Literature DB >> 31723360

Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer.

Daniela Miladinova1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among females with more than 2 million new cases diagnosed worldwide in 2018. Although the prognosis in the majority of cases in the early stages combined with appropriate treatment is positive, there are still about 30% of patients who will develop locoregional diseases and distant metastases. Molecular imaging is very important in the diagnosis, staging, follow-up, and radiotherapy planning. Additionally, it is useful in characterizing lesions, prognosis, and therapy response in BC patients. Nuclear medicine imaging modalities (SPECT and PET) are of indispensable importance in diagnosis (positron emission mammography), staging (sentinel lymph node detection), and follow-up with18F-FDG and tumor characterization. Among many available PET tracers, the most commonly used are 18F-FLT, 18F-FES, 18F-FDHT, 64Cu DOTA trastuzumab (bevacizumab), 68Ga-PSMA, 68Ga-RM2 (gastrin-releasing peptide receptor), 18F-fluorooctreotide (SSTR), and 68Ga-TRAP (RGD)-3αvβ3-integrin. Molecular imaging helps in evaluation of tumor heterogeneity, allowing a shift from one-size-fits-all-approach to era of personalized medicine and precision oncology. © Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Molecular imaging; Personalized medicine; Positron emission tomography; Precision oncology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31723360      PMCID: PMC6821902          DOI: 10.1007/s13139-019-00614-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1869-3474


  20 in total

1.  64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab PET imaging in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Tamura; Hiroaki Kurihara; Kan Yonemori; Hitoshi Tsuda; Junko Suzuki; Yuzuru Kono; Natsuki Honda; Makoto Kodaira; Harukaze Yamamoto; Mayu Yunokawa; Chikako Shimizu; Koki Hasegawa; Yousuke Kanayama; Satoshi Nozaki; Takayuki Kinoshita; Yasuhiro Wada; Shusaku Tazawa; Kazuhiro Takahashi; Yasuyoshi Watanabe; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA imaging of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Mike Sathekge; Moshe Modiselle; Mariza Vorster; Neo Mokgoro; Nozipho Nyakale; Brenda Mokaleng; Thomas Ebenhan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  SPECT/CT Imaging of the Novel HER2-Targeted Peptide Probe 99mTc-HYNIC-H6F in Breast Cancer Mouse Models.

Authors:  Liqiang Li; Yue Wu; Zihua Wang; Bing Jia; Zhiyuan Hu; Chengyan Dong; Fan Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients as a Surrogate for Tissue Biopsies.

Authors:  Clasina M Venema; Lemonitsa H Mammatas; Carolina P Schröder; Michel van Kruchten; Giulia Apollonio; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Alfons H H Bongaerts; Otto S Hoekstra; Henk M W Verheul; Epi Boven; Bert van der Vegt; Erik F J de Vries; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Ronald Boellaard; Catharina W Menke van der Houven van Oordt; Geke A P Hospers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Estrogen Receptor Binding (18F-FES PET) and Glycolytic Activity (18F-FDG PET) Predict Progression-Free Survival on Endocrine Therapy in Patients with ER+ Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Jean H Lee; Erin K Schubert; Erin R Currin; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff; Hannah M Linden
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  A Randomized Feasibility Study of 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET to Predict Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Estrogen Receptor-Rich Postmenopausal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sun Young Chae; Sung-Bae Kim; Sei Hyun Ahn; Hye Ok Kim; Dok Hyun Yoon; Jin-Hee Ahn; Kyung Hae Jung; Sangwon Han; Seung Jun Oh; Sang Ju Lee; Hee Jeong Kim; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong; Hyo Sang Lee; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in a Patient Affected by Metastatic Breast Cancer with Neuroendocrine Differentiation.

Authors:  Giordano Savelli; Alberto Zaniboni; Francesco Bertagna; Giovanni Bosio; Lutfun Nisa; Carlo Rodella; Giorgio Biasiotto; Giovanni Bettinsoli; Elena Migliorati; Alessia Peli; Roberta Falchi; Francesca Giuffrida; Raffaele Giubbini
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  68Ga-TRAP-(RGD)3 Hybrid Imaging for the In Vivo Monitoring of αvß3-Integrin Expression as Biomarker of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy Effects in Experimental Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Philipp M Kazmierczak; Andrei Todica; Franz-Josef Gildehaus; Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder; Matthias Brendel; Ralf S Eschbach; Magdalena Hellmann; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Saskia Kropf; Axel Rominger; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development of 99mTc-radiolabeled nanosilica for targeted detection of HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Rainone; Benedetta Riva; Sara Belloli; Francesco Sudati; Marilena Ripamonti; Paolo Verderio; Miriam Colombo; Barbara Colzani; Maria Carla Gilardi; Rosa Maria Moresco; Davide Prosperi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-05-02

10.  68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET imaging in breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Mike Sathekge; Thabo Lengana; Moshe Modiselle; Mariza Vorster; JanRijn Zeevaart; Alex Maes; Thomas Ebenhan; Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the Accuracy of FUCCI Cell Cycle In Vivo Fluorescent Imaging to Assess Tumor Proliferation in Preclinical Oncology Models.

Authors:  Yun Lu; Adriana V F Massicano; Carlos A Gallegos; Katherine A Heinzman; Sean W Parish; Jason M Warram; Anna G Sorace
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Imaging for Response Assessment in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Asser A Elkassem; Samuel J Galgano; Suzanne E Lapi; Benjamin M Larimer; Savannah C Partridge; C Chad Quarles; Kirsten Reeves; Tiara S Napier; Patrick N Song; Thomas E Yankeelov; Stefanie Woodard; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Comparison of diagnostic sensitivity of [18F]fluoroestradiol and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for breast cancer recurrence in patients with a history of estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Sun Young Chae; Hye Joo Son; Dong Yun Lee; Eonwoo Shin; Jungsu S Oh; Seung Yeon Seo; Sora Baek; Ji Young Kim; Sae Jung Na; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  MiRNA-186-5p Exerts an Anticancer Role in Breast Cancer by Downregulating CXCL13.

Authors:  Yulong Wang; Shaojun Hu; Hongbin Zhang; Chenxin Zhang; Qixin Lian; Yu Jiao; Yu Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Is there utility for fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scan before surgery in breast cancer? A 15-year overall survival analysis.

Authors:  Justine Perrin; Karim Farid; Hilde Van Parijs; Olena Gorobets; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Nam P Nguyen; Navid Djassemi; Mark De Ridder; Hendrik Everaert
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-24

Review 6.  Diabetes, Obesity, and Inflammation: Impact on Clinical and Radiographic Features of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Braden Miller; Hunter Chalfant; Alexandra Thomas; Elizabeth Wellberg; Christina Henson; Molly W McNally; William E Grizzle; Ajay Jain; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.