Literature DB >> 27235626

SCR7 is neither a selective nor a potent inhibitor of human DNA ligase IV.

George E Greco1, Yoshihiro Matsumoto2, Rhys C Brooks2, Zhengfei Lu3, Michael R Lieber3, Alan E Tomkinson4.   

Abstract

DNA ligases are attractive therapeutics because of their involvement in completing the repair of almost all types of DNA damage. A series of DNA ligase inhibitors with differing selectivity for the three human DNA ligases were identified using a structure-based approach with one of these inhibitors being used to inhibit abnormal DNA ligase IIIα-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB)s in breast cancer, neuroblastoma and leukemia cell lines. Raghavan and colleagues reported the characterization of a derivative of one of the previously identified DNA ligase inhibitors, which they called SCR7 (designated SCR7-R in our experiments using SCR7). SCR7 appeared to show increased selectivity for DNA ligase IV, inhibit the repair of DSBs by the DNA ligase IV-dependent non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, reduce tumor growth, and increase the efficacy of DSB-inducing therapeutic modalities in mouse xenografts. In attempting to synthesize SCR7, we encountered problems with the synthesis procedures and discovered discrepancies in its reported structure. We determined the structure of a sample of SCR7 and a related compound, SCR7-G, that is the major product generated by the published synthesis procedure for SCR7. We also found that SCR7-G has the same structure as the compound (SCR7-X) available from a commercial vendor (XcessBio). The various SCR7 preparations had similar activity in DNA ligation assay assays, exhibiting greater activity against DNA ligases I and III than DNA ligase IV. Furthermore, SCR7-R failed to inhibit DNA ligase IV-dependent V(D)J recombination in a cell-based assay. Based on our results, we conclude that SCR7 and the SCR7 derivatives are neither selective nor potent inhibitors of DNA ligase IV.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA double strand break repair; DNA ligase inhibitors; Human DNA ligases; Non-homologous end-joining

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235626      PMCID: PMC5042453          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  30 in total

1.  Targeting abnormal DNA double-strand break repair in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukemias.

Authors:  L A Tobin; C Robert; A P Rapoport; I Gojo; M R Baer; A E Tomkinson; F V Rassool
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Elevated expression of DNA ligase I in human cancers.

Authors:  D Sun; R Urrabaz; M Nguyen; J Marty; S Stringer; E Cruz; L Medina-Gundrum; S Weitman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  The identification and characterization of mammalian proteins involved in the rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in vitro.

Authors:  A P Johnson; M P Fairman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  The joining of non-complementary DNA double-strand breaks by mammalian extracts.

Authors:  R M Mason; J Thacker; M P Fairman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  DNA ligase III is recruited to DNA strand breaks by a zinc finger motif homologous to that of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Identification of two functionally distinct DNA binding regions within DNA ligase III.

Authors:  Z B Mackey; C Niedergang; J M Murcia; J Leppard; K Au; J Chen; G de Murcia; A E Tomkinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-07-30       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Van Trung Chu; Timm Weber; Benedikt Wefers; Wolfgang Wurst; Sandrine Sander; Klaus Rajewsky; Ralf Kühn
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  DNA end-joining catalyzed by human cell-free extracts.

Authors:  P Baumann; S C West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mechanistic constraints on diversity in human V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  G H Gauss; M R Lieber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  An inhibitor of nonhomologous end-joining abrogates double-strand break repair and impedes cancer progression.

Authors:  Mrinal Srivastava; Mridula Nambiar; Sheetal Sharma; Subhas S Karki; G Goldsmith; Mahesh Hegde; Sujeet Kumar; Monica Pandey; Ram K Singh; Pritha Ray; Renuka Natarajan; Madhura Kelkar; Abhijit De; Bibha Choudhary; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Eric Danner; Sanum Bashir; Saniye Yumlu; Wolfgang Wurst; Benedikt Wefers; Ralf Kühn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Ways of improving precise knock-in by genome-editing technologies.

Authors:  Svetlana A Smirnikhina; Arina A Anuchina; Alexander V Lavrov
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Generation and validation of homozygous fluorescent knock-in cells using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.

Authors:  Birgit Koch; Bianca Nijmeijer; Moritz Kueblbeck; Yin Cai; Nike Walther; Jan Ellenberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  DNA Ligase IV Guides End-Processing Choice during Nonhomologous End Joining.

Authors:  Michael P Conlin; Dylan A Reid; George W Small; Howard H Chang; Go Watanabe; Michael R Lieber; Dale A Ramsden; Eli Rothenberg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Reproducibility: Check your chemistry.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  DNA double-strand breaks repair inhibitors potentiates the combined effect of VP-16 and CDDP in human colorectal adenocarcinoma (LoVo) cells.

Authors:  Paulina Kopa; Anna Macieja; Elzbieta Pastwa; Ireneusz Majsterek; Tomasz Poplawski
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 7.  Targeting DNA repair and replication stress in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Junko Murai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Clinically Applicable Inhibitors Impacting Genome Stability.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Juan F Garcia-Moreno; James A L Brown; Emer Bourke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  Modulation of DNA double-strand break repair as a strategy to improve precise genome editing.

Authors:  Ujjayinee Ray; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Highly Efficient and Versatile Plasmid-Based Gene Editing in Primary T Cells.

Authors:  Mara Kornete; Romina Marone; Lukas T Jeker
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.