Literature DB >> 26560360

Analysis of ESR1 mutation in circulating tumor DNA demonstrates evolution during therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Gaia Schiavon1, Sarah Hrebien2, Isaac Garcia-Murillas2, Rosalind J Cutts2, Alex Pearson2, Noelia Tarazona2, Kerry Fenwick2, Iwanka Kozarewa2, Elena Lopez-Knowles2, Ricardo Ribas2, Ashutosh Nerurkar3, Peter Osin3, Sarat Chandarlapaty4, Lesley-Ann Martin2, Mitch Dowsett1, Ian E Smith1, Nicholas C Turner5.   

Abstract

Acquired ESR1 mutations are a major mechanism of resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs). We developed ultra high-sensitivity multiplex digital polymerase chain reaction assays for ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and investigated the clinical relevance and origin of ESR1 mutations in 171 women with advanced breast cancer. ESR1 mutation status in ctDNA showed high concordance with contemporaneous tumor biopsies and was accurately assessed in samples shipped at room temperature in preservative tubes. ESR1 mutations were found exclusively in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients previously exposed to AI. Patients with ESR1 mutations had a substantially shorter progression-free survival on subsequent AI-based therapy [hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9 to 23.1; P = 0.0041]. ESR1 mutation prevalence differed markedly between patients who were first exposed to AI during the adjuvant and metastatic settings [5.8% (3 of 52) versus 36.4% (16 of 44), respectively; P = 0.0002]. In an independent cohort, ESR1 mutations were identified in 0% (0 of 32; 95% CI, 0 to 10.9) tumor biopsies taken after progression on adjuvant AI. In a patient with serial sampling, ESR1 mutation was selected during metastatic AI therapy to become the dominant clone in the cancer. ESR1 mutations can be robustly identified with ctDNA analysis and predict for resistance to subsequent AI therapy. ESR1 mutations are rarely acquired during adjuvant AI but are commonly selected by therapy for metastatic disease, providing evidence that mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapy may be substantially different between the treatment of micrometastatic and overt metastatic cancer.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26560360      PMCID: PMC4998737          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac7551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  21 in total

1.  Short report: Monitoring ESR1 mutations by circulating tumor DNA in aromatase inhibitor resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  David Sefrioui; Anne Perdrix; Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur; Claire Dolfus; Antoine Dujon; Jean-Michel Picquenot; Julien Delacour; Marie Cornic; Elodie Bohers; Marianne Leheurteur; Olivier Rigal; Isabelle Tennevet; Jean-Christophe Thery; Cristina Alexandru; Cécile Guillemet; Cristian Moldovan; Corinne Veyret; Thierry Frebourg; Frédéric Di Fiore; Florian Clatot
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Campbell; Shinichi Yachida; Laura J Mudie; Philip J Stephens; Erin D Pleasance; Lucy A Stebbings; Laura A Morsberger; Calli Latimer; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena A Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; Constance A Griffin; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Michael A Quail; Michael R Stratton; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  HER2 discordance between primary breast cancer and its paired metastasis: tumor biology or test artefact? Insights through meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; Rosemary L Balleine; Michael Bilous; Mark D Pegram
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Preexistence and clonal selection of MET amplification in EGFR mutant NSCLC.

Authors:  Alexa B Turke; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Yi-Long Wu; Youngchul Song; Dora Dias-Santagata; Eugene Lifshits; Luca Toschi; Andrew Rogers; Tony Mok; Lecia Sequist; Neal I Lindeman; Carly Murphy; Sara Akhavanfard; Beow Y Yeap; Yun Xiao; Marzia Capelletti; A John Iafrate; Charles Lee; James G Christensen; Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft.

Authors:  Li Ding; Matthew J Ellis; Shunqiang Li; David E Larson; Ken Chen; John W Wallis; Christopher C Harris; Michael D McLellan; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; Rachel M Abbott; Jeremy Hoog; David J Dooling; Daniel C Koboldt; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki; Qunyuan Zhang; Lei Chen; Ling Lin; Michael C Wendl; Joshua F McMichael; Vincent J Magrini; Lisa Cook; Sean D McGrath; Tammi L Vickery; Elizabeth Appelbaum; Katherine Deschryver; Sherri Davies; Therese Guintoli; Li Lin; Robert Crowder; Yu Tao; Jacqueline E Snider; Scott M Smith; Adam F Dukes; Gabriel E Sanderson; Craig S Pohl; Kim D Delehaunty; Catrina C Fronick; Kimberley A Pape; Jerry S Reed; Jody S Robinson; Jennifer S Hodges; William Schierding; Nathan D Dees; Dong Shen; Devin P Locke; Madeline E Wiechert; James M Eldred; Josh B Peck; Benjamin J Oberkfell; Justin T Lolofie; Feiyu Du; Amy E Hawkins; Michelle D O'Laughlin; Kelly E Bernard; Mark Cunningham; Glendoria Elliott; Mark D Mason; Dominic M Thompson; Jennifer L Ivanovich; Paul J Goodfellow; Charles M Perou; George M Weinstock; Rebecca Aft; Mark Watson; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Noninvasive detection of activating estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  David S Guttery; Karen Page; Allison Hills; Laura Woodley; Stephanie D Marchese; Basma Rghebi; Robert K Hastings; Jinli Luo; J Howard Pringle; Justin Stebbing; R Charles Coombes; Simak Ali; Jacqueline A Shaw
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Luis A Diaz; Richard T Williams; Jian Wu; Isaac Kinde; J Randolph Hecht; Jordan Berlin; Benjamin Allen; Ivana Bozic; Johannes G Reiter; Martin A Nowak; Kenneth W Kinzler; Kelly S Oliner; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Relationship of PIK3CA mutation and pathway activity with antiproliferative response to aromatase inhibition.

Authors:  Elena López-Knowles; Corrinne V Segal; Qiong Gao; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Nicholas C Turner; Ian Smith; Lesley-Ann Martin; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Biomarker changes associated with the development of resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  M Arnedos; S Drury; M Afentakis; R A'Hern; M Hills; J Salter; I E Smith; J S Reis-Filho; M Dowsett
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  Weiyi Toy; Yang Shen; Helen Won; Bradley Green; Rita A Sakr; Marie Will; Zhiqiang Li; Kinisha Gala; Sean Fanning; Tari A King; Clifford Hudis; David Chen; Tetiana Taran; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Geoffrey Greene; Michael Berger; José Baselga; Sarat Chandarlapaty
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  205 in total

Review 1.  Circulating cell-free DNA for non-invasive cancer management.

Authors:  Caitlin M Stewart; Dana W Y Tsui
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2018-03-11

Review 2.  Emerging Role of Genomics and Cell-Free DNA in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Gerratana; Andrew A Davis; Ami N Shah; Chenyu Lin; Carla Corvaja; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-06-29

Review 3.  Applications of liquid biopsy in the Pharmacological Audit Trail for anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Abhijit Pal; Rajiv Shinde; Manuel Selvi Miralles; Paul Workman; Johann de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  The state of the art in prediction of breast cancer relapse using cell-free circulating tumor DNA liquid biopsies.

Authors:  Niklas Loman; Lao H Saal
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

5.  Surveillance After Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer: Time for Reappraisal?

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; N Lynn Henry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Characterizing the Cancer Genome in Blood.

Authors:  Sarah-Jane Dawson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  Detection of Solid Tumor Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Using Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA).

Authors:  Re-I Chin; Kevin Chen; Abul Usmani; Chanelle Chua; Peter K Harris; Michael S Binkley; Tej D Azad; Jonathan C Dudley; Aadel A Chaudhuri
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 8.  The current state of molecular testing in the treatment of patients with solid tumors, 2019.

Authors:  Wafik S El-Deiry; Richard M Goldberg; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Anthony F Shields; Geoffrey T Gibney; Antoinette R Tan; Jubilee Brown; Burton Eisenberg; Elisabeth I Heath; Surasak Phuphanich; Edward Kim; Andrew J Brenner; John L Marshall
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Structurally Novel Antiestrogens Elicit Differential Responses from Constitutively Active Mutant Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer Cells and Tumors.

Authors:  Yuechao Zhao; Mary J Laws; Valeria Sanabria Guillen; Yvonne Ziegler; Jian Min; Abhishek Sharma; Sung Hoon Kim; David Chu; Ben Ho Park; Steffi Oesterreich; Chengjian Mao; David J Shapiro; Kendall W Nettles; John A Katzenellenbogen; Benita S Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Estrogen Receptor Binding (18F-FES PET) and Glycolytic Activity (18F-FDG PET) Predict Progression-Free Survival on Endocrine Therapy in Patients with ER+ Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Jean H Lee; Erin K Schubert; Erin R Currin; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff; Hannah M Linden
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.