Literature DB >> 24925839

Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.

Young Han Lee1, Daekeon Lim1, Eunju Kim2, Sungjun Kim1, Ho-Taek Song1, Jin-Suck Suh3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Fluid-sensitive MR imaging in postoperative evaluation is important, however, metallic artifacts is inevitable. The purpose is to investigate the feasibility of fat-saturated slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC)-corrected T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) at 3T in patients with spinal prostheses.
METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, 27 SEMAC-encoded spinal MRs between September 2012 and October 2013 in patients with spinal metallic prostheses were analyzed. The MR images were scanned on a 3T MR system including SEMAC-corrected and uncorrected fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted MR images with fat-saturation. Two musculoskeletal radiologists compared the image sets and qualitatively analyzed the images using a five-point scale in terms of artifact reduction around the prosthesis, visualization of the prosthesis and pedicle, and intervertebral neural foramina. Quantitative assessments were performed by calculating the ratio of signal intensity from the fixated vertebra and that from upper level vertebra. For statistical analyses, paired t-test was used.
RESULTS: Fat-saturated SEMAC-corrected T2-weighted MR images enabled significantly improved metallic artifact reduction (P<0.05). Quantitative evaluation of the signal intensity ratio of screw-fixated vertebra and upper level vertebra showed a significantly lower ratio on fat-saturated SEMAC images (P<0.05), however, the high signal intensity of signal pile-up could be not completely corrected.
CONCLUSION: SEMAC correction in fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR images can overcome the signal loss of metallic artifacts and provide improved delineation of the pedicle screw and peri-prosthetic region. Signal pile-up, however, could not be corrected completely, therefore readers should be cautious in the evaluation of marrow around the prosthesis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fat suppression; Magnetic resonance; Metallic artifact reduction; Metallic artifacts; Slice encoding for metal artifact correction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925839     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Should the orthodontic brackets always be removed prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?

Authors:  Arash Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir; Manouchehr Rahmati-Kamel
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  MR imaging near metallic implants using MAVRIC SL: initial clinical experience at 3T.

Authors:  Luis B Gutierrez; Bao H Do; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves; Kevin M Koch; Pauline W Worters; Kathryn J Stevens
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Advantages of Radiation Therapy Simulation with 0.35 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stereotactic Ablation of Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Benjamin Spieler; Stuart E Samuels; Ricardo Llorente; Raphael Yechieli; John Chetley Ford; Eric A Mellon
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-26

5.  SEMAC-VAT MR Imaging Unravels Peri-instrumentation Lesions in Patients With Attendant Symptoms After Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  Shun Qi; Zhi-Gang Wu; Yun-Feng Mu; Lang-Lang Gao; Jian Yang; Pan-Li Zuo; Mathias Nittka; Ying Liu; Hai-Qiang Wang; Hong Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T2-weighted Images.

Authors:  Young Han Lee; Seok Hahn; Eunju Kim; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Comparison Study between Conventional Sequence and Slice-Encoding Metal Artifact Correction (SEMAC) in the Diagnosis of Postoperative Complications in Patients Receiving Lumbar Inter-Body Fusion and Pedicle Screw Fixation Surgery.

Authors:  Sol Bee Han; Young Cheol Yoon; Jong Won Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metallic Artifact Reduction of Multiacquisition With Variable Resonance Image Combination Selective-Short Tau Inversion Recovery for Postoperative Cervical Spine With Artificial Disk Replacement: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Jeong Kyeom Kim; Yeo Ju Kim; Seunghun Lee; Daehyun Yoon; Ro Woon Lee; Jung Ui Hong; Dal-Sung Ryu; Jiyoon Bae
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Using SEMAC at 3 T MR to evaluate spinal metallic implants and peripheral soft tissue lesions.

Authors:  Chun Xin; Houdong Liu; Shihong Li; Guangwu Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.