Literature DB >> 27133694

Testing a dual-modality system that combines full-field digital mammography and automated breast ultrasound.

Christopher L Vaughan1, Tania S Douglas2, Qonita Said-Hartley3, Roland V Baasch4, James A Boonzaier4, Brian C Goemans4, John Harverson4, Michael W Mingay4, Shuaib Omar4, Raphael V Smith4, Nielen C Venter4, Heidi S Wilson4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test a novel dual-modality imaging system that combines full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in a single platform. Our Aceso system, named after the Greek goddess of healing, was specifically designed for the early detection of cancer in women with dense breast tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aceso was first tested using two industry standards: a Contrast Detail Mammography (CDMAM) phantom as endorsed by European Reference Organisation for Quality Assured Breast Screening and Diagnostic Services was used to assess the FFDM images; and the CIRS 040GSE ultrasound phantom was imaged to evaluate the quality of the ABUS images. In addition, 58 women participated in a clinical trial: 51 were healthy volunteers aged between 40 and 65, while 7 were patients referred by the breast clinic, 6 of whom had biopsy-proven breast cancer.
RESULTS: The CDMAM tests showed that the FFDM results were "acceptable" but fell short of "achievable" which was attributed to the low dose used. The ABUS images had good depth penetration (80 mm) and adequate axial resolution (0.5 mm), but the lateral resolution of 2 mm was judged to be too coarse. In a 42-year-old volunteer with extremely dense breast tissue, the ABUS modality detected a lesion (a benign cyst) that was mammographically occult in the FFDM image. For a 73-year-old patient with fatty breasts, a malignant lesion was successfully detected and co-registered in the FFDM and ABUS images. On average, each woman spent less than 11 min in the acquisition room.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is room for improvement in the quality of both the FFDM and ABUS images, Aceso has demonstrated its ability to acquire clinically meaningful images for a range of women with varying breast densities and, therefore, has potential as a screening device.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABUS; Breast cancer; Dense breasts; Dual-modality imaging; FFDM

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27133694      PMCID: PMC4853655          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  25 in total

1.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Nelson; K K Lindfors; J A Seibert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Diagnosing breast cancer: an opportunity for innovative engineering.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan; Michael D Evans
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2012-05-23

3.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.

Authors:  Avice O'Connell; David L Conover; Yan Zhang; Posy Seifert; Wende Logan-Young; Chuen-Fu Linda Lin; Lawrence Sahler; Ruola Ning
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Radiation dose from a linear slit scanning X-ray machine with full-body imaging capabilities.

Authors:  B J Irving; G J Maree; E R Hering; T S Douglas
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Modeling, validation and application of a mathematical tissue-equivalent breast phantom for linear slot-scanning digital mammography.

Authors:  K Hussein; C L Vaughan; T S Douglas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis--analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Fritz K W Schaefer; A Waldmann; A Katalinic; C Wefelnberg; M Heller; W Jonat; I Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.

Authors:  D R Dance; K C Young; R E van Engen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Kevin M Kelly; Judy Dean; W Scott Comulada; Sung-Jae Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preliminary Clinical Experience with a Combined Automated Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System.

Authors:  Eric D Larson; Won-Mean Lee; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Chris Lashbrook; Cynthia E Davis; Oliver D Kripfgans; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  First proof-of-concept evaluation of the FUSION-X-US-II prototype for the performance of automated breast ultrasound in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Benedikt Schaefgen; Marija Juskic; Madeleine Hertel; Richard G Barr; Marcus Radicke; Anne Stieber; André Hennigs; Fabian Riedel; Christof Sohn; Joerg Heil; Michael Golatta
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Detecting Breast Cancer with a Dual-Modality Device.

Authors:  Kamila Padia; Tania S Douglas; Lydia L Cairncross; Roland V Baasch; Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.