| Literature DB >> 27235842 |
Pathum M Weerawarna1, Yunjeong Kim2, Anushka C Galasiti Kankanamalage1, Vishnu C Damalanka1, Gerald H Lushington3, Kevin R Alliston1, Nurjahan Mehzabeen4, Kevin P Battaile5, Scott Lovell4, Kyeong-Ok Chang6, William C Groutas7.
Abstract
Outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis caused by noroviruses constitute a public health concern worldwide. To date, there are no approved drugs or vaccines for the management and prophylaxis of norovirus infections. A potentially effective strategy for the development of norovirus therapeutics entails the discovery of inhibitors of norovirus 3CL protease, an enzyme essential for noroviral replication. We describe herein the structure-based design of the first class of permeable, triazole-based macrocyclic inhibitors of norovirus 3C-like protease, as well as pertinent X-ray crystallographic, biochemical, spectroscopic, and antiviral studies. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.Entities:
Keywords: 3CL protease; Macrocyclic inhibitors; Norovirus; β-strand conformation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27235842 PMCID: PMC4916972 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.04.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Chem ISSN: 0223-5234 Impact factor: 6.514
Fig. 1General structure of macrocyclic inhibitor (I).
Fig. 2A) Schematic representation of antiparallel β-sheet like hydrogen bonding between NV 3CLpro and the tripeptidyl inhibitor. B) Macrocyclization of the tripeptidyl inhibitor by connecting the P1 and P3 residues.
Activity of compounds 1–11 against norovirus 3CL protease and norovirus cell-based replicon cells.
| Compound | R | m | n | Ring size | IC50(μM) | EC50 (μM) | CC50(μM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isobutyl | 1 | 2 | 17 | 1.6 | 53.2 | >100 | |
| Cyclohexyl | 1 | 2 | 17 | 2.9 | 25.5 | >100 | |
| Isobutyl | 1 | 3 | 18 | 2.4 | 81.5 | >100 | |
| Cyclohexyl | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.6 | 16.1 | >100 | |
| Isobutyl | 1 | 4 | 19 | 6.4 | 46.3 | >100 | |
| Cyclohexyl | 1 | 4 | 19 | 1.4 | 30.5 | >100 | |
| Isobutyl | 1 | 5 | 20 | 3.7 | 6.2 | >100 | |
| Cyclohexyl | 1 | 5 | 20 | 24.5 | 3.8 | >100 | |
| Isobutyl | 1 | 6 | 21 | 4.1 | 42.1 | >100 | |
| Cyclohexyl | 1 | 6 | 21 | 6.1 | 88.3 | >100 | |
| Phenyl | 1 | 6 | 21 | 36.5 | 29.5 | >100 |
Scheme 1Synthesis of key intermediates.
Scheme 2Synthesis of macrocyclic aldehydes via intramolecular Huisgen cycloaddtion.
Scheme 3Synthesis of macrocyclic aldehydes via macrolactamization.
Scheme 4Synthesis of macrocyclic aldehyde 12.
Scheme 5Synthesis of linear aldehyde 34.
Fig. 3Hydrogen bonding interactions derived from co-crystal structures of three inhibitors bound to NV 3CLpro. A) NV 3CLpro:1 complex. B) NV 3CLpro:3 complex. C) NV 3CLpro:10 complex.
Fig. 4Fo–Fc electron density maps contoured at 3σ for three inhibitors (left) and same inhibitors colored according to B-factors (right) (minimum = 10, maximum = 50). A) NV3CLpro:10 complex. B) NV 3CLpro:3 complex. C) NV 3CLpro:1 complex.
Fig. 5Comparison of the high-resolution X-ray crystal structures of the NV 3CLpro:10 (orange) and NV 3CLpro:1 (magenta) complexes. Inhibitors 10 and 1 are colored yellow and cyan respectively. A) Superposition NV 3CLpro:10 and NV 3CLpro:1 highlighting the differences in the region spanning Thr 134 to His 157. The arrows indicate that conformation differences in Thr 134/Pro 136 in the flexible loop region. B and C) Differences in hydrogen bond/close contacts (dashed lines) in the flexible loop region for 3CLpro:10 and NV 3CLpro:1 respectively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Temperature dependence of amide hydrogens.
| Compound | Ring size | Temperature dependence of NH (Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glutamine (P1) | Leucine (P2) | Carbamate (P3) | ||
| 17 | −4.5 | −4.9 | −4.2 | |
| 20 | −5.5 | −5.0 | −7.0 | |
| 21 | −4.5 | −5.7 | −6.4 | |
3JNH-CHα coupling constant values of precursor macrocyclic esters.
| Compound | 3JNH-CHα (Hz) | Ring size | β-strand | IC50(μM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P2 | P3 | |||||
| Gln | Leu | Cha | Cab | ||||
| 9.76 | 4.69 | – | 8.20 | 17 | Yes | 1.2 | |
| 9.46 | – | 4.41 | 8.60 | 17 | Yes | 2.9 | |
| 8.20 | 7.42 | – | 7.03 | 18 | No | 2.4 | |
| 8.20 | – | 7.42 | 7.81 | 18 | No | 1.6 | |
| 7.81 | 7.42 | – | 7.81 | 19 | No | 6.4 | |
| 7.42 | – | 7.72 | 7.81 | 19 | No | 1.4 | |
| 7.42 | 7.81 | – | 8.6 | 20 | No | 3.7 | |
| 6.64 | – | 7.81 | ND | 20 | No | 24.5 | |
| 7.81 | 8.2 | – | 5.86 | 21 | No | 4.1 | |
| 7.63 | – | 7.63 | 6.1 | 21 | No | 6.1 | |
β-strand conformation with respect to P1 and P3 residues.
IC50 values of corresponding aldehydes of the precursor esters.
Not detected due to overlapping resonances.
Crystallographic data for norovirus 3CL protease:Inhibitor structures.
| NV 3CLpro:1 | NV 3CLpro:3 | NV 3CLpro:10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) | |||
| Space group | |||
| Resolution (Å) | 33.24–1.20 (1.22–1.20) | 37.01–1.95 (2.00–1.95) | 32.63–1.20 (1.22–1.20) |
| Wavelength (Å) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Temperature (K) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Observed reflections | 147,835 | 43,724 | 264,169 |
| Unique reflections | 44,826 | 24,256 | 42,941 |
| <I/σ(I)> | 14.1 (2.1) | 8.0 (1.7) | 16.3 (1.9) |
| Completeness (%) | 96.7 (94.2) | 95.2 (94.0) | 96.5 (93.7) |
| Multiplicity | 3.3 (3.2) | 1.8 (1.8) | 5.7 (3.6) |
| | 3.7 (58.0) | 4.6 (44.2) | 5.8 (78.7) |
| | 4.4 (69.4) | 6.5 (62.5) | 6.3 (92.4) |
| | 2.4 (37.7) | 4.6 (44.2) | 2.5 (47.6) |
| CC1/2 | 0.999 (0.758) | 0.997 (0.755) | 0.999 (0.688) |
| Resolution (Å) | 31.18–1.20 | 37.01–1.95 | 31.96–1.20 |
| Reflections (working/test) | 42,608/2205 | 22,998/1244 | 40,906/2020 |
| | 13.8/16.1 | 18.3/21.9 | 13.7/16.5 |
| No. of atoms (protein/ligand/water) | 1292/32/165 | 2395/33/94 | 1295/46/170 |
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Bond angles (o) | 1.109 | 1.136 | 1.087 |
| All Atoms | 20.1 | 38.6 | 19.0 |
| Protein | 18.5 | 38.6 | 17.4 |
| Ligand | 24.1 | 38.3 | 22.7 |
| Water | 32.3 | 38.9 | 30.5 |
| Coordinate error (maximum likelihood) (Å) | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.10 |
| Most favored (%) | 98.9 | 97.5 | 97.2 |
| Additionally allowed (%) | 1.1 | 2.5 | 2.8 |
Values in parenthesis are for the highest resolution shell.
Rmerge = ΣΣ |I(hkl) - |/ΣΣI(hkl), where I(hkl) is the intensity measured for the ith reflection and is the average intensity of all reflections with indices hkl.
Rfactor = Σ ||Fobs (hkl) | − |Fcalc (hkl) ||/Σ |Fobs (hkl)|; Rfree is calculated in an identical manner using 5% of randomly selected reflections that were not included in the refinement.
Rmeas = redundancy-independent (multiplicity-weighted) Rmerge[46]. Rpim = precision-indicating (multiplicity-weighted) Rmerge[47], [48].
CC1/2 is the correlation coefficient of the mean intensities between two random half-sets of data [49], [50].