Literature DB >> 23129299

Pathway hunting by random survival forests.

Xi Chen1, Hemant Ishwaran.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Pathway or gene set analysis has been widely applied to genomic data. Many current pathway testing methods use univariate test statistics calculated from individual genomic markers, which ignores the correlations and interactions between candidate markers. Random forests-based pathway analysis is a promising approach for incorporating complex correlation and interaction patterns, but one limitation of previous approaches is that pathways have been considered separately, thus pathway cross-talk information was not considered.
RESULTS: In this article, we develop a new pathway hunting algorithm for survival outcomes using random survival forests, which prioritize important pathways by accounting for gene correlation and genomic interactions. We show that the proposed method performs favourably compared with five popular pathway testing methods using both synthetic and real data. We find that the proposed methodology provides an efficient and powerful pathway modelling framework for high-dimensional genomic data. AVAILABILITY: The R code for the analysis used in this article is available upon request.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129299      PMCID: PMC3530909          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  41 in total

1.  Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues.

Authors:  Jelle J Goeman; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Pathway analysis using random forests with bivariate node-split for survival outcomes.

Authors:  Herbert Pang; Debayan Datta; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  The tumour microenvironment as a target for chemoprevention.

Authors:  Adriana Albini; Michael B Sporn
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Leptin regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, tumor necrosis factor, and uncoupling protein-2 expression in adipose tissues.

Authors:  H Qian; G J Hausman; M M Compton; M J Azain; D L Hartzell; C A Baile
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Cancer inhibition by inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) and inositol: from laboratory to clinic.

Authors:  Ivana Vucenik; AbulKalam M Shamsuddin
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 8.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma pathway targeting in carcinogenesis: implications for chemoprevention.

Authors:  Frank Ondrey
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Screening large-scale association study data: exploiting interactions using random forests.

Authors:  Kathryn L Lunetta; L Brooke Hayward; Jonathan Segal; Paul Van Eerdewegh
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  PAGE: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment.

Authors:  Seon-Young Kim; David J Volsky
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  17 in total

1.  A Clinical Decision Tree to Predict Whether a Bacteremic Patient Is Infected With an Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Organism.

Authors:  Katherine E Goodman; Justin Lessler; Sara E Cosgrove; Anthony D Harris; Ebbing Lautenbach; Jennifer H Han; Aaron M Milstone; Colin J Massey; Pranita D Tamma
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  L₁ splitting rules in survival forests.

Authors:  Hoora Moradian; Denis Larocque; François Bellavance
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  A Selective Review on Random Survival Forests for High Dimensional Data.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Gang Li
Journal:  Quant Biosci       Date:  2017

4.  Random survival forests identify pathways with polymorphisms predictive of survival in KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Madiha Naseem; Shu Cao; Dongyun Yang; Joshua Millstein; Alberto Puccini; Fotios Loupakis; Sebastian Stintzing; Chiara Cremolini; Ryuma Tokunaga; Francesca Battaglin; Shivani Soni; Martin D Berger; Afsaneh Barzi; Wu Zhang; Alfredo Falcone; Volker Heinemann; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Statistical and Computational Methods for Genetic Diseases: An Overview.

Authors:  Francesco Camastra; Maria Donata Di Taranto; Antonino Staiano
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Letter to the Editor: On the term 'interaction' and related phrases in the literature on Random Forests.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Silke Janitza; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Kristel Van Steen; Carolin Strobl
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  ColoFinder: a prognostic 9-gene signature improves prognosis for 871 stage II and III colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Mingguang Shi; Jianmin He
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Mining gene link information for survival pathway hunting.

Authors:  Gao-Jian Jing; Zirui Zhang; Hong-Qiang Wang; Hong-Mei Zheng
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.615

9.  A review for detecting gene-gene interactions using machine learning methods in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  Ching Lee Koo; Mei Jing Liew; Mohd Saberi Mohamad; Abdul Hakim Mohamed Salleh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Hemoglobin level, a prognostic factor for nasal extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma patients from stage I to IV: A validated prognostic nomogram.

Authors:  Jianzhong Cao; Shengmin Lan; Liuhai Shen; Hongwei Si; Huan Xiao; Qiang Yuan; Xue Li; Hongwei Li; Ruyuan Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.