Literature DB >> 28452576

The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.

Michele Cassetta1, Nicola Pranno1, Alessandro Stasolla2, Nicola Orsogna3, Davide Fierro3, Costanza Cavallini3, Vito Cantisani3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of orthodontic stainless steel brackets and two different types of archwires on the diagnostic quality of 3-T MR images.
METHODS: This prospective, case-control study was conducted following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The recruitment was conducted among orthodontic patients. 80 subjects, requiring MRI for the presence of temporomandibular disorders, were enrolled and divided into four groups: 20 patients using aligners (control group); 20 patients with stainless steel brackets without archwires; 20 patients with stainless steel brackets and nickel-titanium archwires; and 20 patients with stainless steel brackets and stainless steel archwires. Two experts in neuroradiology evaluated the images to determine the amount of distortion in 6 regions and 48 districts. A score was subjectively assigned according to a modified receiver operating characteristic method of distortion classification. Any disagreement was resolved through consensus seeking; when this was not possible, a third neuroradiologist was consulted. The following statistical methods were used: descriptive statistics, Cohen's kappa coefficient (k), Kruskal-Wallis test, pairwise comparisons using the Dunn-Bonferroni approach. The significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: The presence of stainless steel brackets with or without archwires negatively influenced MRI of the cervical region, paranasal sinuses, head and neck region, and cervical vertebrae but did not influence MRI of brain and temporomandibular joint regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a stainless steel multibracket orthodontic appliance should remove it before cervical vertebrae, cervical region, paranasal sinuses, and head and neck MRI scans. The brain and temporomandibular joint region MRI should not require the removal of such appliances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; artefacts; orthodontic brackets; orthodontic wires; orthodontics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28452576      PMCID: PMC5606284          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  25 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging abbreviations, definitions, and descriptions: a review.

Authors:  M A Brown; R C Semelka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Shafiei; E Honda; H Takahashi; T Sasaki
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Dental material artifacts on MR images.

Authors:  D B Hinshaw; B A Holshouser; H I Engstrom; A H Tjan; E L Christiansen; W F Catelli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Comparing proton density and turbo spin echo T2 weighted static sequences with dynamic half-Fourier single-shot TSE pulse sequence at 3.0 T in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Cassetta; F Barchetti; N Pranno; M Marini
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them.

Authors:  L Arena; H T Morehouse; J Safir
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging disturbances and the magnetic susceptibility of dental materials.

Authors:  O Beuf; M Lissac; Y Crémillieux; A Briguet
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI.

Authors:  S Görgülü; S Ayyildiz; K Kamburoglu; S Gökçe; T Ozen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Craig A Harris; Lawrence M White
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Anatomic examination of the upper head of the lateral pterygoid muscle using magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data.

Authors:  Dario Mazza; Mario Marini; Luca Impara; Michele Cassetta; Paolo Scarpato; Flavio Barchetti; Carlo Di Paolo
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Metal artifact reduction in patients with dental implants using multispectral three-dimensional data acquisition for hybrid PET/MRI.

Authors:  Jeanne M Gunzinger; Gaspar Delso; Andreas Boss; Miguel Porto; Helen Davison; Gustav K von Schulthess; Martin Huellner; Paul Stolzmann; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Irene A Burger
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-12-20
View more
  4 in total

1.  [Metal objects of the head and neck region in magnetic resonance imaging : Survey among radiologists].

Authors:  Ulrike Kielburg; Felix H Blankenstein
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Patient safety incidents in dentomaxillofacial imaging: reported adverse events from Hospital District Helsinki and Uusimaa and the City of Helsinki during 2012-2017.

Authors:  Marianne Suuronen; Taina Autti; Lasse Lehtonen
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.

Authors:  Adrienn Dobai; Fanni Dembrovszky; Tamás Vízkelety; Péter Barsi; Fanni Juhász; Csaba Dobó-Nagy
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Does a preoperative cone beam CT reduce complication rates in the surgical removal of complex lower third molars? A retrospective study including 486 cases.

Authors:  Jan C Klatt; Tony Sorowka; Lan Kluwe; Ralf Smeets; Martin Gosau; Henning Hanken
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.