Literature DB >> 24162058

Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations.

Julie M Sullivan1, Pataje G S Prasanna, Marcy B Grace, Lynne K Wathen, Rodney L Wallace, John F Koerner, C Norman Coleman.   

Abstract

Following a mass-casualty nuclear disaster, effective medical triage has the potential to save tens of thousands of lives. In order to best use the available scarce resources, there is an urgent need for biodosimetry tools to determine an individual's radiation dose. Initial triage for radiation exposure will include location during the incident, symptoms, and physical examination. Stepwise triage will include point of care assessment of less than or greater than 2 Gy, followed by secondary assessment, possibly with high throughput screening, to further define an individual's dose. Given the multisystem nature of radiation injury, it is unlikely that any single biodosimetry assay can be used as a standalone tool to meet the surge in capacity with the timeliness and accuracy needed. As part of the national preparedness and planning for a nuclear or radiological incident, the authors reviewed the primary literature to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of biodosimetry assays currently available or under development for use in the initial and secondary triage of patients. Understanding the requirements from a response standpoint and the capability and logistics for the various assays will help inform future biodosimetry technology development and acquisition. Factors considered include: type of sample required, dose detection limit, time interval when the assay is feasible biologically, time for sample preparation and analysis, ease of use, logistical requirements, potential throughput, point-of-care capability, and the ability to support patient diagnosis and treatment within a therapeutically relevant time point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24162058      PMCID: PMC3810609          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31829cf221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  95 in total

1.  Cytogenetic biodosimetry of an accidental exposure of a radiological worker using multiple assays.

Authors:  H Thierens; K De Ruyck; A Vral; V de Gelder; C A Whitehouse; E J Tawn; I Boesman
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Estimating radiation dose from time to emesis and lymphocyte depletion.

Authors:  Denise D Parker; Jack C Parker
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Early dose assessment following severe radiation accidents.

Authors:  R E Goans; E C Holloway; M E Berger; R C Ricks
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Medical management of radiological casualties.

Authors:  Ronald E Goans; Jamie K Waselenko
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  MicroRNA responses to cellular stress.

Authors:  Carmen J Marsit; Karen Eddy; Karl T Kelsey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Radiation-induced response of micro RNA expression in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Hideshi Ishii; Toshiyuki Saito
Journal:  Med Chem       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 7.  Collective radiation biodosimetry for dose reconstruction of acute accidental exposures: a review.

Authors:  B Pass
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Development of in vivo tooth EPR for individual radiation dose estimation and screening.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Maciej Kmiec; Greg Burke; Eugene Demidenko; David Gladstone; Roberto J Nicolalde; Artur Sucheta; Piotr Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Radiation metabolomics. 5. Identification of urinary biomarkers of ionizing radiation exposure in nonhuman primates by mass spectrometry-based metabolomics.

Authors:  Caroline H Johnson; Andrew D Patterson; Kristopher W Krausz; John F Kalinich; John B Tyburski; Dong Wook Kang; Hans Luecke; Frank J Gonzalez; William F Blakely; Jeffrey R Idle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  An optimized method for detecting gamma-H2AX in blood cells reveals a significant interindividual variation in the gamma-H2AX response among humans.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Tabasum Imran Wadhra; Ola Hammarsten
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  63 in total

1.  Comparison of Proteomic Biodosimetry Biomarkers Across Five Different Murine Strains.

Authors:  Mary Sproull; Uma Shankavaram; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  The Radiation Stress Response: Of the People, By the People and For the People.

Authors:  C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Serum microRNAs are early indicators of survival after radiation-induced hematopoietic injury.

Authors:  Sanket S Acharya; Wojciech Fendler; Jacqueline Watson; Abigail Hamilton; Yunfeng Pan; Emily Gaudiano; Patryk Moskwa; Payel Bhanja; Subhrajit Saha; Chandan Guha; Kalindi Parmar; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury.

Authors:  Carmen I Rios; David R Cassatt; Brynn A Hollingsworth; Merriline M Satyamitra; Yeabsera S Tadesse; Lanyn P Taliaferro; Thomas A Winters; Andrea L DiCarlo
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  Metabolomic applications in radiation biodosimetry: exploring radiation effects through small molecules.

Authors:  Evan L Pannkuk; Albert J Fornace; Evagelia C Laiakis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Automated analysis of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay for radiation biodosimetry using imaging flow cytometry.

Authors:  M A Rodrigues; L A Beaton-Green; B C Kutzner; R C Wilkins
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Advances in in vivo EPR Tooth BIOdosimetry: Meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Benjamin B Williams; Wilson Schreiber; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Wood; Maciej M Kmiec; Sergey V Petryakov; Eugene Demidenko; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Development of a novel mouth model as an alternative tool to test the effectiveness of an in vivo EPR dosimetry system.

Authors:  Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Roberto Javier Nicolalde; Paul Calderon; Gaixin Du; Benjamin B Williams; Masaichi-Chang-Il Lee; Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Radioprotectors and Radiomitigators for Improving Radiation Therapy: The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Gateway for Accelerating Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Pataje G S Prasanna; Deepa Narayanan; Kory Hallett; Eric J Bernhard; Mansoor M Ahmed; Gregory Evans; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael Weingarten; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.