PURPOSE: We had conducted a comprehensive study on preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetics of nimodipine nanocrystals for oral administration previously, and nimodipine nanocrystals displayed lower dissolution profiles but higher bioavailability than Nimotop(®). In this study, we aimed at elucidating the reasons of unfavorable in vitro in vivo correlation for NMD nanocrystals and Nimotop(®) with a hypothesis that special oral absorption mechanism was involved in the absorption of nimodipine nanocrystals. METHODS: Investigations of oral absorption mechanism of the nanocrystals were performed on everted gut sac models, lymphatically (mesenteric lymph duct) cannulated SD rats, Caco-2 cell monolayers and chylomicron flow blocking rats, respectively. RESULTS: The permeability of nanocrystals in duodenum, ileum and colon was not superior to that of Nimotop(®), suggestive of special absorption mechanisms involved. Exudates of nanocrystals from enterocytes were detected in mesenteric lymphatic fluids using a transmission electron microscope, and the bioavailability was only about half of the control after the mesenteric lymph was blocked. The nanocrystals were taken up by enterocytes via macropinocytosis and caveolin-mediated endocytosis pathways. CONCLUSIONS: It was impossible to establish a favorable in vitro in vivo correlation for NMD nanocrystals and Nimotop(®), because portions of the nanocrystals underwent macropinocytosis and caveolin-mediated endocytosis by enterocytes as intact nanocrystal forms, then bypassed the liver first-pass metabolism.
PURPOSE: We had conducted a comprehensive study on preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetics of nimodipine nanocrystals for oral administration previously, and nimodipine nanocrystals displayed lower dissolution profiles but higher bioavailability than Nimotop(®). In this study, we aimed at elucidating the reasons of unfavorable in vitro in vivo correlation for NMD nanocrystals and Nimotop(®) with a hypothesis that special oral absorption mechanism was involved in the absorption of nimodipine nanocrystals. METHODS: Investigations of oral absorption mechanism of the nanocrystals were performed on everted gut sac models, lymphatically (mesenteric lymph duct) cannulated SD rats, Caco-2 cell monolayers and chylomicron flow blocking rats, respectively. RESULTS: The permeability of nanocrystals in duodenum, ileum and colon was not superior to that of Nimotop(®), suggestive of special absorption mechanisms involved. Exudates of nanocrystals from enterocytes were detected in mesenteric lymphatic fluids using a transmission electron microscope, and the bioavailability was only about half of the control after the mesenteric lymph was blocked. The nanocrystals were taken up by enterocytes via macropinocytosis and caveolin-mediated endocytosis pathways. CONCLUSIONS: It was impossible to establish a favorable in vitro in vivo correlation for NMD nanocrystals and Nimotop(®), because portions of the nanocrystals underwent macropinocytosis and caveolin-mediated endocytosis by enterocytes as intact nanocrystal forms, then bypassed the liver first-pass metabolism.
Authors: Sandeep K Singh; Vishal Makadia; Shweta Sharma; Mamunur Rashid; Sudhir Shahi; Prabhat R Mishra; Mohammed Wahajuddin; Jiaur R Gayen Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.617
Authors: Samaa Alrushaid; Casey L Sayre; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Sanjeewa N Senadheera; Frank J Burczynski; Raimar Löbenberg; Neal M Davies Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 6.321