Literature DB >> 27342400

Estrogen Receptor Binding (18F-FES PET) and Glycolytic Activity (18F-FDG PET) Predict Progression-Free Survival on Endocrine Therapy in Patients with ER+ Breast Cancer.

Brenda F Kurland1, Lanell M Peterson2, Jean H Lee2, Erin K Schubert3, Erin R Currin4, Jeanne M Link5, Kenneth A Krohn2, David A Mankoff3, Hannah M Linden4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: 18F-fluoroestradiol (FES) PET scans measure regional estrogen binding, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET measures tumor glycolytic activity. We examined quantitative and qualitative imaging biomarkers of progression-free survival (PFS) in breast cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Ninety patients with breast cancer from an estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2- primary tumor underwent FES PET and FDG PET scans prior to endocrine therapy (63% aromatase inhibitor, 22% aromatase inhibitor and fulvestrant, 15% other). Eighty-four had evaluable data for PFS prediction.
RESULTS: Recursive partitioning with 5-fold internal cross-validation used both FES PET and FDG PET measures to classify patients into three distinct response groups. FDG PET identified 24 patients (29%) with low FDG uptake, suggesting indolent tumors. These patients had a median PFS of 26.1 months (95% confidence interval, 11.2-49.7). Of patients with more FDG-avid tumors, 50 (59%) had high average FES uptake, and 10 (12%) had low average FES uptake. These groups had median PFS of 7.9 (5.6-11.8) and 3.3 months (1.4-not evaluable), respectively. Patient and tumor features did not replace or improve the PET measures' prediction of PFS. Prespecified endocrine resistance classifiers identified in smaller cohorts did not individually predict PFS.
CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of therapy regimens are available for treatment of ER+ metastatic breast cancer, but no guidelines are established for sequencing these therapies. FDG PET and FES PET may help guide the timing of endocrine therapy and selection of targeted and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy. A multicenter trial is ongoing for external validation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 407-15. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27342400      PMCID: PMC5183531          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  31 in total

1.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  PET imaging of estrogen receptors as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer patients presenting with a clinical dilemma.

Authors:  Michel van Kruchten; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Erik F J de Vries; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Carolien P Schröder; Rudi A Dierckx; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Geke A P Hospers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Should clearance be normalised to body surface or to lean body mass?

Authors:  T H Hallynck; H H Soep; J A Thomis; J Boelaert; R Daneels; L Dettli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Pharmacodynamic imaging guides dosing of a selective estrogen receptor degrader.

Authors:  Pedram Heidari; Francis Deng; Shadi A Esfahani; Alicia K Leece; Timothy M Shoup; Neil Vasdev; Umar Mahmood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Quantitative imaging of estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer with PET and 18F-fluoroestradiol.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; David A Mankoff; Thomas Lawton; Kevin Yagle; Erin K Schubert; Svetlana Stekhova; Allen Gown; Jeanne M Link; Timothy Tewson; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Analysis of ESR1 mutation in circulating tumor DNA demonstrates evolution during therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Gaia Schiavon; Sarah Hrebien; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Rosalind J Cutts; Alex Pearson; Noelia Tarazona; Kerry Fenwick; Iwanka Kozarewa; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Ricardo Ribas; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Peter Osin; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Lesley-Ann Martin; Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution.

Authors:  K Hamacher; H H Coenen; G Stöcklin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Sensitive Detection of Mono- and Polyclonal ESR1 Mutations in Primary Tumors, Metastatic Lesions, and Cell-Free DNA of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Peilu Wang; Amir Bahreini; Rekha Gyanchandani; Peter C Lucas; Ryan J Hartmaier; Rebecca J Watters; Amruth R Jonnalagadda; Humberto E Trejo Bittar; Aaron Berg; Ronald L Hamilton; Brenda F Kurland; Kurt R Weiss; Aju Mathew; Jose Pablo Leone; Nancy E Davidson; Marina N Nikiforova; Adam M Brufsky; Tadeu F Ambros; Andrew M Stern; Shannon L Puhalla; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Feasibility and predictability of perioperative PET and estrogen receptor ligand in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary L Gemignani; Sujata Patil; Venkatraman E Seshan; Michelle Sampson; John L Humm; Jason S Lewis; Edi Brogi; Steven M Larson; Monica Morrow; Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  34 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in Metastatic Breast Cancer 18F-Fluoroestradiol Uptake: Clinically Actionable, Biologically Illuminating?

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Steffi Oesterreich
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Imaging: Follow your PET for guidance.

Authors:  Diana Romero
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Head-to-Head Evaluation of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Vaios Hatzoglou; Christopher C Riedl; Jason S Lewis; Audrey Mauguen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Receptor Occupancy Imaging Studies in Oncology Drug Development.

Authors:  Ingrid J G Burvenich; Sagun Parakh; Adam C Parslow; Sze Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT Measurement of Estrogen Receptor Suppression during a Phase I Trial of the Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Therapeutic GDC-0810: Using an Imaging Biomarker to Guide Drug Dosage in Subsequent Trials.

Authors:  Yingbing Wang; Karen L Ayres; Debra A Goldman; Maura N Dickler; Aditya Bardia; Ingrid A Mayer; Eric Winer; Jill Fredrickson; Carlos L Arteaga; José Baselga; Henry C Manning; Umar Mahmood; Gary A Ulaner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Miladinova
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-16

7.  18F-FES PET/CT Influences the Staging and Management of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Chengcheng Gong; Shuai Liu; Yingjian Zhang; Yongping Zhang; Xiaoping Xu; Huiyu Yuan; Biyun Wang; Zhongyi Yang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-07-23

Review 8.  Imaging Tumor Proliferation in Breast Cancer: Current Update on Predictive Imaging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Azadeh Elmi; Elizabeth S McDonald; David Mankoff
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

Review 9.  Clinical Potential of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Lanell M Peterson; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

Review 10.  The Spatial and Genomic Hierarchy of Tumor Ecosystems Revealed by Single-Cell Technologies.

Authors:  Eric A Smith; H Courtney Hodges
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2019-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.