Literature DB >> 17224151

Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.

Bruce S Shapiro1, Said T Daneshmand, Forest C Garner, Martha Aguirre, Richard Ross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers on patterns of implantation rates and pregnancy rates (PRs) among fresh autologous, oocyte donor, and frozen ET (FET) cycles.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Private fertility center. PATIENT(S): The study included 377 fresh autologous cycles, 106 autologous FET cycles, and 56 fresh oocyte donor cycles. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rates and clinical PRs. RESULT(S): The clinical PR for day 5 blastocyst transfers was higher than for day 6 blastocyst transfers in fresh autologous cycles (PRs, 51.0% and 33.3%, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between transfers of blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5 and day 6 in FET cycles (PRs, 63.6% and 58.9%, respectively). Furthermore, day 6 blastocyst transfers significantly outperformed day 5 transfers in donor cycles (PRs, 63.0% and 86.2%, respectively), a reversal of the pattern seen in the fresh autologous cycles. Day 6 blastocysts were associated with a significantly greater PR in FET cycles than in fresh autologous cycles (58.9% and 33.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): The superior PRs with day 5 blastocyst transfers in fresh autologous cycles and with day 6 blastocysts in donor cycles may have resulted from better synchrony with endometrial development. This was further supported by the superior performance of day 6 blastocysts in FET cycles relative to their fresh counterparts. Similar PRs with cryopreserved day 5 and day 6 blastocysts in FET cycles may reflect that, in these cycles, day 5 and day 6 blastocysts had equivalent quality and similar synchrony with the endometrium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17224151     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  28 in total

1.  Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Erica Anspach Will; Alison Bartolucci; John Nulsen; Claudio Benadiva; Lawrence Engmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  What is the contribution of embryo-endometrial asynchrony to implantation failure?

Authors:  Wan-Tinn Teh; John McBain; Peter Rogers
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.

Authors:  Mae Wu Healy; Meghan Yamasaki; George Patounakis; Kevin S Richter; Kate Devine; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Endometrial morphology and modulation of hormone receptors during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Laura Detti; Ghassan M Saed; Nicole M Fletcher; Michael L Kruger; Michelle Brossoit; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Optimal embryo transfer strategy in poor response may include freeze-all.

Authors:  Murat Berkkanoglu; Kevin Coetzee; Hasan Bulut; Kemal Ozgur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6.

Authors:  Eman Elgindy; Mervat Sheikh-El-Arab Elsedeek
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Eric D Levens; Brian W Whitcomb; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Belinda J Yauger; Frederick W Larsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) a phase IV, prospective, multicenter, observational oocyte cryopreservation registry.

Authors:  Diego Ezcurra; Jennifer Rangnow; Maryellen Craig; Joan Schertz
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.