Literature DB >> 28011460

18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT Measurement of Estrogen Receptor Suppression during a Phase I Trial of the Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Therapeutic GDC-0810: Using an Imaging Biomarker to Guide Drug Dosage in Subsequent Trials.

Yingbing Wang1, Karen L Ayres2, Debra A Goldman3, Maura N Dickler4, Aditya Bardia5, Ingrid A Mayer6, Eric Winer7, Jill Fredrickson8, Carlos L Arteaga6, José Baselga4, Henry C Manning2, Umar Mahmood1, Gary A Ulaner9.   

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate 18F-fluoroestradiol (FES) PET/CT as a biomarker of estrogen receptor (ER) occupancy and/or downregulation during phase I dose escalation of the novel ER targeting therapeutic GDC-0810 and help select drug dosage for subsequent clinical trials.Experimental Design: In a phase I clinical trial of GDC-0810, patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer underwent FES PET/CT before beginning therapy and at cycle 2, day 3 of GDC-0810 therapy. Up to five target lesions were selected per patient, and FES standardized uptake value (SUV) corrected for background was recorded for each lesion pretherapy and on-therapy. Complete ER downregulation was defined as ≥90% decrease in FES SUV. The effect of prior tamoxifen and fulvestrant therapy on FES SUV was assessed.
Results: Of 30 patients who underwent paired FES-PET scans, 24 (80%) achieved ≥90% decrease in FES avidity, including 1 of 3 patients receiving 200 mg/day, 2 of 4 patients receiving 400 mg/day, 14 of 16 patients receiving 600 mg/day, and 7 of 7 patients receiving 800 mg/day. Withdrawal of tamoxifen 2 months prior to FES PET/CT and withdrawal of fulvestrant 6 months prior to FES PET/CT both appeared sufficient to prevent effects on FES SUV. A dosage of 600 mg GDC-0810 per day was selected for phase II in part due to decreases in FES SUV achieved in phase I.Conclusions: FES PET/CT was a useful biomarker of ER occupancy and/or downregulation in a phase I dose escalation trial of GDC-0810 and helped select the dosage of the ER antagonist/degrader for phase II trials. Clin Cancer Res; 23(12); 3053-60. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011460      PMCID: PMC5474190          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  24 in total

1.  Fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography reveals differences in pharmacodynamics of aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Julie R Gralow; Jennifer M Specht; Georgiana K Ellis; Thomas J Lawton; Robert B Livingston; Philip H Petra; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Svetlana A Stekhova; Jeanne M Link; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Georgiana K Ellis; Philip H Petra; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Lisa K Dunnwald; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The selective estrogen receptor downregulator GDC-0810 is efficacious in diverse models of ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  James D Joseph; Beatrice Darimont; Wei Zhou; Alfonso Arrazate; Amy Young; Ellen Ingalla; Kimberly Walter; Robert A Blake; Jim Nonomiya; Zhengyu Guan; Lorna Kategaya; Steven P Govek; Andiliy G Lai; Mehmet Kahraman; Dan Brigham; John Sensintaffar; Nhin Lu; Gang Shao; Jing Qian; Kate Grillot; Michael Moon; Rene Prudente; Eric Bischoff; Kyoung-Jin Lee; Celine Bonnefous; Karensa L Douglas; Jackaline D Julien; Johnny Y Nagasawa; Anna Aparicio; Josh Kaufman; Benjamin Haley; Jennifer M Giltnane; Ingrid E Wertz; Mark R Lackner; Michelle A Nannini; Deepak Sampath; Luis Schwarz; Henry Charles Manning; Mohammed Noor Tantawy; Carlos L Arteaga; Richard A Heyman; Peter J Rix; Lori Friedman; Nicholas D Smith; Ciara Metcalfe; Jeffrey H Hager
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Detection of HER2-Positive Metastases in Patients with HER2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer Using 89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; David M Hyman; Dara S Ross; Adriana Corben; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Shari Goldfarb; Heather McArthur; Joseph P Erinjeri; Stephen B Solomon; Hartmuth Kolb; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Jorge A Carrasquillo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Measuring residual estrogen receptor availability during fulvestrant therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Michel van Kruchten; Elisabeth G de Vries; Andor W Glaudemans; Meta C van Lanschot; Martijn van Faassen; Ido P Kema; Myles Brown; Carolien P Schröder; Erik F de Vries; Geke A Hospers
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Pharmacodynamic imaging guides dosing of a selective estrogen receptor degrader.

Authors:  Pedram Heidari; Francis Deng; Shadi A Esfahani; Alicia K Leece; Timothy M Shoup; Neil Vasdev; Umar Mahmood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Quantitative imaging of estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer with PET and 18F-fluoroestradiol.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; David A Mankoff; Thomas Lawton; Kevin Yagle; Erin K Schubert; Svetlana Stekhova; Allen Gown; Jeanne M Link; Timothy Tewson; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Estrogen Receptor Binding (18F-FES PET) and Glycolytic Activity (18F-FDG PET) Predict Progression-Free Survival on Endocrine Therapy in Patients with ER+ Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Jean H Lee; Erin K Schubert; Erin R Currin; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff; Hannah M Linden
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  PET-based estradiol challenge as a predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Farrokh Dehdashti; Joanne E Mortimer; Kathryn Trinkaus; Michael J Naughton; Matthew Ellis; John A Katzenellenbogen; Michael J Welch; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-03-09       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Feasibility and predictability of perioperative PET and estrogen receptor ligand in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary L Gemignani; Sujata Patil; Venkatraman E Seshan; Michelle Sampson; John L Humm; Jason S Lewis; Edi Brogi; Steven M Larson; Monica Morrow; Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  22 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in Metastatic Breast Cancer 18F-Fluoroestradiol Uptake: Clinically Actionable, Biologically Illuminating?

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Steffi Oesterreich
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  GLL398, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), blocks tumor growth in xenograft breast cancer models.

Authors:  Shanchun Guo; Changde Zhang; Madhusoodanan Mottamal; Ahamed Hossain; Jiawang Liu; Guangdi Wang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Head-to-Head Evaluation of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Vaios Hatzoglou; Christopher C Riedl; Jason S Lewis; Audrey Mauguen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Receptor Occupancy Imaging Studies in Oncology Drug Development.

Authors:  Ingrid J G Burvenich; Sagun Parakh; Adam C Parslow; Sze Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Building the Bridge: Molecular Imaging Biomarkers for 21st Century Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Mark A Sellmyer; Iris K Lee; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 6.  Clinical Potential of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Lanell M Peterson; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Imaging Steroid Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Kelley Salem; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Roberta M Strigel; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  The Predictive Value of Early Changes in 18 F-Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography During Fulvestrant 500 mg Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Min He; Cheng Liu; Qin Shi; Yuyun Sun; Yongping Zhang; Xiaoping Xu; Huiyu Yuan; Yingjian Zhang; Yin Liu; Guangyu Liu; Genhong Di; Zhongyi Yang; Zhonghua Wang; Zhiming Shao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-04-28

Review 9.  Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.

Authors:  Yu-Jung Tsai; Chi Liu
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 10.  The quest for improving the management of breast cancer by functional imaging: The discovery and development of 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol (FES), a PET radiotracer for the estrogen receptor, a historical review.

Authors:  John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.