Literature DB >> 31337657

18F-FES PET/CT Influences the Staging and Management of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Cheng Liu1,2,3,4,5, Chengcheng Gong6,2, Shuai Liu1,2,3,4,5, Yingjian Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Yongping Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Xiaoping Xu1,2,3,4,5, Huiyu Yuan1,2,3,4,5, Biyun Wang7,2, Zhongyi Yang8,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the clinical value of 16a-18F-fluoro-17b-estradiol (18F-FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT and investigated whether and how 18F-FES PET/CT affects the implemented management of newly diagnosed estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 19 female patients newly diagnosed with immunohistochemistry-confirmed estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer who underwent 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT within 1 week in our center. The sensitivity of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG in diagnosed lesions were compared. To investigate the definite clinical impact of 18F-FES on managing patients with newly diagnosed ER positive breast cancer, we designed two kinds of questionnaires. Referring physicians completed the first questionnaire based on the 18F-FDG report to propose the treatment regime, and the second was completed immediately after reviewing the imaging report of 18F-FES to indicate intended management changes.
RESULTS: In total, 238 lesions were analyzed in 19 patients with newly diagnosed ER-positive breast cancer. Lesion detection was achieved in 216 sites with 18F-FES PET and in 197 sites with 18F-FDG PET/CT. These results corresponded to sensitivities of 90.8% for 18F-FES versus 82.8% for 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosed lesions. Thirty-five physicians were given the questionnaires referring to the treatment strategy, with 27 of them completing both questionnaires. The application of 18F-FES in addition to 18F-FDG PET/CT changed the management in 26.3% of the 19 patients with newly diagnosed ER-positive breast cancer.
CONCLUSION: Performing 18F-FES PET/CT in newly diagnosed ER-positive breast cancer patients increases the value of diagnosis equivocal lesions and treatment management compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study investigated whether 16a-18F-fluoro-17b-estradiol (18F-FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) affects the clinical management of patients with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Physicians completing two questionnaires comparing the clinical impact of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG on individual management plans in patients with newly diagnosed ER-positive breast cancer confirmed that 18F-FES scans led to change in management in 26.3% of the 19 patients with newly diagnosed ER positive breast cancer. This retrospective study indicates the potential impact of 18F-FES PET/CT on intended management of patients with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor positive breast cancer in comparison to 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm32199018F‐FDG; zzm32199018F‐FES; Management changes; Newly diagnosed breast cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31337657      PMCID: PMC6975963          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  32 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Measuring residual estrogen receptor availability during fulvestrant therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Michel van Kruchten; Elisabeth G de Vries; Andor W Glaudemans; Meta C van Lanschot; Martijn van Faassen; Ido P Kema; Myles Brown; Carolien P Schröder; Erik F de Vries; Geke A Hospers
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  The Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Status and Its Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Patients With Breast Cancer by Using 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT.

Authors:  Zhongyi Yang; Yifei Sun; Xiaoping Xu; Yongping Zhang; Jianping Zhang; Jing Xue; Mingwei Wang; Huiyu Yuan; Silong Hu; Wei Shi; Beiling Zhu; Yingjian Zhang
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 4.  Global Cancer in Women: Burden and Trends.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Farhad Islami; Rebecca L Siegel; Elizabeth M Ward; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  PET imaging of steroid receptor expression in breast and prostate cancer.

Authors:  G A P Hospers; F A Helmond; E G E de Vries; R A Dierckx; E F J de Vries
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Quantitative imaging of estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer with PET and 18F-fluoroestradiol.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; David A Mankoff; Thomas Lawton; Kevin Yagle; Erin K Schubert; Svetlana Stekhova; Allen Gown; Jeanne M Link; Timothy Tewson; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Cancer statistics in China, 2015.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Peter D Baade; Siwei Zhang; Hongmei Zeng; Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Xue Qin Yu; Jie He
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline.

Authors:  Hope S Rugo; R Bryan Rumble; Erin Macrae; Debra L Barton; Hannah Klein Connolly; Maura N Dickler; Lesley Fallowfield; Barbara Fowble; James N Ingle; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Stephen R D Johnston; Larissa A Korde; James L Khatcheressian; Rita S Mehta; Hyman B Muss; Harold J Burstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Feasibility and predictability of perioperative PET and estrogen receptor ligand in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary L Gemignani; Sujata Patil; Venkatraman E Seshan; Michelle Sampson; John L Humm; Jason S Lewis; Edi Brogi; Steven M Larson; Monica Morrow; Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Prognostic Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System in 24,014 Korean Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Isaac Kim; Hee Jun Choi; Jai Min Ryu; Se Kyung Lee; Jong Han Yu; Seok Won Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.588

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dual Tracers of 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-Estradiol and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose for Prediction of Progression-Free Survival After Fulvestrant Therapy in Patients With HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Xiaoping Xu; Huiyu Yuan; Yongping Zhang; Yingjian Zhang; Shaoli Song; Zhongyi Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Relationship between the expression of oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and 18F-FDG uptake in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Chunhua Wu; Ruohua Chen; Lian Xu; Yumei Chen; Yining Wang; Gan Huang; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Is 18F-FDG PET/CT Beneficial for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients With Low Proportion of ER Expression?

Authors:  Jiachen Liu; Runlu Sun; Yuping Yin; Jingyan Li; Xuming Liu; Sheng Liu; Zhanlei Zhang; Jieting Hu; Xiaoting Wan; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michele Balma; Virginia Liberini; Manuela Racca; Riccardo Laudicella; Matteo Bauckneht; Ambra Buschiazzo; Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti; Simona Peano; Andrea Bianchi; Giovanni Albano; Natale Quartuccio; Ronan Abgral; Silvia Daniela Morbelli; Calogero D'Alessandria; Enzo Terreno; Martin William Huellner; Alberto Papaleo; Désirée Deandreis
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 5.  Head-to-Head Comparison between 18F-FES PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Arnoldo Piccardo; Francesco Fiz; Giorgio Treglia; Gianluca Bottoni; Pierpaolo Trimboli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Evaluation of tumour heterogeneity by 18F-fluoroestradiol PET as a predictive measure in breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Shihui Hu; Xiaoping Xu; Yongping Zhang; Biyun Wang; Shaoli Song; Zhongyi Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 8.408

Review 7.  Molecular Imaging, How Close to Clinical Precision Medicine in Lung, Brain, Prostate and Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Zhaoguo Han; Mingxing Ke; Xiang Liu; Jing Wang; Zhengqi Guan; Lina Qiao; Zhexi Wu; Yingying Sun; Xilin Sun
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Whole-Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta-Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Jay R Wiggins; Amandine Coche; Charlotte Fontan; Yann Bouvet; Peter Webner; Chaitanya Divgi; Hannah M Linden
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.837

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.