Literature DB >> 28374058

Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.

Eric Danner1, Sanum Bashir1,2, Saniye Yumlu1,2, Wolfgang Wurst3,4,5,6, Benedikt Wefers3,4, Ralf Kühn7,8.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are produced intentionally by RNA-guided nucleases to achieve genome editing through DSB repair. These breaks are repaired by one of two main repair pathways, classic non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) and homology-directed repair (HDR), the latter being restricted to the S/G2 phases of the cell cycle and notably less frequent. Precise genome editing applications rely on HDR, with the abundant c-NHEJ formed mutations presenting a barrier to achieving high rates of precise sequence modifications. Here, we give an overview of HDR- and c-NHEJ-mediated DSB repair in gene editing and summarize the current efforts to promote HDR over c-NHEJ.

Keywords:  Gene Editing; Homologous Recombination; Homologous Recombination Pathway; Repair Template; U2OS Cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28374058     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-017-9688-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  103 in total

1.  MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Manuel Stucki; Julie A Clapperton; Duaa Mohammad; Michael B Yaffe; Stephen J Smerdon; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes.

Authors:  Alexis C Komor; Ahmed H Badran; David R Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Christopher E Nelson; Chady H Hakim; David G Ousterout; Pratiksha I Thakore; Eirik A Moreb; Ruth M Castellanos Rivera; Sarina Madhavan; Xiufang Pan; F Ann Ran; Winston X Yan; Aravind Asokan; Feng Zhang; Dongsheng Duan; Charles A Gersbach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases.

Authors:  Shengdar Q Tsai; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Chen Yu; Yanxia Liu; Tianhua Ma; Kai Liu; Shaohua Xu; Yu Zhang; Honglei Liu; Marie La Russa; Min Xie; Sheng Ding; Lei S Qi
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells.

Authors:  Alexandre Orthwein; Sylvie M Noordermeer; Marcus D Wilson; Sébastien Landry; Radoslav I Enchev; Alana Sherker; Meagan Munro; Jordan Pinder; Jayme Salsman; Graham Dellaire; Bing Xia; Matthias Peter; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems.

Authors:  Tetsushi Sakuma; Shota Nakade; Yuto Sakane; Ken-Ichi T Suzuki; Takashi Yamamoto
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Shota Nakade; Takuya Tsubota; Yuto Sakane; Satoshi Kume; Naoaki Sakamoto; Masanobu Obara; Takaaki Daimon; Hideki Sezutsu; Takashi Yamamoto; Tetsushi Sakuma; Ken-ichi T Suzuki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Sojung Kim; Sunghyun Kim; Jeongbin Park; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  20 in total

1.  Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes.

Authors:  Nathaniel Graham; Gunvant B Patil; David M Bubeck; Raymond C Dobert; Kevin C Glenn; Annie T Gutsche; Sandeep Kumar; John A Lindbo; Luis Maas; Gregory D May; Miguel E Vega-Sanchez; Robert M Stupar; Peter L Morrell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  New developments in the molecular treatment of ichthyosis: review of the literature.

Authors:  M D W Joosten; J M K Clabbers; N Jonca; J Mazereeuw-Hautier; A H Gostyński
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.303

Review 3.  Precision gene editing technology and applications in nephrology.

Authors:  Zachary WareJoncas; Jarryd M Campbell; Gabriel Martínez-Gálvez; William A C Gendron; Michael A Barry; Peter C Harris; Caroline R Sussman; Stephen C Ekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Making ends meet: targeted integration of DNA fragments by genome editing.

Authors:  Yutaka Yamamoto; Susan A Gerbi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Functional genomics and assays of regulatory activity detect mechanisms at loci for lipid traits and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Tamara S Roman; Karen L Mohlke
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  An Optimized Preparation Method for Long ssDNA Donors to Facilitate Quick Knock-In Mouse Generation.

Authors:  Yukiko U Inoue; Yuki Morimoto; Mayumi Yamada; Ryosuke Kaneko; Kazumi Shimaoka; Shinji Oki; Mayuko Hotta; Junko Asami; Eriko Koike; Kei Hori; Mikio Hoshino; Itaru Imayoshi; Takayoshi Inoue
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Endogenous protein tagging in medaka using a simplified CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in approach.

Authors:  Ali Seleit; Alexander Aulehla; Alexandre Paix
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Precision genome editing using synthesis-dependent repair of Cas9-induced DNA breaks.

Authors:  Alexandre Paix; Andrew Folkmann; Daniel H Goldman; Heather Kulaga; Michael J Grzelak; Dominique Rasoloson; Supriya Paidemarry; Rachel Green; Randall R Reed; Geraldine Seydoux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Application of long single-stranded DNA donors in genome editing: generation and validation of mouse mutants.

Authors:  Gemma F Codner; Joffrey Mianné; Adam Caulder; Jorik Loeffler; Rachel Fell; Ruairidh King; Alasdair J Allan; Matthew Mackenzie; Fran J Pike; Christopher V McCabe; Skevoulla Christou; Sam Joynson; Marie Hutchison; Michelle E Stewart; Saumya Kumar; Michelle M Simon; Loranne Agius; Quentin M Anstee; Kirill E Volynski; Dimitri M Kullmann; Sara Wells; Lydia Teboul
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 10.  Present and future prospects for wheat improvement through genome editing and advanced technologies.

Authors:  Shaoya Li; Chen Zhang; Jingying Li; Lei Yan; Ning Wang; Lanqin Xia
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2021-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.