Literature DB >> 27195213

Should the orthodontic brackets always be removed prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?

Arash Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir1, Manouchehr Rahmati-Kamel2.   

Abstract

Request for temporary removal of orthodontic appliances due to medical conditions that require magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is not uncommon in daily practice in the field of orthodontics. This may be at the expense of time and cost. Metal Orthodontic appliances cause more signal loss and image distortion as compared to ceramic and titanium ones. Stainless steel and large brackets in addition to the oriented miniscrews in relation to the axis of magnetic field may cause severe signal loss and image distortion. Moreover, gradient echo and frequency-selective fat saturation MR protocols are more susceptible to metal artifacts. The spin echo and fat-suppression protocols, low magnetic field strength (e.g., 1.5 Tesla vs. 3 Tesla), small field of view, high-resolution matrix, thin slice, increased echo train length and increased receiver band width could be applied to lessen the metal artifacts in MR images. The larger the distance between an appliance and desired location to be imaged, the lower the distortion and signal loss. Decision to remove brackets should be made based on its composition and desired anatomic location. In this review, first the principles of MR imaging are introduced (Part-I) and then the interactions of orthodontic appliances and magnetic field are farther discussed (Part-II).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Bracket; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metal; Orthodontics

Year:  2015        PMID: 27195213      PMCID: PMC4862114          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  21 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Yoshie Okano; Mitsuaki Yamashiro; Takashi Kaneda; Kazutaka Kasai
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-02

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging.

Authors:  Matthew D Robson; Peter D Gatehouse; Mark Bydder; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  MRI scanning and orthodontics.

Authors:  A Patel; G S Bhavra; J R S O'Neill
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2006-12

4.  Influence of dental materials on dental MRI.

Authors:  O Tymofiyeva; S Vaegler; K Rottner; J Boldt; A J Hopfgartner; P C Proff; E J Richter; P M Jakob
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  MRI scan hazard.

Authors:  D Sinkiewicz
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.

Authors:  Young Han Lee; Daekeon Lim; Eunju Kim; Sungjun Kim; Ho-Taek Song; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI.

Authors:  S Görgülü; S Ayyildiz; K Kamburoglu; S Gökçe; T Ozen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Diagnosis of dental abnormalities in children using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Olga Tymofiyeva; Peter C Proff; Kurt Rottner; Markus Düring; Peter M Jakob; Ernst-Jürgen Richter
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Evaluation of four different optimized magnetic-resonance-imaging sequences for visualization of dental and maxillo-mandibular structures at 3 T.

Authors:  Alexandre T Assaf; Tomislav A Zrnc; Chressen C Remus; Michael Schönfeld; Christian R Habermann; Björn Riecke; Reinhard E Friedrich; Jens Fiehler; Max Heiland; Jan Sedlacik
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Metal artifact reduction in patients with dental implants using multispectral three-dimensional data acquisition for hybrid PET/MRI.

Authors:  Jeanne M Gunzinger; Gaspar Delso; Andreas Boss; Miguel Porto; Helen Davison; Gustav K von Schulthess; Martin Huellner; Paul Stolzmann; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Irene A Burger
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-12-20
View more
  7 in total

1.  MRI safety: MRI and fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  G Stonier; P Hardee
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.

Authors:  Michele Cassetta; Nicola Pranno; Alessandro Stasolla; Nicola Orsogna; Davide Fierro; Costanza Cavallini; Vito Cantisani
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.

Authors:  Adrienn Dobai; Fanni Dembrovszky; Tamás Vízkelety; Péter Barsi; Fanni Juhász; Csaba Dobó-Nagy
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Microleakage beneath orthodontic brackets in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) AT 1.5 & 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Esra Bolat Gümüş; Samed Şatir; Alper Kuştarci
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Effects on Metallic Brackets and Wires: Does It Alter the Temperature and Bonding Efficacy of Orthodontic Devices?

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Lorenzo Preda; Fabrizio Calliada; Lorenzo Carbone; Luca Lungarotti; Luisa Bernardinelli; Paola Gandini; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging metal artifact reduction for eye plaque patient with dental braces.

Authors:  H Michael Gach; Stacie L Mackey; Sana Rehman; Mo Kadbi; Jacqueline E Zoberi; Jose Garcia-Ramirez; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-10-30

7.  In vitro evaluation of a ceramic bracket with a laser-structured base.

Authors:  Selma Elekdag-Türk
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.