| Literature DB >> 27137223 |
Theresia Jumbe1,2, Sarah S Comstock1, Samantha L Hahn1, William S Harris3, Joyce Kinabo2, Jenifer I Fenton1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Tanzania, 35% of all children below five years of age are stunted. Dietary fatty acids (FA) are critical for growth and development. However, whole blood FA levels in Tanzanian children are poorly described.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27137223 PMCID: PMC4854382 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic Characteristics of the Participants.
| Mean ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age groups, mos | 18–36 | 36.1–48 | 48.1–60 | > 60 |
| (n = 108) | (n = 96) | (n = 58) | (n = 72) | |
| Age, mos | 28.9 ± 3.95 | 41.2 ± 3.26 | 54.2 ± 3.75 | 66.6 ± 4.45 |
| Sex, | 56 (51.9) | 41 (42.7) | 30 (51.7) | 28 (38.9) |
| Height, cm | 84.6 ± 4.10 | 93.1 ± 4.90 | 100 ± 5.35 | 106 ± 6.02 |
| Weight, kg | 11.5 ± 1.51 | 13.5 ± 1.67 | 15.2 ± 1.59 | 16.7 ± 2.18 |
| HAZ | -1.71 ± 1.26 | -1.48 ± 1.15 | -1.40 ± 1.10 | -1.52 ± 1.07 |
| Hb, g/dL | 9.91 ± 1.49 | 10.3 ± 1.43 | 10.7 ± 1.23 | 10.4 ± 1.62 |
| + malarial RDT, | 17 (15.7) | 11 (11.5) | 14 (24.1) | 14 (19.4) |
1HAZ, height-for-age z-score; Hb, hemoglobin; mos, months; RDT, rapid detection test
Nutrition and Growth Status of Children.
| Based On | Severe | Moderate | Unaffected | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (< -3 SD) | (< -2 SD) | |||
| Stunting | HAZ | 9.9% | 20.3% | 69.9% |
| Malnutrition | BAZ | 0% | 1.2% | 98.8% |
| Underweight | WAZ | 2.1% | 11% | 86.9% |
| Wasting | WHZ | 0% | 1.5% | 98.5% |
1BAZ, BMI-for-age z score; HAZ, height-for-age z score; WAZ, weight-for-age z score; WHZ, weight-for-height z score. The WHO definitions of moderate and severe stunting, wasting, underweight and malnutrition were applied to the data [49].
Whole Blood Fatty Acid Proportions.
| Fatty Acid | Mean ± SD | Range |
|---|---|---|
| DHA | 2.40 ± 0.66 | 0.88–4.34 |
| ARA | 9.16 ± 1.49 | 3.66–13.10 |
| Myristic | 1.00 ± 0.63 | 0.25–4.89 |
| Palmitic | 27.63 ± 1.92 | 22.63–33 82 |
| Palmitelaidic | 0.09 ± 0.07 | 0.002–0.49 |
| Palmitoleic | 1.61 ± 0.74 | 0.28–4.44 |
| Stearic | 10.39 ± 1.02 | 6.67–12.91 |
| Elaidic | 0.22 ± 0.21 | 0.06–3.52 |
| Oleic | 21.52 ± 2.98 | 14.21–32.74 |
| Linoelaidic | 0.33 ± 0.11 | 0.13–1.13 |
| Linoleic | 17.91 ± 2.79 | 11.48–31.44 |
| Arachidic | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.11–0.42 |
| Glinolenic | 0.28 ± 0.12 | 0.06–0.72 |
| Eicosenoic | 0.23 ± 0.07 | 0.09–0.49 |
| Alpha-linolenic | 0.37 ± 0.18 | 0.10–1.33 |
| Eicosadienoic | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.10–0.56 |
| Behenic | 0.56 ± 0.17 | 0.13–1.16 |
| DGLA | 1.56 ± 0.36 | 1.56–0.36 |
| Lignoceric | 0.60 ± 0.29 | 0.13 ± 1.62 |
| EPA | 0.38 ± 0.19 | 0.05–1.58 |
| Nervonic | 0.53 ± 0.25 | 0.08–1.50 |
| Docosatetraenoic | 1.15 ± 0.26 | 0.39–2.22 |
| DPA n-6 | 0.65 ± 0.15 | 0.24–1.29 |
| DPA n-3 | 0.79 ± 0.22 | 0.31–1.74 |
| Mead | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.02–0.39 |
| Total n-3 | 3.95 ± 0.89 | 1.82–6.25 |
| Total n-6 | 31.05 ± 3.51 | 21.58–40.63 |
| Total n-9 | 22.63 ± 2.93 | 14.99–33.43 |
| Total SatFat | 40.42 ± 1.86 | 34.74–45.81 |
| Total MUFA | 2.24 ± 0.72 | 0.74–5.42 |
| Total PUFA | 35.00 ± 3.77 | 23.40–43.25 |
1Expressed as FA mol%; (n = 334). DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; T/T, triene-to-tetraene
2Total n-3 includes alpha-linolenic, EPA, docosapentaenoic n-3, and DHA.
3Total n-6 includes linoleic, linoelaidic, gamma-linolenic, eicosadienoic, di-homo-gamma-linolenic, arachidonic, docosatetraenoic, docosapentaenoic n-6.
4Total n-9 includes oleic, elaidic, eicosanoic, Mead, nervonic.
5Total saturated fat includes myristic, palmitic, stearic, arachidic, behenic, lignoceric.
6Total MUFA includes palmitoleic, palmitelaidic and nervonic
7Total PUFA included Total n-3 and Total n-6
Regression Results Between HAZ and Selected Fatty Acids.
| Fatty Acid | B ± SE | T-value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oleic | -0.052 ± .020 | -2.503 | |
| Linoleic | 0.061 ± .020 | 2.680 | |
| α-Linolenic | -0.248 ± .365 | -0.680 | 0.497 |
| Mead | -1.877 ± .888 | -2.115 | |
| Arachidonic | 0.070 ± .041 | 1.692 | 0.092 |
| T/T ratio | -20.3 ± 7.37 | -2.755 | |
| Total n-3 | 0.058 ± .063 | 0.907 | 0.365 |
| Total n-6 | 0.064 ± .020 | 3.512 | |
| Total n-9 | -0.054 ±.020 | -2.521 | |
| Total Saturated | -0.071 ± 0.04 | -1.977 |
1Model: HAZ = fatty acid + malaria status + hemoglobin concentration. HAZ, height-for-age z score; T/T, triene-to-tetraene
2Total n-3 includes alpha-linolenic, eicosapentaenoic, docosapentaenoic n-3, and docosahexaenoic.
3Total n-6 includes linoleic, linoelaidic, γ-linolenic, eicosadienoic, di-homo-gamma-linolenic, arachidonic, docosatetraenoic, docosapentaenoic n-6.
4Total n-9 includes oleic, elaidic, eicosanoic, Mead, nervonic.
5Total saturated fat includes myristic, palmitic, stearic, arachidic, behenic, lignoceric.
Regression Results Between BAZ and Selected Fatty Acids.
| Fatty Acid | B ± SE | T-value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oleic | 0.035 ± .016 | 2.14 | |
| Linoleic | -0.021 ± .018 | -1.19 | 0.237 |
| α-Linolenic | 0.041 ± .284 | 0.145 | 0.885 |
| Mead | 1.09 ± .693 | 1.57 | 0.118 |
| Arachidonic | -0.087 ± .032 | -2.73 | |
| T/T ratio | 13.26 ± 5.76 | 2.30 | |
| Total n-3 | -0.015 ± .049 | -0.30 | 0.762 |
| Total n-6 | -0.038 ± .014 | -2.67 | |
| Total n-9 | 0.053 ±.020 | 2.07 | |
| Total Saturated | 0.072 ± .028 | 1.32 | 0.189 |
1Model: BAZ = fatty acid + malaria status + hemoglobin concentration. BAZ, BMI-for-age z- score; T/T, triene-to-tetraene
2Total n-3 includes alpha-linolenic, eicosapentaenoic, docosapentaenoic n-3, and docosahexaenoic.
3Total n-6 includes linoleic, linoelaidic, gamma-linolenic, eicosadienoic, di-homo-gamma-linolenic, arachidonic, docosatetraenoic, docosapentaenoic n-6.
4Total n-9 includes oleic, elaidic, eicosanoic, Mead, nervonic.
5Total saturated fat includes myristic, palmitic, stearic, arachidic, behenic, lignoceric.
Factor Loading Matrix for Fatty Acids in the Whole Blood of 2–6 year old Tanzanian Children.
| Factor 1: | Factor 2: | Factor 3: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stearic | 0.79 | -0.04 | -0.19 |
| AA | 0.89 | 0.05 | -0.16 |
| Docosatetraenoic | 0.74 | 0.12 | 0.01 |
| DPA n-6 | 0.65 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
| DGLA | 0.48 | 0.09 | 0.25 |
| Linoleic | 0.07 | -0.00 | -0.77 |
| Eicosadienoic | 0.39 | 0.24 | -0.06 |
| DPA n-3 | 0.60 | 0.05 | 0.34 |
| DHA | 0.56 | 0.13 | -0.14 |
| Lignoceric | 0.27 | 0.86 | 0.02 |
| Behenic | 0.37 | 0.84 | -0.04 |
| Arachidic | 0.11 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
| Palmitelaidic | 0.14 | 0.34 | -0.06 |
| Eicosenoic | -0.07 | 0.30 | 0.07 |
| Elaidic | -0.08 | 0.29 | -0.15 |
| Nervonic | 0.31 | 0.82 | 0.04 |
| Linoelaidic | -0.19 | 0.21 | 0.20 |
| Palmitic | -0.61 | -0.29 | 0.48 |
| Myristic | -0.13 | -0.22 | 0.29 |
| Mead | -0.06 | -0.09 | 0.66 |
| Palmitoleic | -0.23 | -0.30 | 0.75 |
| Oleic | -0.79 | -0.12 | 0.21 |
| Gamma-linolenic | -0.03 | -0.06 | 0.48 |
| EPA | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.45 |
| Alpha-linolenic | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.38 |
1The factor loading value indicates the correlation between the fatty acid and the factor. AA, arachidonic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; DGLA, dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid
Summary of Significant Associations Between Fatty Acids and Growth Parameters.
| GROWTH PARAMETERS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HAZ | BAZ | WHZ | |
| Oleic | ⬇ | ⬆ | ⬆ |
| Mead | ⬇ | --- | --- |
| ARA | --- | ⬇ | ⬇ |
| Total n-9 | ⬇ | ⬆ | ⬆ |
| Total n-6 | ⬆ | ⬇ | ⬇ |
| T/T ratio | ⬇ | ⬆ | --- |