| Literature DB >> 27239378 |
Mayank Sharma1, Rajesh Sharma1, Dinesh Kumar Jain2.
Abstract
Oral administration is the most convenient route among various routes of drug delivery as it offers high patient compliance. However, the poor aqueous solubility and poor enzymatic/metabolic stability of drugs are major limitations in successful oral drug delivery. There are several approaches to improve problems related to hydrophobic drugs. Among various approaches, nanotechnology based drug delivery system has potential to overcome the challenges associated with the oral route of administration. Novel drug delivery systems are available in many areas of medicine. The application of these systems in the treatment of hypertension continues to broaden. The present review focuses on various nanocarriers available in oral drug administration for improving solubility profile, dissolution, and consequently bioavailability of hydrophobic antihypertensive drugs.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27239378 PMCID: PMC4867069 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8525679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scientifica (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-908X
Figure 1Reasons for poor oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs.
Summary of some of the investigations on nanosystems of antihypertensive drugs.
| Name of drug | Colloidal system | Application | Ref. number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carvedilol | Solid lipid nanoparticles | Enhanced bioavailability and protecting it from acidic environment | [ |
| Nanosuspensions | Increased oral bioavailability | [ | |
| Carbon nanotubes | Drug loading capacity and improving the solubility | [ | |
| Mesoporous silica nanoparticles | Improvement in drug loading and drug release profile | ||
|
| |||
| Nebivolol | Polymeric nanoparticles | Prolonged drug release | [ |
|
| |||
| Valsartan | Solid lipid nanoparticles | Bypassing first-pass metabolism, enhancing lymphatic absorption, and improving solubility and bioavailability | [ |
| Nanosuspensions | Enhanced drug release | [ | |
| Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system | Increase in dissolution rate | [ | |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Prolonged release of drug and thereby it decreases its dose size, frequency of dose, and side effects | [ | |
| Proliposomes | Good flowability and particle size distribution and well conversion into liposomes by hydration and desirable | [ | |
|
| |||
| Felodipine | Nanosuspensions | Enhanced solubility and oral bioavailability | [ |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Controllable drug release and effective | [ | |
|
| |||
| Nifedipine | Dendrimers | Enhanced water solubility | [ |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Improved oral bioavailability | [ | |
| Nanocrystals | Enhanced dissolution rate | [ | |
|
| |||
| Candesartan cilexetil | Dendrimers | Improved water solubility | [ |
| Nanosuspension | Improved bioavailability | [ | |
| Polymeric micelles | Increased drug loading capacity and drug release | [ | |
|
| |||
| Nitrendipine | Solid lipid nanoparticles | Enhanced bioavailability | [ |
| Nanoemulsion | Improved therapeutic efficacy and bioavailability | [ | |
| Nanocrystals | Improvement in physical stability, | [ | |
Figure 2Comparison of in vitro drug release profiles of Telmisartan (TLM) loaded nanosuspension, marketed formulation, and conventional tablets.
Figure 3Comparison of in vitro drug release profile of SNEDDS containing valsartan powder with valsartan tablet.