Literature DB >> 8370887

A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements.

J B Allen1, P F Fahey.   

Abstract

Acoustic intermodulation distortion products (DPs) are generated by the nonlinear motion of the basilar membrane (BM) in the cochlea, and propagate back to the ear canal where they may be measured. One common method of measuring these distortion products is to hold the higher-primary frequency f2 fixed while varying the lower-primary frequency f1. When doing this, it is well known that the ear canal distortion product is maximum for a particular value of f2/f1, usually between 1.1 and 1.4. In fact all odd order distortion products of the form fd(n) = f1 -n(f2-f1), n = 1,2,3,... are maximum at the same fd(n), independent of order n, but dependent on f2 which determines the place of DP generation. In this paper, it is argued that this maximum must result from filtering by micromechanical resonances within the cochlea. In fact the frequency where the neural tuning curve "tip" meets the "tail" is the same as the frequency where the distortion products are maximum. This suggests that each section of the basilar membrane must consist of two resonant impedances. The first is the usual series basilar membrane resonant impedance that gives rise to the characteristic frequency (CF). The second resonant impedance must be tuned to a frequency that is lower than the CF and must act as a shunt across the inner hair-cells, since it acts to reduce the forward transmission to the neuron, while, at the same time, it maximally couples all the distortion products back into the cochlear fluids, giving them a frequency dependent increase at its resonant frequency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8370887     DOI: 10.1121/1.408182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Evidence of tectorial membrane radial motion in a propagating mode of a complex cochlear model.

Authors:  Hongxue Cai; Brett Shoelson; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Threshold and beyond: modeling the intensity dependence of auditory responses.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-14

5.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae.

Authors:  S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Jessica S Lamb; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  A tectorial membrane fovea in the cochlea of the mustached bat.

Authors:  M Kössl; M Vater
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1996-02

9.  Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning.

Authors:  A W Gummer; W Hemmert; H P Zenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Frequency-dependent properties of the tectorial membrane facilitate energy transmission and amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  G P Jones; V A Lukashkina; I J Russell; S J Elliott; A N Lukashkin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.