| Literature DB >> 21886909 |
Chetan Detroja1, Sandip Chavhan, Krutika Sawant.
Abstract
The objective of the present investigation was to enhance the oral bioavailability of practically insoluble Candesartan cilexetil [CC] by preparing nanosuspension. The nanosuspension was prepared by media milling using zirconium oxide beads and converted to solid state by spray drying. The spray dried nanosuspension of CC [SDCN] was evaluated for particle size, zeta potential, saturation solubility, crystallanity, surface morphology and dissolution behavior. SDCN showed particle size of 223.5±5.4 nm and zeta potential of -32.2±0.6 mV while saturation solubility of bulk CC and SDCN were 125±6.9 μg/ml and 2805±29.5 μg/ml respectively, showing more than 20 times increase in solubility. Differential Scanning Calorimetry [DSC] and X-ray diffraction [XRD] analysis showed that crystalline state of CC remained unchanged in SDCN. Dissolution studies in phosphate buffer pH 6.5 containing 0.7% Tween 20 showed that 53±5% of bulk drug dissolved in 15 min whereas SDCN was almost completely dissolved exhibiting higher dissolution velocity and solubility. Transmission electron microscopy [TEM] revealed that nanocrystals were not of uniform size, and approximately of oval shape. Pharmacodynamic study based on deoxycorticosterone acetate [DOCA] salt model was performed in rats to evaluate in-vivo performance, which showed 26.75±0.33% decrease in systolic blood pressure for nanosuspension while plain drug suspension showed 16.0±0.38% reduction, indicating that increase in dissolution velocity and saturation solubility leads to enhancement of bioavailability of SDCN when compared to bulk CC suspension. Thus, the results conclusively demonstrated a significant enhancement in antihypertensive activity of candesartan when formulated as nanosuspension.Entities:
Keywords: Bioavailability; Candesartan; DOCA salt model; Nanosuspension; Saturation solubility
Year: 2011 PMID: 21886909 PMCID: PMC3163369 DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1103-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
Fig. 1.Chemical Structure of Candesartan Cilexetil
Fig. 2.X-ray Diffraction pattern of bulk drug, formulation, Poloxamer 407 and Mannitol
Fig. 3.DSC thermogram of Candesartan cilexetil bulk powder, Poloxamer 407, physical mixture and spray dried nanosuspension(SDCN).
Fig. 4.TEM photograph of Nanosuspension (Bar line= 500nm).
Fig. 5.Dissolution rate of plain drug and spray dried nanosuspension of Candesartan cilexetil.
Fig. 6.Change in particle size of nanosuspension and spray dried nanosuspension at various conditions.
Assay of optimized batches of nanosuspension at various conditions
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room temperature | Nanosuspension | 99.73±0.36 | 99.01±0.36 | 98.25±0.65 | 97.96±0.25 |
|
| |||||
| Spray-dried Nanosuspension | 98.75±0.35 | 98.05±0.36 | 97.59±0.85 | 96.98±0.25 | |
|
| |||||
| Refrigerator | Nanosuspension | 99.79±0.91 | 99.25±0.12 | 98.75±0.15 | 98.02±0.12 |
|
| |||||
| Spray-dried Nanosuspension | 98.69±0.61 | 98.14±0.16 | 97.75±0.35 | 97.18±0.14 | |
Mean systolic blood pressure in different groups of rats
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNX rats | 107±3.2 | 119±2.5 | 124±2.5 | – | 135±5.2 | – | |
|
| |||||||
| DOCA rats | D0 | 110±4.6 | 126±2.9 | 153±6.1 | – | 165±4.6 | – |
| D1 | 105±6.2 | 121±1.9 | 156±3.1 | 139±5.2 | 128±2.4 | 17.94±0.357 | |
| D2 | 109±3.9 | 124±3.8 | 152±5.9 | 142±3.2 | 138±3.2 | 12.89±0.425 | |
| D3 | 115±5.4 | 129±5.2 | 157±5.9 | 127±5.2 | 115±2.1 | 26.75±0.335 | |
| D4 | 114±3.5 | 128±2.5 | 150±6.1 | 136±4.3 | 126±2.6 | 16.0±0.379 | |
%decrease in systolic blood pressure after one week of treatment in comparison to that of after 14 days (Actual measurements were done daily in all treatment groups but here for comparison one week time point was used); Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n=4);
P < 0.05, compared with rats receiving plain drug suspension; D0: DOCA control (no treatment); D1: rats receiving low dose nanosuspension; D2: rats receiving low dose plain drug suspension; D3: rats receiving high dose nanosuspension; D4: rats receiving low dose plain drug suspension.
Fig. 7.% Decrease in systolic blood pressure after treatment in different groups. (*…Indicates significant difference between two groups)