Literature DB >> 33174188

Effect of Embryo Developmental Stage, Morphological Grading, and Ploidy Status on Live Birth Rate in Frozen Cycles of Single Blastocyst Transfer.

Hui Ji1,2, Yuxi Zhou1, Shanren Cao1, Junqiang Zhang1, Xiufeng Ling1, Chun Zhao3, Rong Shen4,5.   

Abstract

To determine whether embryo developmental stage or morphological grading can predict live birth rate (LBR) from a single blastocyst in nonbiopsied and biopsied frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. This retrospective study included 1336 nonbiopsied and 360 euploid FET cycles. Blastocysts were divided according to developmental stage (day 5 [D5] and day 6 [D6]) and morphology (good quality and low quality). Nonbiopsied cycles in which D5 blastocysts were transferred were associated with a significantly higher LBR than those in the D6 group (48.5 vs. 24.3%; p < 0.001), as well as in good-quality embryo transfer cycles than that in low-quality embryo cycles (52.6 vs. 25.3%; p < 0.001). Embryos reaching good-quality blastocysts on D5 yielded significantly higher LBR than those similar quality blastocysts on D6. The same trend was seen in low-quality embryos. Concerning only D5 or D6 blastocyst transfer, the LBRs of good-quality embryos were still superior to those of low-quality embryos. In the case of euploid embryo transfers, the LBR (48.9 vs. 44.9%, p = 0.444) of D5 blastocysts did not significantly differ from that of D6 blastocysts. Good-quality embryos showed a higher LBR than low-quality embryos (51.6 vs. 40.0%, p = 0.030); the adjusted odds ratio remained insignificant after controlling for confounders (aOR 1.56; 95% CI 0.99-2.45; p = 0.056). The LBRs in the same developmental stage or morphology subgroups were not statistically significant. Embryo developmental stage and morphological grade are useful predictors of LBR in nonbiopsied FET cycles. However, no association was found in euploid transfer cycles.

Keywords:  Developmental stage; Live birth rate; Morphological grading; PGT-A; Single blastocyst transfer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33174188     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00381-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  33 in total

Review 1.  Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer.

Authors:  Bruce S Shapiro; Said T Daneshmand; Forest C Garner; Martha Aguirre; Cynthia Hudson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Authors:  Alice Tubbing; Chloë Shaw-Jackson; Lieveke Ameye; Jérôme Colin; Serge Rozenberg; Candice Autin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Athanasios Siozos; Virginia Noelle Bolton; Yakoub Khalaf; Peter Riven Braude; Tarek El-Toukhy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.

Authors:  Lucile Ferreux; Mathilde Bourdon; Amira Sallem; Pietro Santulli; Virginie Barraud-Lange; Nathalie Le Foll; Chloé Maignien; Charles Chapron; Dominique de Ziegler; Jean-Philippe Wolf; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Nina Desai; Stephanie Ploskonka; Linnea Goodman; Marjan Attaran; Jeffrey M Goldberg; Cynthia Austin; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6.

Authors:  Jigal Haas; Jim Meriano; Carl Laskin; Yaakov Bentov; Eran Barzilay; Robert F Casper; Ken Cadesky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Endometrial injury, the quality of embryos, and blastocyst transfer are the most important prognostic factors for in vitro fertilization success after previous repeated unsuccessful attempts.

Authors:  Milan Reljič; Jure Knez; Vilma Kovač; Borut Kovačič
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Investigating the impact of the timing of blastulation on implantation: management of embryo-endometrial synchrony improves outcomes.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Eric J Forman; George Patounakis; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Kathleen M Upham; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-12-20

10.  Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Hongyi Yang; Qingling Yang; Shanjun Dai; Gang Li; Haixia Jin; Guidong Yao; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.357

View more
  3 in total

1.  Functional Ovarian Cysts in Artificial Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles With Depot Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist.

Authors:  Hui Ji; Yan Su; Mianqiu Zhang; Xin Li; Xiuling Li; Hui Ding; Li Dong; Shanren Cao; Chun Zhao; Junqiang Zhang; Rong Shen; Xiufeng Ling
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wenzhi Li; Mingru Yin; Menghui Li; Ling Wu; Jiqiang Si; Leiwen Zhao; Bin Li; Zheng Yan; Qifeng Lyu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.