| Literature DB >> 27330562 |
Li Sun1, Tong Liu1, Bettina Müller1, Anna Schnürer1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Materials rich in lignocellulose, such as straw, are abundant, cheap and highly interesting for biogas production. However, the complex structure of lignocellulose is difficult for microbial cellulolytic enzymes to access, limiting degradation. The rate of degradation depends on the activity of members of the microbial community, but the knowledge of this community in the biogas process is rather limited. This study, therefore, investigated the degradation rate of cellulose and straw in batch cultivation test initiated with inoculums from four co-digestion biogas plants (CD) and six wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). The results were correlated to the bacterial community by 454-pyrosequencing targeting 16S rRNA gene and by T-RFLP analysis targeting genes of glycoside hydrolase families 5 (cel5) and 48 (cel48), combined with construction of clone libraries.Entities:
Keywords: Biogas; Cellulose; Community composition; Glycoside hydrolases; Next generation amplicon sequencing; Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP); cel48; cel5
Year: 2016 PMID: 27330562 PMCID: PMC4912747 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0543-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Operating data for the 10 industrial-scale biogas plants investigated in this study
| Digester code | TSa (%) | VSb (%) | HRTc (day) | TMd (°C) | Tot Ne (g L−1 ww) | pH | VFAf (g L−1) | OLRg (vs g L−1 day−1) | TANh (g L−1 ww) | Ammoniai (g L−1 ww) | Major substrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD01 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 45 | 38 | 8.7 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 4.6 | 0.365 | SSMOWj, slaughterhouse waste |
| CD02 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 55 | 38 | 9.1 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 0.408 | Thin stillage |
| CD03 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 30 | 37 | 2.6 | 7.3 | <0.1 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.022 | SSMOW |
| CD04 | 7.1 | 1.3 | 70 | 38 | 6.2 | 7.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 0.218 | Grass, wheat-based stillage |
| WWTP01 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 17 | 38 | 2.5 | 7.3 | <0.1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.036 | Mixed sludge |
| WWTP02 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 23 | 37 | 2.9 | 7.5 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0.063 | Mixed sludge |
| WWTP03 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 18 | 38 | 1.8 | 7.3 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.022 | Mixed sludge |
| WWTP04 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 30 | 37 | 2.9 | 7.5 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.058 | Mixed sludge |
| WWTP05 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 22 | 37 | 2.1 | 7.3 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.027 | Mixed sludge |
| WWTP06 | 2.1 | 5.5 | 26 | 34 | 1.8 | 7.3 | <0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.023 | Mixed sludge |
CD 01–04 co-digestion plants, WWTP 01–06 wastewater treatment plants
aTotal solids
bVolatile solids
cHydraulic retention time
dTemperature
eTotal nitrogen
fVolatile fatty acids
gOrganic loading rate
hTotal ammonium nitrogen
iFree ammonia, calculated according to Hansen et al. [106]
jSource-separated municipal organic waste
Methane potential and time for degradation of straw and cellulose obtained in biochemical methane potential tests using inoculum from different biogas plants co-digesting different substrates (CD) or sludge from wastewater treatment plants (WWTP)
| Inoculum | Cellulose | Straw | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days to reach % of the final potential | Final potential | Days to reach % of the final potential | Final potential | |||||
| 100 % | 80 % | 50 % | 100 % | 80 % | 50 % | |||
| CD01 | 41 | 24 | 18 | 319 ± 24 | 110 | 56 | 28 | 258 ± 47 |
| CD02 | 110 | 71 | 47 | 307 ± 54 | 75 | 62 | 45 | 233 ± 38 |
| CD03 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 347 ± 15 | 60 | 23 | 8 | 316 ± 37 |
| CD04 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 348 ± 24 | 26 | 10 | 8 | 274 ± 17 |
| WWTP01 | 57 | 15 | 7 | 350 ± 7 | 110 | 44 | 19 | 290 ± 9 |
| WWTP02 | 36 | 13 | 7 | 314 ± 34 | 57 | 24 | 14 | 240 ± 38 |
| WWTP03 | 27 | 11 | 6 | 322 ± 7 | 75 | 25 | 13 | 310 ± 76 |
| WWTP04 | 29 | 15 | 8 | 325 ± 8 | 60 | 20 | 11 | 277 ± 11 |
| WWTP05 | 45 | 9 | 6 | 376 ± 8 | 59 | 30 | 10 | 281 ± 32 |
| WWTP06 | 49 | 13 | 8 | 324 ± 13 | 135 | 39 | 18 | 296 ± 8 |
Summary of observed OTUs, Chao1, Shannon and Simpson index in 10 industrial-scale biogas plants
| Sample | Chao 1 | OTUs | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD01 | 58 | 52 | 1.937 | 0.456 |
| CD02 | 94 | 69 | 3.111 | 0.763 |
| CD03 | 147 | 120 | 5.042 | 0.947 |
| CD04 | 109 | 96 | 3.619 | 0.767 |
| WWTP01 | 294 | 227 | 5.851 | 0.956 |
| WWTP02 | 215 | 187 | 4.737 | 0.861 |
| WWTP03 | 304 | 258 | 5.823 | 0.930 |
| WWTP04 | 209 | 135 | 3.088 | 0.609 |
| WWTP05 | 354 | 244 | 5.899 | 0.955 |
| WWTP06 | 280 | 242 | 5.857 | 0.930 |
CD 01-04 co-digestion plants, WWTP 01-06 wastewater treatment plants
Fig. 1Rarefaction analysis of bacterial communities in 10 industrial-scale biogas plants. CD 01–04 co-digestion plants, WWTP 01–06 wastewater treatment plants
Fig. 2Phylogenetic distance between samples as determined by a unweighted and b weighted UniFrac principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) (red co-digestion plants, blue wastewater treatment plants)
Fig. 3Relative abundance of bacterial 16S rRNA gene at phylum level in 10 industrial-scale biogas plants. CD 01–04 co-digestion plants, WWTP 01–06 wastewater treatment plants
Fig. 4T-RFLP profile representing the community of a glycoside hydrolase gene family 5 (cel5) and b glycoside hydrolase gene family 48 (cel48) in 10 industrial-scale biogas plants: CD01–04/c/s and WWTP 01–06/c/s refer to inoculum analysed at the starting point of a batch cultivation and at the end point using cellulose (-c) and straw (-s) as substrate, respectively
Clone sequences of cel5 and cel48 obtained from industrial-scale biogas processes
| Clone | T-RFs (bp) | Most closely related microorganism | Identity (%) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| OTU01 | 56 |
| 84.8 | WP_021681794 |
| OTU02a | 85 |
| 58.0 | WP_015264998 |
| OTU03b | 85 |
| 61.4 | WP_015264998 |
| OTU04c | 106 |
| 66.3 | WP_007808671 |
| OTU05 | 136 |
| 73.7 | AEV98714 |
| OTU06d | 211 |
| 66.3 | WP_036163195 |
| OTU07e | 275 |
| 57.4 | AEE96311 |
| OTU08f | 362 |
| 58.4 | AEE96311 |
| OTU09 | 375 |
| 72.1 | WP_033166154 |
| OTU10 | 396 |
| 100 | WP_015924614 |
|
| ||||
| OTU01 | 68 |
| 57.9 | AGI39871 |
| OTU02 | 68 |
| 50.0 | ADM52292 |
| OTU03 | 177 |
| 97.5 | CCZ84184 |
| OTU04g | 205 |
| 79.0 | ADM52293 |
| OTU05 | 238 |
| 83.2 | WP_049962845 |
| OTU06 | 238 |
| 61.0 | WP_037642616 |
| OTU07h | 247 |
| 71.2 | WP_010681059 |
| OTU08 | 290 |
| 50.5 | WP_010964229 |
| OTU09i | 321 |
| 75.0 | ACT46162 |
| OTU10j | 328 |
| 73.8 | EMS73539 |
| OTU11k | 358 |
| 78.8 | GAE90081 |
aMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGW24153 (identity: 100 %) from laboratory-scale anaerobic reactor
bMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGW24153 (identity: 89.1 %) from laboratory-scale anaerobic reactor
cMost closely related to uncultured bacterium ACV50344 (identity: 73.3 %) from lignocellulose-based sulphate-reducing bioreactor
dMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGO64733 (identity: 75.0 %) from anaerobic digester sludge
eMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AEV59723 (identity: 77.0 %) from laboratory biogas digester treating rice straw
fMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AEV59723 (identity: 76.0 %) from laboratory biogas digester treating rice straw
gMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGO64695 (identity: 99.0 %) from anaerobic digester sludge
hMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGO64692 (identity: 75.2 %) from anaerobic digester sludge
iMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGO64682 (identity: 85.6 %) from anaerobic digester sludge
jMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGO64673 (identity: 99.1 %) from anaerobic digester sludge
kMost closely related to uncultured bacterium AGO64695 (identity: 99.0 %) from anaerobic digester sludge
Fig. 5Phylogenetic tree of sequences from glycoside hydrolase gene family 5 retrieved from different industrial-scale biogas processes. OTUs operational taxonomic units identified in this study, P-OTUs operational taxonomic units identified in Sun et al. [29])
Fig. 6Phylogenetic tree of sequences from glycoside hydrolase gene family 48 retrieved from different industrial-scale biogas processes. OTUs operational taxonomic units identified in this study, P-OTUs operational taxonomic units identified in Sun et al. [29]
Fig. 7Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of a the major OTUs at genus level of the 16S rRNA gene and b the T-RFs of cel5 community, within 10 industrial-scale biogas plants. CD 01–04 co-digestion plants, WWTP 01–06 wastewater treatment plants. Ammonia free ammonia, OLR organic loading rate, HRT hydraulic retention time, VFA volatile fatty acids, C50/80 and S50/80: the inverse of days needed to reach 50/80 % of final methane potential for cellulose and straw, respectively