| Literature DB >> 23221579 |
Liandré F van der Merwe1, Sophie E Moore, Anthony J Fulford, Katherine E Halliday, Saikou Drammeh, Stephen Young, Andrew M Prentice.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intestinal damage and malabsorption caused by chronic environmental enteropathy are associated with growth faltering seen in infants in less-developed countries. Evidence has suggested that supplementary omega-3 (n-3) long-chain PUFAs (LC-PUFAs) might ameliorate this damage by reducing gastrointestinal inflammation. LC-PUFA supplementation may also benefit cognitive development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23221579 PMCID: PMC3522138 DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.042267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0002-9165 Impact factor: 7.045
FIGURE 1.Subject flowchart summarized according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials that shows the number of subjects randomly assigned, lost to follow-up, and analyzed by treatment arm.
Baseline characteristics of study participants
| Characteristics | Fish-oil group | Control group | Differences |
| Male sex [ | 49 (56) | 50 (59) | −3 |
| Age (d) | 92.3 ± 4.25 | 93.2 ± 4.22 | −0.10 |
| Highest level of education of mothers ( | 68 | 68 | — |
| Arabic school ( | |||
| 0–2 y | 26 | 19 | 7 |
| 3–6 y | 28 | 26 | 2 |
| 7–11 y | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| English school ( | |||
| 1–4 y | 4 | 9 | −5 |
| 5–9 y | 6 | 10 | −4 |
| Anthropometric indexes ( | 87 | 85 | — |
| Weight (kg) | 5.86 ± 0.84 | 5.75 ± 0.83 | 0.11 |
| Length (cm) | 60.1 ± 2.20 | 60.0 ± 25.6 | 0.10 |
| HC (cm) | 40.1 ± 1.24 | 40.0 ± 1.29 | 0.10 |
| MUAC (cm) | 13.2 ± 1.15 | 13.0 ± 1.12 | 0.22 |
| Knee-heel length (cm) | 16.1 ± 0.75 | 16.0 ± 0.90 | 0.10 |
| Biceps skinfold thickness (mm) | 6.84 ± 1.24 | 6.72 ± 1.38 | 0.12 |
| Triceps skinfold thickness (mm) | 8.84 ± 1.62 | 8.60 ± 1.71 | 0.24 |
| Subscapular skinfold thickness (mm) | 8.24 ± 1.50 | 8.21 ± 1.79 | 0.03 |
| Plasma FAs (ng/μL) | ( | ( | |
| DHA | 70.2 ± 23.8 | 76.4 ± 23.2 | −6.20 |
| EPA | 23.0 (14.5, 35.5) | 24.3 (16.1, 40.4) | −1.30 |
| AA | 125 ± 42.5 | 133 ± 39.9 | −8.00 |
| Percentage of total FAs | |||
| DHA | 3.75 ± 0.89 | 4.00 ± 0.95 | −0.25 |
| EPA | 1.15 (0.81, 1.66) | 1.31 (0.82, 2.03) | −0.16 |
| AA | 6.66 ± 1.41 | 6.90 ± 1.51 | −0.24 |
| Acute-phase proteins ( | 80 | 78 | — |
| Plasma albumin (mg/L) | 33.0 ± 3.01 | 33.0 ± 2.61 | 0.00 |
| α-Acid glycoprotein (g/L) | 0.95 (0.77, 0.11) | 0.88 (0.69, 0.12) | 0.07 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 3.02 (2.23, 5.31) | 2.91 (2.22, 4.67) | 0.11 |
| Gut integrity ( | 85 | 82 | — |
| Urinary LMR | 0.15 (0.10, 0.22) | 0.15 (0.12, 0.20) | 0.00 |
| Lactulose:lactose ratio | 0.75 (0.53, 1.10) | 0.72 (0.50, 0.98) | 0.03 |
| Lactulose percentage recovery | 0.26 (0.19, 0.45) | 0.24 (0.16, 0.34) | 0.02 |
| Mannitol percentage recovery | 7.02 ± 3.46 | 6.21 ± 2.94 | 0.81 |
| Intestinal inflammation | 82 | 83 | — |
| Calprotectin wet weight (mg/kg) | 1029 (627, 1534) | 1058 (610, 1639) | −29 |
AA, arachidonic acid; FA, fatty acid; HC, head circumference; LMR, lactulose-mannitol ratio; MUAC, midupper arm circumference.
Fish-oil group mean or median minus control group mean or median.
Percentage.
Age on the first day of supplementation.
Mean ± SD (all such values).
Median; 25th, 75th percentiles in parentheses (all such values).
Plasma fatty acid endpoints by treatment groups
| Endpoint | Fish-oil group ( | Control group ( | Effect size (95% CI) | |
| Main LC-PUFAs (percentage of total FA) | ||||
| DHA | 4.87 ± 1.01 | 4.44 ± 0.81 | 0.53 (0.28, 0.79) | <0.001 |
| EPA | 2.13 [1.66, 2.95] | 1.34 [0.94, 1.72] | 1.65 (1.45, 1.88) | <0.001 |
| AA | 7.28 ± 1.52 | 7.25 ± 1.35 | 0.09 (−0.33, 0.51) | 0.680 |
| Main LC-PUFAs (ng/μL) | ||||
| DHA | 70.0 ± 20.6 | 65.4 ± 16.3 | 5.54 (−0.03, 11.2) | 0.051 |
| EPA | 31.1 [22.8, 43.7] | 19.3 [14.3, 25.0] | 1.61 (1.38, 1.84) | <0.001 |
| AA | 104 ± 29.0 | 107 ± 27.6 | −2.38 (−10.8, 6.05) | 0.578 |
| Other FAs and FA indicators (ng/μL) | ||||
| Saturated (8:0–18:0) | 516 ± 150 | 541 ± 137 | −27.0 (−70.8, 16.7) | 0.224 |
| Saturated (20:0–24:0) | 11.6 ± 2.79 | 11.8 ± 3.60 | −0.17 (−1.17, 0.83) | 0.739 |
| Monounsaturated | 350 ± 99.7 | 373 ± 106 | −23.4 (−54.4, 7.67) | 0.139 |
| 18:3n−3 | 4.86 ± 2.87 | 4.76 ± 2.16 | 0.05 (−0.73, 0.84) | 0.893 |
| 22:5n−3 | 13.2 ± 4.64 | 11.9 ± 3.82 | 1.32 (0.00, 2.64) | 0.051 |
| 18:2n−6c | 317 ± 93.8 | 322 ± 91.9 | −4.40 (−33.0, 24.2) | 0.761 |
| 20:3n−6 | 17.1 ± 5.80 | 19.1 ± 6.49 | −1.93 (−3.67, −0.10) | 0.039 |
| Total n−3 FAs (ng/μL) | 123; 41 | 104; 28 | 20 (9, 30) | <0.001 |
| Total n−6 FAs (ng/μL) | 440; 118 | 452; 119 | −10 (−46, 27) | 0.595 |
| 22:5n−6 | 2.59 ± 1.00 | 3.32 ± 1.24 | −0.76 (−1.07, −0.44) | <0.001 |
| Essential and nonessential PUFAs | 1.88 ± 0.39 | 1.75 ± 0.34 | 0.14 (0.02, 0.25) | 0.018 |
| DHA:22:5n−6 ratio | 28.4 ± 7.34 | 21.5 ± 7.31 | 6.85 (4.64, 9.05) | <0.001 |
| AA:EPA + DHA ratio | 1.05 ± 0.26 | 1.28 ± 0.31 | −0.24(−0.32, −0.16) | <0.001 |
AA, arachidonic acid; FA, fatty acid; LC-PUFA, long-chain PUFA.
General least-squares regression analysis with the dependent variable and treatment entered and baseline controlled for.
Mean ± SD (all such values).
Median; 25th, 75th percentiles in brackets (all such values)
Because data were log transformed, effect sizes and CIs are expressed as the antilog of calculated CIs and regression coefficients, which indicate the ratio of the geometric mean of fish-oil to control groups.
Includes 18:0, 17:0, 16:0, 15:0, 14:0, 13:0, 12:0, 11:0, 10:0, and 8:0.
Includes 24:0, 23:0, 22:0, 21:0, and 20:0.
Includes 14:1, 15:1, 16:1, 17:1, 18:1n9c, 20:1, 22:1n−9, and 24:1.
Ratio of n−6 + n−3 to n−9 unsaturated PUFAs. Ordinarily, n−7 PUFAs should be included in the ratio as nonessential FAs, but data for these were unavailable.
FIGURE 2.Plasma DHA and EPA scattered at 9 compared with 3 mo by treatment group (n = 168).
Effect of n−3 LC-PUFA supplementation on primary endpoints at 9 mo by treatment group
| Endpoints | Fish-oil group ( | Control group | Effect size (95% CI) | |
| Growth (anthropometric | ||||
| Weight-for-age | −0.90 ± 1.09 | −1.20 ± 1.28 | 0.15 (−0.08, 0.38) | 0.208 |
| Weight-for-length | −0.57 ± 0.99 | −0.76 ± 1.10 | 0.12 (−0.14, 0.38) | 0.377 |
| Length-for-age | −0.79 ± 1.02 | −1.07 ± 1.30 | 0.79 (−0.27, 0.90) | 0.084 |
| HC-for-age | −0.52 ± 0.84 | −0.64 ± 1.06 | −0.01 (−0.18, 0.17) | 0.954 |
| MUAC-for-age | −0.27 ± 0.92 | −0.66 ± 1.18 | 0.31 (0.06, 0.56) | 0.017 |
| BMI-for-age | −0.60 ± 0.99 | −0.79 ± 1.12 | 0.08 (−0.16, 0.33) | 0.503 |
| Triceps skinfold thickness–for-age | −0.01 ± 0.85 | −0.30 ± 1.09 | 0.27 (0.00, 0.55) | 0.048 |
| Subscapular skinfold thickness–for-age | 0.41 ± 1.12 | 0.27 ± 1.29 | 0.16 (−0.16, 0.48) | 0.326 |
| Gut integrity ( | 86 | 81 | — | — |
| Mannitol percentage recovery | 4.22 ± 2.48 | 4.51 ± 2.04 | −0.34 (−1.04; 0.35) | 0.332 |
| LMR | 0.22 [0.14, 0.37] | 0.22 [0.15, 0.29] | 0.96 (0.87, 1.07) | 0.507 |
| Lactulose:lactose ratio | 0.50 [0.30, 0.91] | 0.64 [0.42, 0.98] | 0.79 (0.60, 1.05) | 0.110 |
| Lactulose percentage recovery | 0.21 [0.11, 0.38] | 0.23 [0.15, 0.32] | 0.91 (0.72, 1.15) | 0.434 |
HC, head circumference; LC-PUFA, long-chain PUFA; LMR, lactulose:mannitol ratio; MUAC, midupper arm circumference.
General least-squares regression analysis with the dependent variable and treatment entered and baseline controlled for. Median growth measurements of each individual were used.
With the use of WHO reference curves (38, 39).
Mean ± SD (all such values).
Data were log transformed.
Regression analysis fitting (log)lactulose on (log)mannitol with baseline values controlled for.
Median; 25th, 75th percentiles in brackets (all such values).
For log-transformed data, effect sizes and CIs are expressed as the antilog of calculated CIs and regression coefficients, which indicate the ratio of geometric means of fish-oil to control groups.
Regression analysis fitting (log)lactulose on (log)lactose with baseline values controlled for.
Anthropometric indexes at 12 mo of age by treatment group with baseline measures controlled for
| Endpoint | Fish-oil group ( | Control group ( | Effect size (95% CI) | |
| Anthropometric z scores | ||||
| Weight-for-age | −1.09 ± 1.13 | −1.41 ± 1.21 | 0.11 (−0.13, 0.35) | 0.357 |
| Weight-for-length | −0.79 ± 1.10 | −1.03 ± 0.97 | 0.17 (−0.09, 0.43) | 0.207 |
| Length-for-age | -0.1.00 ± 1.11 | −1.30 ± 1.32 | 0.08 (−0.15, 0.32) | 0.489 |
| HC-for-age | −0.61 ± 0.87 | −0.72 ± 1.02 | −0.04 (−0.24, 0.16) | 0.713 |
| MUAC-for-age | −0.20 ± 0.94 | −0.64 ± 0.98 | 0.33 (0.09, 0.57) | 0.008 |
| BMI-for-age | −0.69 ± 1.12 | −0.90 ± 0.94 | 0.09 (−0.15, 0.34) | 0.459 |
| Triceps skinfold thickness–for-age | 0.19 ± 0.79 | −0.15 ± 0.82 | 0.31 (0.06, 0.55) | 0.014 |
| Subscapular skinfold thickness–for-age | 0.23 ± 1.05 | −0.14 ± 1.02 | 0.36 (0.06, 0.67) | 0.019 |
HC, head circumference; MUAC, midupper arm circumference.
General least-squares regression analysis with the dependent variable and treatment entered and baseline controlled for.
With the use of WHO reference curves (38, 39).
Mean ± SD (all such values).
Secondary endpoints, by treatment group
| Endpoint | Fish-oil group | Control group | Effect size (95% CI) | |
| Acute-phase proteins ( | 86 | 83 | — | — |
| Plasma albumin (mg/L) | 35.3 ± 3.1 | 35.3 ± 2.8 | 0.07 (−0.83, 0.96) | 0.880 |
| AGP (g/L) | 1.01 [0.85, 1.34] | 1.03 [0.82, 1.36] | 0.97 (0.88, 1.08) | 0.596 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.7 [3.1, 8.2] | 4.7 [3.2, 7.9] | 0.98 (0.81, 1.19) | 0.838 |
| Intestinal inflammation ( | 76 | 69 | — | — |
| Calprotectin dry weight (mg/kg) | 78.0 [43, 120] | 66.5 [46, 138] | 0.90 (0.86, 1.42) | 0.427 |
| Calprotectin wet weight (mg/kg) | 647 [357, 996] | 552 [382, 1145] | — | — |
| Concentrations out of normal range | ||||
| Plasma albumin | 5/86 [0.77, 10.9] | 3/83 [−0.49, 7.71] | — | 0.933 |
| AGP | 44/86 [40.4, 61.9] | 43/83 [40.8, 62.8] | — | 0.501 |
| CRP | 39/86 [34.6, 56.1] | 36/83 [32.5, 54.3] | — | 0.796 |
| Calprotectin | 70/79 [81.4, 95.8] | 62/74 [75.2, 92.4] | — | 0.386 |
AGP, α1-acid glycoprotein; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Mean ± SD (all such values).
General least-squares regression analysis with the dependent variable and treatment entered and baseline controlled for.
Median; 25th, 75th percentiles in brackets (all such values).
Because data were log transformed, effect sizes and CIs are expressed as the antilog of calculated CIs and regression coefficients, which indicated the ratio of the geometric mean of fish-oil to control groups.
With the use of standard adult cutoff ranges from healthy individuals (CRP ≥5 mg/L, AGP ≥1 g/L, and albumin ≤30 mg/L).
Proportion abnormal; 95% CI in brackets (percentage abnormal) (all such values).
Group differences were analyzed by using Pearson's chi-squared test.
With the use of the European healthy reference value [calprotectin ≤263 mg/kg (54)].
Morbidity endpoints by treatment group
| Morbidity rates | Fish-oil group ( | Control group ( | Effect size (95% CI) | |
| Unwell, any complaint | 3603 | 3088 | 0.13 (−0.08, 0.34) | 0.238 |
| Diarrhea | 474 | 605 | −0.27 (−0.61, 0.06) | 0.110 |
| Fever | 1479 | 1297 | 0.11 (−0.12, 0.34) | 0.338 |
| Respiratory complaints | 1645 | 1503 | 0.06 (−0.2, 0.32) | 0.670 |
| Nurse or doctor visits | 186 | 161 | 0.13 (−0.10, 0.36) | 0.268 |
| Vomiting | 251 | 268 | −0.12 (−0.56, 0.03) | 0.570 |
| Abnormal bleeds/other complaints | 12 | 17 | — | — |
Negative binomial regression by using the number of visits an infant was reported ill or with a symptom as a negative binomial variable with log(number of visits) controlled for.
Number of visits at which one or more symptoms were recorded.
Total recorded (all such values).
Number of visits at which any infant was reported to have had this complaint.
Too few observations to make a meaningful statistical comparison.
Cognitive development endpoints by treatment group
| Endpoint | Fish-oil group | Control group | Effect size (95% CI) | |
| 2-step Infant Planning Test ( | 73 | 65 | — | — |
| Average total intention score | 4.63 ± 3.77 | 4.45 ± 3.71 | 0.20 (−1.10, 1.46) | 0.759 |
| Average intentional solutions | 0.44 ± 0.52 | 0.43 ± 0.54 | 0.01 (−0.17, 0.19) | 0.871 |
| Toddler attention assessment ( | 74 | 69 | — | — |
| Inattention rate | 2.38 [1.70, 2.91] | 2.37 [1.70, 2.91] | 0.98 (0.82, 1.81) | 0.868 |
| Mean look duration | 23.8 [19.5, 33.9] | 23.2 [17.2, 35,5] | 1.01 (0.86, 1.20) | 0.884 |
Assessments could not be made for the Infant Planning Test in 17 cases (6 cases in the fish-oil group and 11 cases in the control group) and for the attention test in 12 cases (5 cases in the fish-oil group and 7 cases in the control group) because the children were disturbed or crying or the video recording malfunctioned.
Mean ± SD (all such values).
General least-squares regression analysis with the dependent variable and treatment entered.
Median; 25th, 75th percentiles in brackets (all such values).
Because data were log transformed, effect sizes and CIs are expressed as the antilog of calculated CIs and regression coefficients, which indicate the ratio of the geometric mean of fish-oil to control groups.