In Vivo EPR Tooth Dosimetry.

Authors:  Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Roberto Javier Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams; Gaixin Du; Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  DNA damage response in peripheral mouse blood leukocytes in vivo after variable, low-dose rate exposure.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Monica Pujol-Canadell; Maria Taveras; Guy Garty; Jay Perrier; Carlos Bueno-Beti; Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner; Helen C Turner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Development of the FAST-DOSE assay system for high-throughput biodosimetry and radiation triage.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Younghyun Lee; Igor Shuryak; Monica Pujol Canadell; Maria Taveras; Jay R Perrier; Bezalel A Bacon; Matthew A Rodrigues; Richard Kowalski; Christopher Capaccio; David J Brenner; Helen C Turner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Identification of Potential Biomarkers of Radiation Exposure in Blood Cells by Capillary Electrophoresis Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Lue Sun; Yohei Inaba; Norie Kanzaki; Mahesh Bekal; Koichi Chida; Takashi Moritake
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.