Literature DB >> 28643177

Targeting DNA repair and replication stress in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Junko Murai1.   

Abstract

Approximately half of high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancers incur alterations in genes of homologous recombination (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, Fanconi anemia genes), and the rest incur alterations in other DNA repair pathways at high frequencies. Such cancer-specific gene alterations can confer selective sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as cisplatin and carboplatin, topotecan, etoposide, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine. Originally presumed to inhibit DNA repair, PARP inhibitors that have recently been approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer also act as DNA damaging agents by inducing PARP-DNA complexes. These DNA damaging agents induce different types of DNA lesions that require various DNA repair genes for the repair, but commonly induce replication fork slowing or stalling, also referred to as replication stress. Replication stress activates DNA repair checkpoint proteins (ATR, CHK1), which prevent further DNA damage. Hence, targeting DNA repair genes or DNA repair checkpoint genes augments the anti-tumor activity of DNA damaging agents. This review describes the rational basis for using DNA repair and DNA repair checkpoint inhibitors as single agents. The review also presents the strategies combining these inhibitors with DNA damaging agents for ovarian cancer therapy based on specific gene alterations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATR; BRCA; CHK1; Cell cycle; Cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor; Cisplatin; DNA damage; Homologous recombination; PARP inhibitor; Replication stress; Synthetic lethality; Topoisomerase inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28643177     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1145-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  96 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Conformational determinants for the recruitment of ERCC1 by XPA in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) Pathway: structure and dynamics of the XPA binding motif.

Authors:  Elisa Fadda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA.

Authors:  Luis Ignacio Toledo; Matthias Altmeyer; Maj-Britt Rask; Claudia Lukas; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Lou Klitgaard Povlsen; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Niels Mailand; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Identification of novel PARP inhibitors using a cell-based TDP1 inhibitory assay in a quantitative high-throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Junko Murai; Christophe Marchand; Sampada A Shahane; Hongmao Sun; Ruili Huang; Yiping Zhang; Adel Chergui; Jiuping Ji; James H Doroshow; Ajit Jadhav; Shunichi Takeda; Menghang Xia; Yves Pommier
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-29

5.  LY2606368 Causes Replication Catastrophe and Antitumor Effects through CHK1-Dependent Mechanisms.

Authors:  Constance King; H Bruce Diaz; Samuel McNeely; Darlene Barnard; Jack Dempsey; Wayne Blosser; Richard Beckmann; David Barda; Mark S Marshall
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 6.  Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond.

Authors:  Yves Pommier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Authors:  Michelle K Zeman; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Ku86 represses lethal telomere deletion events in human somatic cells.

Authors:  Yongbao Wang; Goutam Ghosh; Eric A Hendrickson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lloyd Kelland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by Clinical PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Junko Murai; Shar-yin N Huang; Benu Brata Das; Amelie Renaud; Yiping Zhang; James H Doroshow; Jiuping Ji; Shunichi Takeda; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 13.312

View more
  28 in total

1.  Prediction of DNA Repair Inhibitor Response in Short-Term Patient-Derived Ovarian Cancer Organoids.

Authors:  Sarah J Hill; Brennan Decker; Emma A Roberts; Neil S Horowitz; Michael G Muto; Michael J Worley; Colleen M Feltmate; Marisa R Nucci; Elizabeth M Swisher; Huy Nguyen; Chunyu Yang; Ryuji Morizane; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Joyce F Liu; Joseph V Bonventre; Ursula A Matulonis; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  Disparate effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy on the antiviral activity of antiretroviral therapy: implications for treatments of HIV-infected cancer patients.

Authors:  Sandra Medina-Moreno; Juan C Zapata; Mackenzie L Cottrell; Nhut M Le; Sijia Tao; Joseph Bryant; Edward Sausville; Raymond F Schinazi; Angela Dm Kashuba; Robert R Redfield; Alonso Heredia
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2019

Review 3.  Restored replication fork stabilization, a mechanism of PARP inhibitor resistance, can be overcome by cell cycle checkpoint inhibition.

Authors:  Brittany Haynes; Junko Murai; Jung-Min Lee
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 4.  Schlafen 11 (SLFN11), a restriction factor for replicative stress induced by DNA-targeting anti-cancer therapies.

Authors:  Junko Murai; Anish Thomas; Markku Miettinen; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 5.  Ribonucleotide Reductases: Structure, Chemistry, and Metabolism Suggest New Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Brandon L Greene; Gyunghoon Kang; Chang Cui; Marina Bennati; Daniel G Nocera; Catherine L Drennan; JoAnne Stubbe
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 6.  Targeting the PI3K pathway and DNA damage response as a therapeutic strategy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tzu-Ting Huang; Erika J Lampert; Cynthia Coots; Jung-Min Lee
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Clinical significance of RAD51C and its contribution to ovarian carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Lu; Si-Sun Liu; Zhen-Fang Xiong; Fen Wang; Xia-Ying Li; Huan Deng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-01-01

8.  Coupling the core of the anticancer drug etoposide to an oligonucleotide induces topoisomerase II-mediated cleavage at specific DNA sequences.

Authors:  Lorena Infante Lara; Sabine Fenner; Steven Ratcliffe; Albert Isidro-Llobet; Michael Hann; Ben Bax; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Candidate synthetic lethality partners to PARP inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian clear cell cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Kawahara; Kenji Ogawa; Mika Nagayasu; Mai Kimura; Yoshikazu Sasaki; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 10.  Veliparib in ovarian cancer: a new synthetically lethal therapeutic approach.

Authors:  Stergios Boussios; Peeter Karihtala; Michele Moschetta; Charlotte Abson; Afroditi Karathanasi; Nikolaos Zakynthinakis-Kyriakou; Jake Edward Ryan; Matin Sheriff; Elie Rassy; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.