Literature DB >> 27098058

Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes.

Hongyi Yang1, Qingling Yang1, Shanjun Dai1, Gang Li1, Haixia Jin1, Guidong Yao1, Yingpu Sun2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whether there are differences in the pregnancy outcomes of blastocysts cryopreserved during different developmental stages remains under debate because the results among studies are inconsistent. We analyzed blastocyst quality and pregnancy outcomes by considering blastocyst euploidy and investigated the differences in the development potential between blastocysts of different developmental stages (frozen-thawed day 5 [D5] and day 6 [D6] cycles) and their relationship with clinical pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: In total, 1374 D5 and 255 D6 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles were retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, the chromosome euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates of 237 blastocysts from 50 pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGS) cycles were statistically analyzed. The corresponding euploidy rate and pregnancy outcomes of the D5 and D6 blastocyst transfers were also compared.
RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate (47.2 vs 40.0 %; P = 0.04) and implantation rate (34.2 vs 28.8 %; P = 0.03) of the D5 blastocysts were higher than were those of the D6 blastocysts. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (52.4 vs 52.6 %; P = 0.97) and implantation rate (38.9 vs 35.6 %; P = 0.39) of the high-quality D5 blastocysts did not significantly differ from those of the high-quality D6 blastocysts. Analysis of blastocyst euploidy in 237 blastocysts examined in 50 PGS cycles showed that the euploidy rates of the D5 and D6 blastocysts were both 48.1 % (P = 0.99). The clinical pregnancy rate of the D5 blastocysts (48.5 vs 17.6 %; P = 0.03) was higher than that of the D6 blastocysts. The euploidy rates (55.2 vs 55.3 %; P = 0.99) and clinical pregnancy rates (60.0 vs 42.9 %; P = 0.77) of the high-quality D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. The euploidy rate (55.3 vs 41.5 %, P = 0.03) and clinical pregnancy rate (54.5 vs 25.0 %, P = 0.03) of the high-quality blastocysts were higher than were those of the poor-quality blastocysts.
CONCLUSIONS: The euploidy rates between the D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. High-quality D6 blastocysts in frozen-thawed cycles had similar developmental potential and pregnancy outcomes compared to those of high-quality D5 blastocysts. The quality of the blastocysts was an important factor that affected the pregnancy outcomes of the frozen-thawed cycles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D5/D6 blastocyst; Euploidy rate; Frozen-thawed cycles; Pregnancy rate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098058      PMCID: PMC4930781          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0712-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  21 in total

Review 1.  Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Siriol Griffiths; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.

Authors:  Bruce S Shapiro; Said T Daneshmand; Forest C Garner; Martha Aguirre; Richard Ross
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts.

Authors:  T Mukaida; C Oka; T Goto; K Takahashi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes.

Authors:  Masashige Kuwayama; Gábor Vajta; Osamu Kato; Stanley P Leibo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 5.  The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Athanasios Siozos; Virginia Noelle Bolton; Yakoub Khalaf; Peter Riven Braude; Tarek El-Toukhy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Debbie Blake; Cindy Farquhar; Ariel Bardach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

7.  Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles.

Authors:  T El-Toukhy; E Wharf; R Walavalkar; A Singh; V Bolton; Y Khalaf; P Braude
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Takafumi Utsunomiya; Hiroko Ito; Miyuki Nagaki; Junko Sato
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Eric D Levens; Brian W Whitcomb; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Belinda J Yauger; Frederick W Larsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  The Influence of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray-Based Molecular Karyotype on Preimplantation Embryonic Development Potential.

Authors:  Gang Li; Nannan He; Haixia Jin; Yan Liu; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Erica Anspach Will; Alison Bartolucci; John Nulsen; Claudio Benadiva; Lawrence Engmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Effect of Embryo Developmental Stage, Morphological Grading, and Ploidy Status on Live Birth Rate in Frozen Cycles of Single Blastocyst Transfer.

Authors:  Hui Ji; Yuxi Zhou; Shanren Cao; Junqiang Zhang; Xiufeng Ling; Chun Zhao; Rong Shen
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Authors:  Alice Tubbing; Chloë Shaw-Jackson; Lieveke Ameye; Jérôme Colin; Serge Rozenberg; Candice Autin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Live Birth Rate of Frozen-Thawed Single Blastocyst Transfer After 6 or 7 Days of Progesterone Administration in Hormone Replacement Therapy Cycles: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xinhong Yang; Zhiqin Bu; Linli Hu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  The Influence of Delayed Blastocyst Development on the Outcome of Frozen-Thawed Transfer of Euploid and Untested Embryos.

Authors:  Parnita Sardana; Jwal Banker; Reena Gupta; Aditi Kotdawala; P G L Lalitkumar; Manish Banker
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-07-09

7.  Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program.

Authors:  G M Yerushalmi; T Shavit; S Avraham; M Youngster; A Kedem; I Gat; U S Dorofeyeva; S Mashiach; E Schiff; A Shulman; D S Seidman; A Wiser; E Maman; A Hourvitz; M Baum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Parameters impacting the live birth rate per transfer after frozen single euploid blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Meral Gultomruk; Sabri Cavkaytar; Emre Turgut; Necati Findikli; Munevver Serdarogullari; Onder Coban; Zalihe Yarkiner; Carmen Rubio; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  D6 blastocyst transfer on day 6 in frozen-thawed cycles should be avoided: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Huiling Xu; Shumin Qiu; Xiaojing Chen; Suqin Zhu; Yan Sun; Beihong Zheng
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Dong Soo Park; Ji Won Kim; Eun Mi Chang; Woo Sik Lee; Tae Ki Yoon; Sang Woo Lyu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.