| Literature DB >> 27240257 |
Paula J Cranfill1,2, Brittney R Sell1, Michelle A Baird1, John R Allen1, Zeno Lavagnino2,3, H Martijn de Gruiter4, Gert-Jan Kremers4, Michael W Davidson1, Alessandro Ustione2,3, David W Piston2,3.
Abstract
The advent of fluorescent proteins (FPs) for genetic labeling of molecules and cells has revolutionized fluorescence microscopy. Genetic manipulations have created a vast array of bright and stable FPs spanning blue to red spectral regions. Common to autofluorescent FPs is their tight β-barrel structure, which provides the rigidity and chemical environment needed for effectual fluorescence. Despite the common structure, each FP has unique properties. Thus, there is no single 'best' FP for every circumstance, and each FP has advantages and disadvantages. To guide decisions about which FP is right for a given application, we have quantitatively characterized the brightness, photostability, pH stability and monomeric properties of more than 40 FPs to enable straightforward and direct comparison between them. We focus on popular and/or top-performing FPs in each spectral region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27240257 PMCID: PMC4927352 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Methods ISSN: 1548-7091 Impact factor: 28.547